Managing the constraints of boundary spanning in emergency management

被引:11
|
作者
Curnin, Steven [1 ]
Owen, Christine [1 ]
Trist, Cain [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Bushfire Cooperat Res Ctr, Fac Educ, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Fire Serv Commissioner Victoria, Melbourne, Vic 3002, Australia
关键词
Boundary spanning; Emergency operations centre; Multi-agency coordination; Liaison officer; Emergency management; Disaster management; ROLES; COORDINATION; CHALLENGES; DISASTERS; SPANNERS; DESIGN; NVIVO;
D O I
10.1007/s10111-014-0285-z
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Stakeholders tasked with boundary spanning in emergency management are fundamental in facilitating multi-agency coordination. However, there is a scarcity of research investigating the characteristics of emergency management boundary spanners and how they achieve this function in the complex environment of emergency operation centres. An exploratory case study approach was adopted and applied in a strategic-level emergency operations centre. The study used three very different but interrelated qualitative research techniques based upon the Core-Task Analysis framework to categorize the work of stakeholders fulfilling a boundary spanning role in this setting. The data identified that stakeholders performing boundary spanning activities in a strategic-level emergency operations centre face a number of constraints. These can include unfamiliarity with the work domain, its personnel, and structure which can lead to temporal, cultural and information challenges. In order to manage these constraints, boundary spanners working in a strategic-level emergency operations centre need to adopt certain characteristics in order to accomplish their activities. A significant outcome from the data was the necessity to engage in these important undertakings in the pre-response phase in an effort to facilitate successful multi-agency coordination in an actual emergency event.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 563
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MANAGING AN EMERGENCY
    PERKINS, TG
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 1986, 31 (387): : 50 - &
  • [32] Boundary Spanning and Reconstitution in Migration
    Ahmed, Anya
    SOCIAL INCLUSION, 2020, 8 (01) : 238 - 240
  • [33] Boundary Spanning in Interorganizational Collaboration
    Leung, Zeno C. S.
    ADMINISTRATION IN SOCIAL WORK, 2013, 37 (05): : 447 - 457
  • [34] Knowledge boundary spanning process: synthesizing four spanning mechanisms
    Hawkins, Matthew A.
    Rezazade M, Mohammad H.
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2012, 50 (10) : 1800 - 1815
  • [35] Spanning trees with constraints on the leaf degree
    Kaneko, A
    DISCRETE APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2001, 115 (1-3) : 73 - 76
  • [36] Comments on "Assessing and Managing Environmental Risk: Connecting Local Government Management with Emergency Management"
    Bonfield, Thomas J.
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2009, 69 (02) : 194 - 197
  • [37] Social constraints in cross-boundary collaborative deer management
    Prager, Katrin
    Lorenzo-Arribas, Altea
    Bull, Hans
    Kvernstuen, Mikkel Slaaen
    Loe, Leif Egil
    Mysterud, Atle
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (04):
  • [38] Managing design constraints
    Moretti, G
    EDN, 2002, 47 (08) : 49 - +
  • [39] Management of Information Systems Outsourcing: Evaluation of Lessons Learned From a Boundary Spanning Perspective
    Johansson, Bjorn
    Bergkvist, Linda
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION, 2011, : 234 - 242
  • [40] A boundary spanning system supports large-scale ecosystem-based management
    James, C. Andrew
    Francis, Tessa B.
    Baker, Joel E.
    Georgiadis, Nick
    Kinney, Aimee
    Magel, Caitlin
    Rice, Jeff
    Roberts, Tanya
    Wright, Christopher W.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2022, 133 : 137 - 145