The Greater Good: How Supervising Physicians Make Entrustment Decisions in the Pediatric Emergency Department

被引:30
|
作者
Tiyyagura, Gunjan [1 ]
Balmer, Dorene [2 ]
Chaudoin, Lindsey [3 ]
Kessler, David [4 ]
Khanna, Kajal [5 ]
Srivastava, Geetanjali [6 ]
Chang, Todd P. [7 ]
Auerbach, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Pediat & Emergency Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Dept Pediat, New York, NY 10027 USA
[5] Stanford Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[6] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Dallas, TX USA
[7] Childrens Hosp Los Angeles, Dept Pediat, Los Angeles, CA 90027 USA
关键词
entrustable professional activities; medical education; resident assessment; simulation; PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES; CLINICAL SKILLS; SELF-ASSESSMENT; COMPETENCE; PERFORMANCE; CONFIDENCE; RESIDENTS; EDUCATION; OFFICERS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.acap.2014.06.001
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Graduate medical education is transitioning to the use of entrustable professional activities to contextualize educational competencies. Factors influencing entrustment decisions have been reported in adult medicine. Knowing how such decisions are made in pediatrics is critical to this transition. PURPOSE: To understand how supervisors determine the level of procedural supervision to provide a resident, taking into consideration simulation performance; to understand factors that affect supervisors' transparency to parents about residents' procedural experience. METHODS: We conducted 18 one-on-one interviews with supervisors in a tertiary care pediatric emergency department, iteratively revising interview questions as patterns in the data were elucidated. Two researchers independently coded transcripts and then met with the investigative team to refine codes and create themes. RESULTS: Five factors influenced supervisors' entrustment decisions: 1) resident characteristics that include self-reported confidence, seniority, and prior interactions with the resident; 2) supervisor style; 3) nature of the procedure/characteristics of the patient; 4) environmental factors; and 5) parental preferences: Supervisors thought that task-based simulators provided practice opportunities but that simulated performance did not provide evidence for entrustment. Supervisors reported selectively omitting details about a resident's experience level to families to optimize experiential learning for residents they entrusted to perform a procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In pediatrics, supervisors consider various factors when making decisions regarding resident procedural readiness, including parental preferences. An educational system using entrustable professional activities may facilitate holistic assessment and foster expertise-informed decisions about residents' progression toward entrustment; such a system may also lessen supervisors' need to omit information to parents about residents' procedural readiness.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 602
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Approaches of Emergency Department Physicians to Pediatric Burns: A Survey Assessment
    Demir, Sabri
    Oztorun, Can Ihsan
    Erturk, Ahmet
    Guney, Dogus
    Ertoy, Ayse
    Doruk, Hayal
    Tanriverdi, Fatih
    Azili, Mujdem Nur
    Senel, Emrah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH, 2022, 43 (01): : 115 - 120
  • [22] EVALUATION OF ADOLESCENT PATIENTS' TRUST IN THEIR PHYSICIANS IN A PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT
    Efrem, Eden
    Badolato, Gia
    Lemke, Monika
    Goyal, Monika
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2023, 72 (03) : S41 - S42
  • [23] The Impact of Diagnostic Decisions on Patient Experience in the Pediatric Emergency Department
    Gorski, Jillian K.
    Mendonca, Eneida A.
    Showalter, Cory D.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2022, 38 (02) : E644 - E649
  • [24] Skull radiograph interpretation of children younger than two years: How good are pediatric emergency physicians?
    Chung, S
    Schamban, N
    Wypij, D
    Cleveland, R
    Schutzman, SA
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 43 (06) : 718 - 722
  • [25] From Context Comes Expertise: How Do Expert Emergency Physicians Use Their Know-Who to Make Decisions?
    Pelaccia, Thierry
    Tardif, Jacques
    Triby, Emmanuel
    Ammirati, Christine
    Bertrand, Catherine
    Dory, Valerie
    Charlin, Bernard
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 67 (06) : 747 - 751
  • [26] How do physicians and nurses spend their time in the emergency department?
    Hollingsworth, JC
    Chisholm, CD
    Giles, BK
    Cordell, WH
    Nelson, DR
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 31 (01) : 87 - 91
  • [27] Triage of patients with chest pain in the emergency department: A comparative study of physicians' decisions
    Reilly, BM
    Evans, AT
    Schaider, JJ
    Wang, Y
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 112 (02): : 95 - 103
  • [28] Cultivating conscience: Learning to make end-of-life decisions in the emergency department
    Keyes, LE
    English, DK
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 33 (04) : 464 - 468
  • [29] Methods of categorizing emergency department visit urgency - A survey of pediatric emergency medicine physicians
    Brousseau, David C.
    Mistry, Rakesh D.
    Alessandrini, Evaline A.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2006, 22 (09) : 635 - 639
  • [30] How rational is the crossmatching of blood in a pediatric emergency department?
    GruppPhelan, J
    Tanz, RR
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE, 1996, 150 (11): : 1140 - 1144