Screening and clinical significance of lymph node metastasis-related genes within esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma

被引:3
|
作者
Han, Rui [1 ]
Chen, Gang [1 ]
Li, Meng [1 ]
Peng, Zhong-Min [1 ]
Xu, Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong First Med Univ, Shandong Prov Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Jinan 250021, Shandong, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2021年 / 10卷 / 15期
关键词
CDK6; esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma; LRP1B; lymph node metastasis; targeted next-generation sequencing; GASTRIC-CANCER; RATIO NLR; LRP1B; NEUTROPHIL; EXPRESSION; CDK6; PLR; MIGRATION; PATHWAY; REGION;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.4065
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Despite recent improvements in treatment technologies, such as surgical resection and chemoradiotherapy, the prognosis of patients with esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (EJA) remains poor due to early lymph node metastasis. Since few studies have investigated genes associated with lymph node metastasis in EJA, we aimed to screen lymph node metastasis-associated genes and clarify their expression status and prognostic significance in EJA. Methods The differential frequency of mutations between carcinoma and para-carcinoma tissues from 199 cases with EJA was detected using targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS). Following a stratified analysis to determine that gender has no effect on the frequency of gene mutations, lymph node metastasis-related genes, including CDK6, MET, NOTCH1, and LRP1B, were screened, and CDK6 and LRP1B were selected for further study as they displayed significant differences in mutation rates. Differences in their expression status were verified using immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in 18 CDK6- and 17 LRP1B-mutated samples and a randomly matched control group. Results tNGS revealed that CDK6 and LRP1B mutation frequencies were significantly different between EJA cases with (N >= 1) or without (N = 0) lymph node metastasis. In particular, CDK6 mutation frequency was expected less, whereas that of LRP1B was remarkably higher in cases with stage N0 than in those with stage N >= 1. IHC staining confirmed significant differences in CDK6 and LRP1B expression status between the study and control cohorts. Chi-square tests revealed that a high CDK6 expression status correlated significantly with smoking history (p = 0.044), T stage (p = 0.035), N stage (p = 0.000), and advanced TNM stage (p = 0.001) in EJA, whereas a high LRP1B expression status only correlated with BMI (p = 0.013) and N stage (p = 0.000). Furthermore, as confirmed by survival status investigation, a high LRP1B expression status predicted good prognosis, and a high CDK6 expression status was an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with EJA. Conclusions Taken together, the findings of this study demonstrate that a high CDK6 and LRP1B expression status promotes and inhibits lymph node metastasis in patients with EJA, respectively, suggesting that both CDK6 and LRP1B are significantly potential predictors of lymph node metastasis and prognosis in EJA.
引用
收藏
页码:5088 / 5100
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Priority of lymph node dissection for advanced esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with the tumor center located below the esophagogastric junction
    Cai, Ming-Zhi
    Lv, Chen-Bin
    Cai, Li-Sheng
    Chen, Qiu-Xian
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (51)
  • [32] Quantitative proteomic analysis identifying three annexins as lymph node metastasis-related proteins in lung adenocarcinoma
    Liu, Ying-Fu
    Chen, Yong-Heng
    Li, Mao-Yu
    Zhang, Peng-Fei
    Peng, Fang
    Li, Guo-Qing
    Xiao, Zhi-Qiang
    Chen, Zhu-Chu
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 29 (01) : 174 - 184
  • [33] Rate of Lymph Node Metastasis and Outcome of Endoscopic Resection for High Grade Dysplasia and Superficial Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction
    Yamada, Masayoshi
    Oda, Ichiro
    Nonaka, Satoru
    Suzuki, Haruhisa
    Yoshinaga, Shigetaka
    Saito, Yutaka
    Taniguchi, Hirokazu
    Sekine, Shigeki
    Kushima, Ryoji
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 234 - 234
  • [34] Clinical significance of immunohistochemically detectable lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater
    Mizuno, T
    Ishizaki, Y
    Ogura, K
    Yoshimoto, J
    Kawasaki, S
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 93 (02) : 221 - 225
  • [35] Construction of Lymph Node Metastasis-Related Prognostic Model and Analysis of Immune Infiltration Mode in Lung Adenocarcinoma
    Li, Wujin
    Ou, Debin
    Zhang, Jiguang
    Ye, Mingfan
    COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 2022
  • [36] Quantitative proteomic analysis identifying three annexins as lymph node metastasis-related proteins in lung adenocarcinoma
    Ying-Fu Liu
    Yong-Heng Chen
    Mao-Yu Li
    Peng-Fei Zhang
    Fang Peng
    Guo-Qing Li
    Zhi-Qiang Xiao
    Zhu-Chu Chen
    Medical Oncology, 2012, 29 : 174 - 184
  • [37] Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis in gastric adenocarcinoma
    Kama, NA
    Yazgan, A
    Avsar, FM
    Coskun, T
    Gozalan, U
    PROGRESS IN GASTRIC CANCER RESEARCH 1997: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL GASTRIC CANCER CONGRESS, 1997, : 215 - 218
  • [38] Frequency and clinical impact of lymph node micrometastasis and tumor cell microinvolvement in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction
    Mueller, JD
    Stein, HJ
    Oyang, T
    Natsugoe, S
    Feith, M
    Werner, M
    Siewert, JR
    CANCER, 2000, 89 (09) : 1874 - 1882
  • [39] Should the splenic hilar lymph node be dissected for the management of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction?
    Kumazu, Yuta
    Hasegawa, Shinichi
    Hayashi, Tsutomu
    Yamada, Takanobu
    Watanabe, Hayato
    Hara, Kentaro
    Shimoda, Yota
    Nakazono, Masato
    Nagasawa, Shinsuke
    Rino, Yasushi
    Masuda, Munetaka
    Ogata, Takashi
    Oshima, Takashi
    Yoshikawa, Takaki
    EJSO, 2023, 49 (01): : 76 - 82
  • [40] Lymph node metastasis in lung squamous cell carcinoma and identification of metastasis-related genes based on the Cancer Genome Atlas
    Dong, Ming
    Gong, Hao
    Li, Tong
    Li, Xin
    Liu, Jinghao
    Zhang, Hongbing
    Liu, Minghui
    Chen, Gang
    Liu, Hongyu
    Chen, Jun
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (14): : 6280 - 6294