Native internally calibrated chromatin immunoprecipitation for quantitative studies of histone post-translational modifications

被引:13
|
作者
Grzybowski, Adrian T. [1 ]
Shah, Rohan N. [1 ,2 ]
Richter, William F. [1 ]
Ruthenburg, Alexander J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Mol Genet & Cell Biol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Div Biol Sci, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DNA INTERACTIONS INVIVO; CHIP-SEQ; H3K4; MONOMETHYLATION; READ ALIGNMENT; METHYLATION; TRANSCRIPTION; ANTIBODIES; ENHANCERS; BINDING; FORMALDEHYDE;
D O I
10.1038/s41596-019-0218-7
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled to next-generation sequencing (ChIP-seq) has served as the central method for the study of histone modifications for the past decade. In ChIP-seq analyses, antibodies selectively capture nucleosomes bearing a modification of interest and the associated DNA is then mapped to the genome to determine the distribution of the mark. This approach has several important drawbacks: (i) ChIP interpretation necessitates the assumption of perfect antibody specificity, despite growing evidence that this is often not the case. (ii) Common methods for evaluating antibody specificity in other formats have little or no bearing on specificity within a ChIP experiment. (iii) Uncalibrated ChIP is reported as relative enrichment, which is biologically meaningless outside the experimental reference frame defined by a discrete immunoprecipitation (IP), thus preventing facile comparison across experimental conditions or modifications. (iv) Differential library amplification and loading onto next-generation sequencers, as well as computational normalization, can further compromise quantitative relationships that may exist between samples. Consequently, the researcher is presented with a series of potential pitfalls and is blind to nearly all of them. Here we provide a detailed protocol for internally calibrated ChIP (ICeChIP), a method we recently developed to resolve these problems by spike-in of defined nucleosomal standards within a ChIP procedure. This protocol is optimized for specificity and quantitative power, allowing for measurement of antibody specificity and absolute measurement of histone modification density (HMD) at genomic loci on a biologically meaningful scale enabling unambiguous comparisons. We provide guidance on optimal conditions for next-generation sequencing (NGS) and instructions for data analysis. This protocol takes between 17 and 18 h, excluding time for sequencing or bioinformatic analysis. The ICeChIP procedure enables accurate measurement of histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) genome-wide in mammalian cells as well as Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans, indicating suitability for use in eukaryotic cells more broadly.
引用
收藏
页码:3275 / 3302
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Selenalysine as a Chemical Tool for Probing Histone Post-Translational Modifications
    Martin, Sandra Pinzon
    Mecinovic, Jasmin
    BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY, 2025, 36 (03) : 510 - 520
  • [42] An updated map of Trypanosoma cruzi histone post-translational modifications
    Rafael Fogaça de Almeida
    Matheus Fernandes
    Lyris Martins Franco de Godoy
    Scientific Data, 8
  • [43] Prediction of histone post-translational modifications using deep learning
    Baisya, Dipankar Ranjan
    Lonardi, Stefano
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2021, 36 (24) : 5610 - 5617
  • [44] The Role of Histone Post-Translational Modifications in Merkel Cell Carcinoma
    Mazziotta, Chiara
    Lanzillotti, Carmen
    Gafa, Roberta
    Touze, Antoine
    Durand, Marie-Alice
    Martini, Fernanda
    Rotondo, John Charles
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [45] Histone post-translational modifications — cause and consequence of genome function
    Gonzalo Millán-Zambrano
    Adam Burton
    Andrew J. Bannister
    Robert Schneider
    Nature Reviews Genetics, 2022, 23 : 563 - 580
  • [46] Quantitative approaches for analysis of regulatory post-translational modifications
    Gorman, J. J.
    Wallis, T. P.
    Dave, K. A.
    Hamilton, B. R.
    Headlam, M. J.
    Linke, S.
    Peet, D. J.
    MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2007, 6 (08) : 15 - 15
  • [47] Neural tube defects and epigenetics: role of histone post-translational histone modifications
    Pardo, Rosa, V
    Finnell, Richard H.
    Ross, M. Elizabeth
    Alarcon, Pablo
    Suazo, Jose
    EPIGENOMICS, 2024, 16 (06) : 419 - 426
  • [48] Detection of Post-translational Modifications on Native Intact Nucleosomes by ELISA
    Dai, Bo
    Dahmani, Farida
    Cichocki, Joseph A.
    Swanson, Lindsey C.
    Rasmussen, Theodore P.
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2011, (50):
  • [49] Mitotic post-translational modifications of histones promote chromatin compaction in vitro
    Zhiteneva, Alisa
    Bonfiglio, Juan Jose
    Makarov, Alexandr
    Colby, Thomas
    Vagnarelli, Paola
    Schirmer, Eric C.
    Matic, Ivan
    Earnshaw, William C.
    OPEN BIOLOGY, 2017, 7 (09):
  • [50] Histone post-translational modifications associated to BAALC expression in leukemic cells
    Franzoni, Alessandra
    Passon, Nadia
    Fabbro, Dora
    Tiribelli, Mario
    Damiani, Daniela
    Damante, Giuseppe
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2012, 417 (02) : 721 - 725