When to Perform Surgical Resection or Radiofrequency Ablation for Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma? A Nomogram-guided Treatment Strategy

被引:22
|
作者
Liu, Po-Hong [1 ,4 ]
Hsu, Chia-Yang [2 ,4 ]
Lee, Yun-Hsuan [1 ,4 ]
Hsia, Cheng-Yuan [4 ,7 ]
Huang, Yi-Hsiang [1 ,5 ]
Su, Chien-Wei [1 ,4 ]
Chiou, Yi-You [3 ,4 ]
Lin, Han-Chieh [1 ,4 ]
Huo, Teh-Ia [1 ,4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Fac Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[5] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Inst Clin Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[6] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Inst Pharmacol, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[7] Univ Nevada, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Reno, NV 89557 USA
关键词
TRANSARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL FEATURES; SURVIVAL; MANAGEMENT; RECURRENCE; CANCER; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000001808
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is indicated for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the comparative efficacy between RFA and surgical resection (SR) is inconclusive. We aim to develop a prognostic nomogram for predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) after RFA. We also evaluate the possibility of using nomogram in improving treatment algorithm.We retrospectively enrolled 836 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer very-early/early-stage HCC receiving SR or RFA. A visually-orientated nomogram was constructed with Cox proportional hazards model, and number and size of tumor, platelet count, albumin level, and model for end-stage liver disease score were included. The concordance index of the nomogram was 0.69.Radiofrequency ablation patients were stratified into low and high-risk groups by the median of nomogram scores. The RFS and overall survival (OS) of 2 risk groups were compared with SR patients with propensity score matching analysis. SR provided better RFS and OS compared with high-risk (nomogram score 9.8) RFA patients in the propensity model. The 5-year RFS rates were 36% versus 11%, whereas the 5-year OS rates were 74% versus 60% for SR and high-risk RFA groups, respectively (both P<0.05). However, SR was associated with better RFS (5-year RFS rates 41% vs 29%), but similar OS (5-year OS rates 80% vs 81%), compared with low-risk (nomogram score <9.8) RFA patients in the propensity model (P<0.05 and P>0.05, respectively).In conclusion, this user-friendly nomogram offers individualized recurrence risk estimation and stratification for early HCC patients receiving curative RFA. The nomogram can be integrated into current treatment algorithm. SR should be considered the first-line treatment for high-risk patients to achieve better long-term survival.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reply to "Surgical resection or radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma"
    Kawaguchi, Yoshikuni
    Tateishi, Ryosuke
    Kokudo, Norihiro
    Hasegawa, Kiyoshi
    LIVER CANCER, 2023, 12 (05)
  • [22] Treatment Strategy for Early Hepatocellular Carcinomas: Comparison of Radiofrequency Ablation With or Without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization and Surgical Resection
    Tashiro, Hirotaka
    Aikata, Hiroshi
    Waki, Koji
    Amano, Hironobu
    Oshita, Akihiko
    Kobayashi, Tsuyoshi
    Tanimoto, Yoshisato
    Kuroda, Shintaro
    Tazawa, Hirofumi
    Chayama, Kazuaki
    Asahara, Toshimasa
    Ohdan, Hideki
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 104 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [23] RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION VERSUS SURGICAL RESECTION FOR THE TREATMENT OF EARLY STAGE HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA (HCC) - A LARGE MULTICENTRE STUDY
    Gory, I.
    Fink, M.
    Bell, S.
    Gow, P.
    Nicoll, A.
    Knight, V.
    Dev, A.
    Rode, A.
    Kitson, M.
    Bailey, M.
    Kemp, W.
    Roberts, S. K.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 56 : S392 - S393
  • [24] Surgical resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in treatment of Hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta analysis
    Jaganmohan, Sathya
    Agarwal, Suneal
    Kasturi, Krishna S.
    Sood, Gagan
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 134 (04) : A47 - A47
  • [25] A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma
    Feng, Kai
    Yan, Jun
    Li, Xiaowu
    Xia, Feng
    Ma, Kuansheng
    Wang, Shuguang
    Bie, Ping
    Dong, Jiahong
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 57 (04) : 794 - 802
  • [26] Surgical resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhotic liver
    Vivarelli, M
    Guglielmi, AF
    Ruzzenente, A
    Cucchetti, A
    Bellusci, R
    Cordiano, C
    Cavallari, A
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (01) : 102 - 107
  • [27] Treatment strategy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: Salvage transplantation, repeated resection, or radiofrequency ablation?
    Chan, Albert C. Y.
    Chan, See Ching
    Chok, Kenneth S. H.
    Cheung, Tan To
    Chiu, Dai Wing
    Poon, Ronnie T. P.
    Fan, Sheung Tat
    Lo, Chung Mau
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 19 (04) : 411 - 419
  • [28] Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma; Retrospective comparative study
    Cho, CM
    Kwon, KT
    Lee, DS
    Jeon, SW
    Lee, YD
    Lee, MK
    Seo, HE
    Park, CK
    Tak, WY
    Kweon, YO
    Kim, SK
    Choi, YH
    Hwang, YJ
    Kim, YIL
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2004, 40 : 75 - 75
  • [29] Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Radiofrequency Ablation or Resection?
    Feng, Ji
    Qi, Xiaolong
    Guo, Xiaozhong
    Qi, Xingshun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 (02): : 359 - 359
  • [30] Systematic review of surgical resection vs radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Alessandro Cucchetti
    Fabio Piscaglia
    Matteo Cescon
    Giorgio Ercolani
    Antonio Daniele Pinna
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, (26) : 4106 - 4118