Unintended Consequences of Products Liability: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Market

被引:4
|
作者
Helland, Eric [1 ,2 ]
Lakdawalla, Darius [3 ,4 ]
Malani, Anup [4 ,5 ]
Seabury, Seth A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Claremont McKenna Coll, Claremont, CA 91711 USA
[2] RAND, Santa Monica, CA 90401 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[4] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源
关键词
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE REFORM; CONSUMER MISPERCEPTIONS; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; TORT REFORM; DAMAGES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1093/jleo/ewaa017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We explain a surprising effect of tort liability in the market for prescription drugs. Greater punitive damage risk seems to increase prescription drug utilization in states without non-economic damage caps but decrease utilization in states with such caps. We offer an explanation for this puzzle. The vertical production process for drugs involves national upstream producers (drug companies) and local downstream producers (doctors). When a single state reallocates liability from downstream to upstream producers, national drug companies see little reason to alter their nationwide output decisions, but local physicians have incentives to increase their prescriptions in that state. The net result is higher local output. We show how this dynamic can explain our puzzle by demonstrating that punitive damages shift liability upstream from doctors to drug companies, but not when non-economic damages caps limit physician malpractice liability. We provide evidence explaining when, how, and why this type of liability shifting occurs
引用
收藏
页码:598 / 632
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条