共 50 条
Comparing total medical expenditure between patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants vs warfarin for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: evidence from VA-Medicare dual enrollees
被引:5
|作者:
Wong, Edwin S.
[1
,2
]
Done, Nicolae
[3
]
Zhao, Molly
[3
]
Woolley, Adam B.
[5
]
Prentice, Julia C.
[3
,4
]
Mull, Hillary J.
[3
,6
]
机构:
[1] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] VA Boston Healthcare Syst, Ctr Healthcare Org & Implementat Res CHOIR, Boston, MA USA
[4] Boston Univ, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] Northeastern Univ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Boston Univ, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源:
关键词:
STROKE PREVENTION;
SUBSTANCE USE;
DABIGATRAN;
SAFETY;
RISK;
EFFICACY;
D O I:
10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.8.1056
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are an alternative to warfarin for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Evidence demonstrating the efficacy and safety of DOACs has primarily been from clinical trial settings. The real-world effectiveness of DOACs in specific nontrial populations that differ in age, comorbidity burden, and socioeconomic status is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare total downstream medical expenditure between AF patients treated with warfarin and DOACs dually enrolled in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System and fee-for-service Medicare. METHODS: This was an exploratory treatment effectiveness study that analyzed VA administrative data and Medicare claims. We examined patients with an incident diagnosis for AF and initiated warfarin or DOAC treatment between 2012 and 2015. The primary outcome was total medical expenditure over 3 years following treatment initiation. To address potential informative censoring, we applied a multipart estimator that extends traditional 2-part models to separate differences between groups due to survival and cost accumulation effects. Inverse probability weighting was applied to address potential treatment selection bias. RESULTS: We identified 31,276 and 17,021 patients receiving warfarin and DOACs, respectively. Mean unadjusted (SD) expenditure was higher for warfarin ($56,265 [$96,666]) compared with DOAC patients ($32,736 [$52,470]). Compared with patients receiving DOACs, adjusted 3-year expenditure was $25,688 (P < 0.001) higher for patients receiving warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: VA patients with AF initiating warfarin incurred markedly higher downstream expenditure compared with similar patients receiving DOACs. The benefits of DOACs found in previous clinical trials were present in this population, suggesting that these DOACs may be the preferred option for treatment of AF in older VA patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1056 / 1066
页数:11
相关论文