Comparing total medical expenditure between patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants vs warfarin for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: evidence from VA-Medicare dual enrollees

被引:5
|
作者
Wong, Edwin S. [1 ,2 ]
Done, Nicolae [3 ]
Zhao, Molly [3 ]
Woolley, Adam B. [5 ]
Prentice, Julia C. [3 ,4 ]
Mull, Hillary J. [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle, WA 98108 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] VA Boston Healthcare Syst, Ctr Healthcare Org & Implementat Res CHOIR, Boston, MA USA
[4] Boston Univ, Dept Psychiat, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] Northeastern Univ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Boston Univ, Dept Surg, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
关键词
STROKE PREVENTION; SUBSTANCE USE; DABIGATRAN; SAFETY; RISK; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.8.1056
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are an alternative to warfarin for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Evidence demonstrating the efficacy and safety of DOACs has primarily been from clinical trial settings. The real-world effectiveness of DOACs in specific nontrial populations that differ in age, comorbidity burden, and socioeconomic status is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare total downstream medical expenditure between AF patients treated with warfarin and DOACs dually enrolled in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System and fee-for-service Medicare. METHODS: This was an exploratory treatment effectiveness study that analyzed VA administrative data and Medicare claims. We examined patients with an incident diagnosis for AF and initiated warfarin or DOAC treatment between 2012 and 2015. The primary outcome was total medical expenditure over 3 years following treatment initiation. To address potential informative censoring, we applied a multipart estimator that extends traditional 2-part models to separate differences between groups due to survival and cost accumulation effects. Inverse probability weighting was applied to address potential treatment selection bias. RESULTS: We identified 31,276 and 17,021 patients receiving warfarin and DOACs, respectively. Mean unadjusted (SD) expenditure was higher for warfarin ($56,265 [$96,666]) compared with DOAC patients ($32,736 [$52,470]). Compared with patients receiving DOACs, adjusted 3-year expenditure was $25,688 (P < 0.001) higher for patients receiving warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: VA patients with AF initiating warfarin incurred markedly higher downstream expenditure compared with similar patients receiving DOACs. The benefits of DOACs found in previous clinical trials were present in this population, suggesting that these DOACs may be the preferred option for treatment of AF in older VA patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1056 / 1066
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing Total Medical Costs between Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Evidence from the VA
    Wong, E.
    Done, N.
    Zhao, M.
    Woolley, A.
    Prentice, J.
    Mull, H.
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 55 : 79 - 80
  • [2] Comparing Warfarin and 4 Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Risk of Dementia in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
    Lee, So-Ryoung
    Choi, Eue-Keun
    Park, Sang-Hyun
    Jung, Jin-Hyung
    Han, Kyung-Do
    Oh, Seil
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    STROKE, 2021, 52 (11) : 3459 - 3468
  • [3] Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation Treatment: Rural and Urban Trends in Medicare Beneficiaries
    Norby, Faye L.
    Lutsey, Pamela L.
    Shippee, Nathan D.
    Chen, Lin Y.
    Henning-Smith, Carrie
    Alonso, Alvaro
    Walker, Rob F.
    Folsom, Aaron R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS, 2022, 22 (02) : 207 - 217
  • [4] Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation Treatment: Rural and Urban Trends in Medicare Beneficiaries
    Faye L. Norby
    Pamela L. Lutsey
    Nathan D. Shippee
    Lin Y. Chen
    Carrie Henning-Smith
    Alvaro Alonso
    Rob F. Walker
    Aaron R. Folsom
    American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 2022, 22 : 207 - 217
  • [5] Comparing Efficacy and Safety Between Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants or Warfarin After Direct Oral Anticoagulant Failure
    Hsieh, Meng-Tsang
    Liu, Chi-Hung
    Lin, Sheng-Hsiang
    Lin, Po-Yu
    Chang, Yu-Ming
    Wang, Chun-Min
    Chen, Chih-Hung
    Sung, Pi-Shan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2023, 12 (23):
  • [6] Safety of direct oral anticoagulants vs warfarin in patients with chronic liver disease and atrial fibrillation
    Goriacko, Pavel
    Veltri, Keith T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2018, 100 (05) : 488 - 493
  • [7] Medical Costs of Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Different Stroke Risks
    Deitelzweig S.
    Amin A.
    Jing Y.
    Makenbaeva D.
    Wiederkehr D.
    Lin J.
    Graham J.
    Cardiology and Therapy, 2013, 2 (2) : 165 - 170
  • [8] Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Medicare Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Atrial Fibrillation
    Wetmore, James B.
    Roetker, Nicholas S.
    Yan, Heng
    Reyes, Jorge L.
    Herzog, Charles A.
    STROKE, 2020, 51 (08) : 2364 - 2373
  • [9] Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin Among Obese Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
    Boivin-Proulx, Laurie-Anne
    Potter, Brian J.
    Dorais, Marc
    Perreault, Sylvie
    CJC OPEN, 2022, 4 (04) : 395 - 405
  • [10] Meta-Analysis Comparing Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Morbidly Obese Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
    Kido, Kazuhiko
    Shimizu, Mikiko
    Shiga, Tsuyoshi
    Hashiguchi, Masayuki
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 126 : 23 - 28