Premenopausal adnex masses:: Diagnostic accuracy of sonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography

被引:7
|
作者
Grab, D
Flock, F
Stöhr, I
Rieber, A
Nüssle, S
Brambs, HJ
Fenchel, S
Reske, SN
Kreienberg, R
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Frauenklin, D-89070 Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Ulm, Rontgendiagnost Abt, D-89070 Ulm, Germany
[3] Univ Ulm, Abt Nukl Med, D-89070 Ulm, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2000-8063
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: We analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of imaging techniques for predicting the benign or malignant status of adnexal masses in premenopausal women. Methods: 64 premenopausal women referred for laparoscopic surgery for asymptomatic and persisting adnexal masses were studied. Preoperatively the patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and sonography and Doppler sonography. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the imaging modalities were calculated with contingency tables. Results: At surgery 58 patients had benign and 6 had malignant tumors (2 carcinomas and 4 tumors of low malignant potential [borderline tumors]). Sonographic findings were suspicious for malignancy in 5 of 6 patients (sensitivity: 76%). The combination of sonography and a semiquantitative scoring system or Doppler sonography did not improve the diagnostic accuracy. MRI had the same sensitivity but higher specificity (86%) than sonography. PET detected both carcinomas but only 1 of 4 borderline tumors (specificity: 75%). Conclusion: The sensitivity of PET for the early detection of ovarian cancer is poor. Negative MRI or PET findings do not rule out early ovarian malignancy.
引用
收藏
页码:544 / 552
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Tumor Staging in Patients With Primary Breast Cancer A Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Grueneisen, Johannes
    Nagarajah, James
    Buchbender, Christian
    Hoffmann, Oliver
    Schaarschmidt, Benedikt Michael
    Poeppel, Thorsten
    Forsting, Michael
    Quick, Harald H.
    Umutlu, Lale
    Kinner, Sonja
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2015, 50 (08) : 505 - 513
  • [32] Optimizing Positron Emission Tomography Image Acquisition Protocols in Integrated Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Hartung-Knemeyer, Verena
    Beiderwellen, Karsten J.
    Buchbender, Christian
    Kuehl, Hilmar
    Lauenstein, Thomas C.
    Bockisch, Andreas
    Poeppel, Thorsten D.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (05) : 290 - 294
  • [33] EphA2 as a Diagnostic Imaging Target in Glioblastoma: A Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
    Puttick, Simon
    Stringer, Brett W.
    Day, Bryan W.
    Bruce, Zara C.
    Ensbey, Kathleen S.
    Mardon, Karine
    Cowin, Gary J.
    Thurecht, Kristofer J.
    Whittaker, Andrew K.
    Fay, Michael
    Boyd, Andrew W.
    Rose, Stephen
    MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2015, 14 : 385 - +
  • [34] Utility of positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging in musculoskeletal imaging
    Chaudhry, Ammar A.
    Gul, Maryam
    Gould, Elaine
    Teng, Mathew
    Baker, Kevin
    Matthews, Robert
    WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 8 (03): : 268 - 274
  • [35] Imaging of transplanted islets by positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography
    Sakata, Naoaki
    Yoshimatsu, Gumpei
    Tsuchiya, Haruyuki
    Aoki, Takeshi
    Mizuma, Masamichi
    Motoi, Fuyuhiko
    Katayose, Yu
    Kodama, Tetsuya
    Egawa, Shinichi
    Unno, Michiaki
    ISLETS, 2013, 5 (05) : 179 - 187
  • [36] Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: The next generation of multimodality imaging?
    Pichler, Bernd J.
    Wehrl, Hans F.
    Kolb, Armin
    Judenhofer, Martin S.
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2008, 38 (03) : 199 - 208
  • [37] Imaging prostate cancer: An update on positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Bouchelouche K.
    Turkbey B.
    Choyke P.
    Capala J.
    Current Urology Reports, 2010, 11 (3) : 180 - 190
  • [38] Imaging the living human brain: Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography
    Volkow, ND
    Rosen, B
    Farde, L
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1997, 94 (07) : 2787 - 2788
  • [39] Assessment of Combination of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Ovarian Masses
    Tsuboyama, Takahiro
    Tatsumi, Mitsuaki
    Onishi, Hiromitsu
    Nakamoto, Atsushi
    Kim, Tonsok
    Hori, Masatoshi
    Sakane, Makoto
    Hori, Yumiko
    Morii, Eiichi
    Hatazawa, Jun
    Tomiyama, Noriyuki
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2014, 49 (08) : 524 - 531
  • [40] Discrepancies between positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in a cohort of oncological patients
    Oh, Geon
    O'Mahoney, Eoin
    Jeavons, Susanne
    Law, Phillip
    Ngai, Stanley
    McGill, George
    Yu, Chris
    Miles, Kenneth A.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 64 (02) : 204 - 210