Experimental data for two different alternator configurations in a solar brayton power system

被引:0
|
作者
Mason, LS [1 ]
Shaltens, RK [1 ]
Espinosa, WD [1 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Lewis Res Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44135 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
A solar dynamic (SD) space power system has been under test at the NASA Lewis Research Center since 1994. The SD Ground Test Demonstration (GTD) system includes a solar concentrator, heat receiver with thermal energy storage, Brayton power conversion unit, and radiator installed in a thermal-vacuum chamber with a solar simulator. The Brayton unit has been operated with two different turboalternator-compressor (TAC) assemblies, one which included a Rice-Lundell alternator and another which incorporated a permanent magnet (PM) alternator. The Rice alternator was part of the mini-Brayton rotating unit, designed and built during the 1970's and refurbished for the GTD. The PM TAC was a development unit from the Joint US/Russian SD Flight Project. This paper highlights the operational differences (and similarities) between the Rice and PM TAC configurations including a comparative evaluation of startup characteristics and operating performance. The two alternator configurations were tested under similar thermal conditions, as an interchangeable component within the SD system. The electrical characteristics of the two units, however, dictated the use of significantly different power conditioning and control strategies. The electrical control architectures are described and compared. Test data are presented on TAC startup and system operating performance for both configurations.
引用
收藏
页码:454 / 459
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experimental investigation of an electromagnetic seismic isolation system with different configurations of inertance
    Lin, Ging-Long
    Chang, Chang-Ching
    Lin, Chih-Shiuan
    Lin, Chi-Chang
    Lin, Tzu-Ting
    Li, Yi-Huan
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2025, 595
  • [32] Subchannel and Power Allocation in Downlink VLC Under Different System Configurations
    Aboagye, Sylvester
    Ngatched, Telex M. N.
    Dobre, Octavia A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 21 (05) : 3179 - 3191
  • [33] Comparative evaluation of experimental ejector refrigeration system for different operating configurations
    Ugudur, Batuhan
    Direk, Mehmet
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 10 (02): : 321 - 329
  • [34] Experimental assessment of a solar vortex engine integrated with sensible TES at different collector configurations
    Al-Kayiem, Hussain H.
    Tukkee, Ali M.
    See, Yuan K.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 227
  • [35] Enhancement of integrated solar still using different new absorber configurations: An experimental approach
    Hansen, R. Samuel
    Murugavel, K. Kalidasa
    DESALINATION, 2017, 422 : 59 - 67
  • [36] An Enhanced Solar Hybrid Brayton and Rankine Cycles with Integrated Magnetohydrodynamic Conversion System for Electrical Power Generation
    Ayeleso, Ayokunle Oluwaseun
    Raji, Atanda Kamoru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT-IJRED, 2021, 10 (04): : 755 - 767
  • [37] Numerical and experimental comparison between two different blade configurations of a wind generator
    Alaimo, Andrea
    Lo Iacono, Francesco
    Navarra, Giacomo
    Pipitone, Giovanni
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2016, 136 : 526 - 537
  • [38] Thermodynamic analysis and comparison for different direct-heated supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles integrated into a solar thermal power tower system
    Zhu, Han-Hui
    Wang, Kun
    He, Ya-Ling
    ENERGY, 2017, 140 : 144 - 157
  • [39] Design of a Solar Power Management System for an Experimental UAV
    Shiau, Jaw-Kuen
    Ma, Der-Ming
    Yang, Pin-Ying
    Wang, Geng-Feng
    Gong, Jhij Hua
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 2009, 45 (04) : 1350 - 1360
  • [40] Capacity optimization and performance analysis of wind power-photovoltaic-concentrating solar power generation system integrating different S-CO2 Brayton cycle layouts
    Hu, Yangdi
    Zhai, Rongrong
    Liu, Lintong
    Yin, Hang
    Yang, Lizhong
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 433