Opportunities and challenges of active patient involvement in clinical research in Germany - from the perspectives of a patient representative, a clinical researcher and two staff members of research funding management

被引:2
|
作者
Schilling, Imke [1 ,2 ]
Bleidorn, Jutta [3 ]
Ehrmann, Udo [4 ]
Muller-Fries, Eva [5 ]
Rathjen, Kim Isabel [1 ,2 ]
Saedler, Katarzyna [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bremen, Abt Versorgungsforsch, Inst Publ Hlth & Pflegeforsch, Bremen, Germany
[2] Univ Bremen, Hlth Sci Bremen, Bremen, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Jena, Inst Allgemeinmed, Jena, Germany
[4] Bundesverband Prostatakrebs Selbsthilfe eV BPS, Bonn, Germany
[5] Univ Med, Deutsch Zentrum Luft & Raumfahrt eV DLR, DLR Projekttrager, Bereich Gesundheit,Abt Klin Forsch,Digitale Gesun, Bonn, Germany
关键词
Patient and public involvement; Germany; Impact; Selection; Education; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; HEALTH RESEARCH; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.zefq.2021.03.003
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Active involvement of patients in clinical research is increasingly demanded in Germany. It has great potential to increase the quality and relevance of research and to contribute to patient empowerment. However, patients, researchers and research funders have experienced that the implementation of patient involvement is accompanied by cultural, practical and personal challenges. The aim of this article is to discuss the opportunities and challenges of patient involvement in Germany from the perspective of the stakeholders involved. Method: A patient representative, a clinical researcher and two staff members from research funding management were invited to discuss the opportunities and challenges of patient involvement. Their perspectives were recorded in two written open survey rounds. The answers were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Result: In the opinion of the stakeholders involved, the increasing involvement of patients in clinical research is an opportunity to promote the practical relevance of research and the implementation of studies, to increase their acceptance by the target group and to improve the uptake of research results in practice. However, the implementation of patient involvement was also perceived as challenging. They described problems with regard to the acquisition and selection of patients, the training of the patients and the specifications and support structures for the implementation of patient involvement. Discussion: While patient involvement in clinical research offers great potential, the development of appropriate structures and framework conditions for its implementation is still virtually unestablished in Germany. This needs to include, among other things, creating a broader awareness of the potential of patient involvement, developing training programs for patients and researchers, providing sufficient, mainly project-independent resources and ensuring regular evaluations.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 75
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [21] Beyond the Diagnostic Process in MS - Patient Perception of Lumbar Puncture for Clinical Management or Research: Data from the UK MS Register
    Robinson, Rebecca
    Kee, Rachael
    Ramsay, Stephen
    Mckee, Jon
    Kennedy, Fiona
    Middleton, Rod
    Rodgers, Jeff
    Nicholas, Richard
    McDonnell, Gavin
    Hughes, Stella
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2021, 96 (15)
  • [22] Acute Care Management of the HIV-Infected Patient: A Report from the HIV Practice and Research Network of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy
    Durham, Spencer H.
    Badowski, Melissa E.
    Liedtke, Michelle D.
    Rathbun, R. Chris
    Fulco, Patricia Pecora
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2017, 37 (05): : 611 - 629
  • [23] More than the emperor's new clothes: enhancing meaningful patient and public involvement in trial oversight committees through qualitative research with eight clinical trials facing challenges
    Nicolson, Alex
    Daykin, Anne
    Coulman, Karen
    Clement, Clare
    Cramer, Helen
    Gamble, Carrol
    Macefield, Rhiannon
    McCann, Sharon
    Shorter, Gillian W.
    Sydes, Mathew R.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [24] Models and impact of patient and public involvement in studies carried out by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London: findings from ten case studies
    Annabelle South
    Bec Hanley
    Mitzy Gafos
    Ben Cromarty
    Richard Stephens
    Kate Sturgeon
    Karen Scott
    William J. Cragg
    Conor D. Tweed
    Jacqueline Teera
    Claire L. Vale
    [J]. Trials, 17
  • [25] Models and impact of patient and public involvement in studies carried out by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London: findings from ten case studies
    South, Annabelle
    Hanley, Bec
    Gafos, Mitzy
    Cromarty, Ben
    Stephens, Richard
    Sturgeon, Kate
    Scott, Karen
    Cragg, William J.
    Tweed, Conor D.
    Teera, Jacqueline
    Vale, Claire L.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [26] Erratum to: ‘Models and impact of patient and public involvement in studies carried out by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London: findings from ten case studies’
    Annabelle South
    Bec Hanley
    Mitzy Gafos
    Ben Cromarty
    Richard Stephens
    Kate Sturgeon
    Karen Scott
    William J. Cragg
    Conor D. Tweed
    Jacqueline Teera
    Claire L. Vale
    [J]. Trials, 17
  • [27] Models and impact of patient and public involvement in studies carried out by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London: findings from ten case studies (vol 17, 376, 2016)
    South, Annabelle
    Hanley, Bec
    Gafos, Mitzy
    Cromarty, Ben
    Stephens, Richard
    Sturgeon, Kate
    Scott, Karen
    Cragg, William J.
    Tweed, Conor D.
    Teera, Jacqueline
    Vale, Claire L.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2016, 17