A systematic review and meta-analysis on tubal ligation and breast cancer risk

被引:1
|
作者
Najdi, Nazila [1 ]
Esmailzadeh, Arezoo [2 ]
Shokrpour, Maryam [1 ]
Nikfar, Somayeh [1 ]
Razavi, Seyedeh Zahra [3 ]
Sepidarkish, Mahdi [4 ]
Maroufizadeh, Saman [5 ,6 ]
Safiri, Saeid [7 ]
Almasi-Hashiani, Amir [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Arak Univ Med Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Arak, Iran
[2] Baqiyatallah Univ Med Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Trauma Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Zanjan Univ Med Sci, Zanjan, Iran
[4] Babol Univ Med Sci, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Babol, Iran
[5] Guilan Univ Med Sci, Sch Hlth, Dept Biostat, Rasht, Iran
[6] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Aging Res Inst, Res Ctr Integrat Med Aging, Tabriz, Iran
[7] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Dept Community Med, Fac Med, Social Determinants Hlth Res Ctr, Tabriz, Iran
[8] Arak Univ Med Sci, Sch Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Golestan St, Arak, Iran
[9] Arak Univ Med Sci, Tradit & Complementary Med Res Ctr, Golestan St, Arak, Iran
关键词
Breast neoplasm; Breast cancer; Tubal sterilization; Tubal ligation; Meta-analysis; STERILIZATION; HYSTERECTOMY; RATIOS;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-022-02000-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Based on previous studies, it has been hypothesized that tube sterilization may be associated with a lower risk of breast cancer. This study aims to investigate the relationship between tubal ligation and the risk of breast cancer through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant non randomized studies published up to November 2020. Then, we screened the papers to include the eligible papers in the meta-analysis. Finally, we pooled the extracted results of individual studies to estimate the summary effect size. All analyses were done using Stata software version 13 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX). Results: Four hundred sixty-four papers were retrieved from PubMed/Medline (160), Scopus (165), and Web of Science (139), and 21 papers from Google Scholar and manual search of references in selected full texts. After the removal of duplicates and screening of the papers, 11 articles (6 cohort and 5 case-control study) were included in the final analysis. The results of cohort (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.97-1.0, I-2 = 21.1%) and case control studies (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.62-1.12, I-2 = 88.9%) revealed that tubal ligation was not significantly associated with breast cancer risk. Conclusion: According to our findings, tubal ligation cannot be considered as a risk factor associated with breast cancer risk.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review and meta-analysis on tubal ligation and breast cancer risk
    Nazila Najdi
    Arezoo Esmailzadeh
    Maryam Shokrpour
    Somayeh Nikfar
    Seyedeh Zahra Razavi
    Mahdi Sepidarkish
    Saman Maroufizadeh
    Saeid Safiri
    Amir Almasi-Hashiani
    Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [2] Tubal ligation and endometrial Cancer risk: a global systematic review and meta-analysis
    Laleh Loghmani
    Nafise Saedi
    Reza Omani-Samani
    Saeid Safiri
    Mahdi Sepidarkish
    Saman Maroufizadeh
    Arezoo Esmailzadeh
    Maryam Shokrpour
    Esmaeil Khedmati Morasae
    Amir Almasi-Hashiani
    BMC Cancer, 19
  • [3] Tubal ligation and endometrial Cancer risk: a global systematic review and meta-analysis
    Loghmani, Laleh
    Saedi, Nafise
    Omani-Samani, Reza
    Safiri, Saeid
    Sepidarkish, Mahdi
    Maroufizadeh, Saman
    Esmailzadeh, Arezoo
    Shokrpour, Maryam
    Morasae, Esmaeil Khedmati
    Almasi-Hashiani, Amir
    BMC CANCER, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [4] Tubal ligation and the risk of ovarian cancer: review and meta-analysis
    Cibula, D.
    Widschwendter, M.
    Majek, O.
    Dusek, L.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2011, 17 (01) : 55 - 67
  • [5] Salpingectomy vs tubal ligation for sterilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mills, Kerry
    Marchand, Greg
    Sainz, Katelyn
    Azadi, Ali
    Ware, Kelly
    Vallejo, Janelle
    Anderson, Sienna
    King, Alexa
    Osborn, Asya
    Ruther, Stacy
    Brazil, Giovanna
    Cieminski, Kaitlynne
    Hopewell, Sophia
    Rials, Lisa
    Klipp, Angela
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (03) : 258 - +
  • [6] Salpingectomy vs Tubal Ligation for Sterilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mills, Kerry
    Marchand, Greg
    Sainz, Katelyn
    Azadi, Ali
    Ware, Kelly
    Vallejo, Janelle
    Anderson, Sienna
    King, Alexa
    Osborn, Asya
    Ruther, Stacy
    Brazil, Giovanna
    Cieminski, Kaitlynne
    Hopewell, Sophia
    Rials, Lisa
    Klipp, Angela
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2021, 76 (02) : 97 - 98
  • [7] Migraine and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Peng, Cheng
    Wu, Kongyuan
    Chen, Xiwen
    Lang, Hui
    Li, Changling
    He, Li
    Chen, Ning
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2023, 23 (03) : E122 - E130
  • [8] Risk Factors of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Anothaisintawee, Thunyarat
    Wiratkapun, Cholatip
    Lerdsitthichai, Panuwat
    Kasamesup, Vijj
    Wongwaisayawan, Sansanee
    Srinakarin, Jiraporn
    Hirunpat, Siriporn
    Woodtichartpreecha, Piyanoot
    Boonlikit, Sarawan
    Teerawattananon, Yot
    Thakkinstian, Ammarin
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 25 (05) : 368 - 387
  • [9] Polyomaviruses and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mousavi, Tahoora
    Shokoohy, Fatemeh
    Moosazadeh, Mahmood
    INFECTIOUS AGENTS AND CANCER, 2025, 20 (01):
  • [10] Hypertension and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hedong Han
    Wei Guo
    Wentao Shi
    Yamei Yu
    Yunshuo Zhang
    Xiaofei Ye
    Jia He
    Scientific Reports, 7