Patient preferences for dry powder inhaler attributes in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in France: a discrete choice experiment

被引:20
|
作者
Hawken, Natalia [1 ]
Torvinen, Saku [2 ]
Neine, Mohamed-Elmoctar [3 ]
Amri, Ikbel [4 ]
Toumi, Mondher [3 ]
Aballea, Samuel [3 ]
Plich, Adam [2 ]
Roche, Nicolas [5 ]
机构
[1] Creativ Ceutical, Westblaak 92, NL-3012 KM Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Teva Pharmaceut Europe BV, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Creativ Ceutical SARL, 215 Rue Faubourg St Honore, F-75008 Paris, France
[4] Creativ Ceutical, Rue Lac Huron Residence Farah,Bloc B, F-1053 Les Berges Du Lac, France
[5] Univ Paris 05, Cochin Hosp Grp, AP HP, Resp & Intens Care Med, Paris, France
来源
BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE | 2017年 / 17卷
关键词
Discrete choice experiment; Asthma; COPD; Patient preference; Willingness to pay; METERED-DOSE INHALER; COPD; SATISFACTION; DEVICE; MANAGEMENT; UTILITIES; ERRORS; EASE;
D O I
10.1186/s12890-017-0439-x
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are often used in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) therapies. Using the discrete choice experiment (DCE) methodology, this study conducted in France was designed to assess patients' preferences for different attributes of DPIs. Methods: Attributes of DPIs were defined based on a literature review, patient focus group discussions and interviews with healthcare professionals (qualitative phase of the study). An online survey was then conducted among French patients with asthma or COPD to elicit patient preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for these attributes using the DCE methodology (quantitative phase). A fractional factorial design including three blocks of 12 choice sets was created. Each choice set comprised three alternatives: two fictitious inhalers and the patient's current inhaler. Marginal utilities were estimated using a ranked ordered logit model. Interactions between attributes and disease (asthma or COPD) were tested. Results: Six DPI attributes were defined based on the qualitative phase: ease of use/fool-proof priming; accurate and easy-to-read dose counter; dose confirmation; hygiene of the mouthpiece; flexibility of the device handling; ability to use the inhaler with breathing difficulties. Overall, 201 patients with asthma and 93 with COPD were included in the online survey. Patients with asthma placed most value on an inhaler that requires one step for dose preparation (WTP (sic)4.83 [95% CI:(sic)3.77-(sic)5.90], relative to an inhaler requiring four steps) and one that could be used during episodes of breathing difficulties (WTP(sic)4.49 [95% CI:(sic)2.95-(sic)6.02]). Patients with COPD placed most value on an inhaler that could be used during episodes of breathing difficulties (WTP(sic)7.70 [95% CI: (sic) 5.65-(sic)9.76]) and on the accuracy of the dose counter (WTP(sic)5.87 [95% CI:(sic)3.98-(sic)7.77]). Conclusion: This study suggests that asthma and COPD patients would be willing to change their inhaler if they were offered the option of a new inhaler with improved characteristics and they place a high value on an inhaler with ease of use during breathing difficulty episodes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Handling of Diskus Dry Powder Inhaler in Chinese Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients
    Li, Huaidong
    Chen, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Zhaorui
    Dong, Xiaoxuan
    Zhang, Guogang
    Zhang, Hui
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL MEDICINE AND PULMONARY DRUG DELIVERY, 2014, 27 (03) : 219 - 227
  • [22] Patient Preferences for Attributes of Biologic Treatments in Moderate to Severe Asthma: A Discrete Choice Experiment Study
    Yang, Min
    Chao, Jingdong
    Fillbrunn, Mirko
    Mallya, Usha G.
    Wang, Min -Jung
    Franke, Leigh
    Cohn, Lauren
    Kamat, Siddhesh
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2022, 16 : 2649 - 2661
  • [23] Digital inhaler preferences of asthma patients and healthcare providers: a discrete choice experiment
    Eikholt, Amber
    Van Boven, Job
    Tay, Tunn Ren
    Lee, Joy
    Hew, Mark
    Rashed, Asia N.
    Baggott, Christina
    Makhecha, Sukeshi
    Fleming, Louise
    Costello, Richard
    Chan, Amy
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2023, 62
  • [24] Patient preferences in obstructive sleep apnea—a discrete choice experiment
    Marcel Braun
    Sarah Dietz-Terjung
    Christian Taube
    Christoph Schoebel
    Sleep and Breathing, 2022, 26 : 1717 - 1727
  • [25] Real-world experience with a new dry powder inhaler for asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): patient satisfaction, preference and ease of use
    Gillissen, A.
    Schneidereit, R.
    Gessner, C.
    Herth, F. J.
    Kanniess, F.
    Kardos, P.
    Lommatzsch, M.
    Windisch, W.
    ALLERGY, 2016, 71 : 258 - 258
  • [26] Inappropriate Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate with Dry Powder Inhaler in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
    Shih-Yu Chen
    Chun-Kai Huang
    Hui-Chuan Peng
    Chong-Jen Yu
    Jung-Yien Chien
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [27] Inappropriate Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate with Dry Powder Inhaler in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
    Chen, Shih-Yu
    Huang, Chun-Kai
    Peng, Hui-Chuan
    Yu, Chong-Jen
    Chien, Jung-Yien
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [28] Expert Panel Resolution on Personified Choice of an Inhaler in Patients with Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
    Emelyanov, A. V.
    Avdeev, S. N.
    Aisanov, Z. R.
    Vizel, A. A.
    Ilina, N. I.
    Knyazheskaya, N. P.
    Leshchenko, I. V.
    Nenasheva, N. M.
    Styrt, E. A.
    Titova, O. N.
    TERAPEVTICHESKII ARKHIV, 2016, 88 (08) : 135 - U147
  • [29] A Discrete Choice Experiment to Assess Patient Preferences for Asthma Rescue Therapy and Disease Management
    Israel, Elliot
    Farooqui, Nabeel
    Gillette, Chris
    Gilbert, Ileen
    Gandhi, Hitesh
    Tervonen, Tommi
    Balantac, Zaneta
    Thomas, Caitlin
    Krucien, Nicolas
    George, Maureen
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2023, 11 (09): : 2781 - +
  • [30] Inhaler technique in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    Janezic, A.
    Locatelli, I.
    Morgan, T.
    Kos, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2016, 38 (02) : 498 - 499