Rapid COVID-19 antigenic tests: Usefulness of a modified method for diagnosis

被引:14
|
作者
Soleimani, Reza [1 ]
Deckers, Corentin [1 ]
Huang, Te-Din [1 ]
Bogaerts, Pierre [1 ]
Evrard, Stephanie [1 ]
Wallemme, Isaline [1 ]
Habib, Boutaina [1 ]
Rouze, Pauline [1 ]
Denis, Olivier [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Lab Med, Serv Med Microbiol, CHU UCL Namur, Site Mt Godinne,1 Dr Gaston Therasse Ave, B-5530 Yvoir, Belgium
关键词
antigen; BioSpeedia; COVID-19; Panbio; RT-qPCR; SARS-CoV-2;
D O I
10.1002/jmv.27094
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The current reliable recommended test for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnosis is quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Rapid antigen test devices could be useful as they are less expensive, faster without the need of specialized laboratories to perform the test. We report the performances of two rapid immunochromatographic antigen testing devices compared with RT-qPCR for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection in nasopharyngeal samples. We carried out a lateral-flow tests study on 401 nasopharyngeal swab samples from nonduplicated suspected COVID-19 subjects. An equal volume of universal transport medium tubes-containing samples (dilution ratio = 1:15) were added to the manufacturer's extraction buffer solution (dilution ratio = 1:2) and analyzed on BioSpeedia COVID19Speed-Antigen Test and on Abbott Panbio (TM) COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test, devices. Qualitative results were compared to those obtained by the RT-qPCR (Allplex (TM) SARS-CoV-2 Assay Seegene). Based on our data, the overall sensitivity for BioSpeedia and Panbio devices was estimated at 65.5% and 75.0%, respectively. The sensitivity was greater for cycle threshold values less than 25 achieving 90.4 and 96.8 for BioSpeedia and Panbio devices, respectively. A perfect specificity of 100.0% was observed for both devices.
引用
收藏
页码:5655 / 5659
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Advancement in Nanomaterials for Rapid Sensing, Diagnosis, and Prevention of COVID-19
    Das, Dipak Kumar
    Kumar, Anuj
    Vashistha, Vinod Kumar
    NANO LIFE, 2021, 11 (03)
  • [42] Evaluation of the Usability of a Rapid Antigen Test for the Diagnosis of COVID-19 Disease in Comparison with the Molecular Method
    Cubuk, Fatih
    Kafa, Ayse Humeyra Taskin
    Baykus, Hatice Seyma
    Hasbek, Mursit
    FLORA INFEKSIYON HASTALIKLARI VE KLINIK MIKROBIYOLOJI DERGISI, 2022, 28 (03): : 433 - 439
  • [43] Scaling up COVID-19 rapid antigen tests: promises and challenges
    Peeling, Rosanna W.
    Olliaro, Piero L.
    Boeras, Debrah, I
    Fongwen, Noah
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 21 (09): : E290 - E295
  • [44] COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Tests: Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Literature
    Yeung, Andy Wai Kan
    Parvanov, Emil D.
    Nawaz, Faisal A.
    Rayan, Rehab A.
    Kletecka-Pulker, Maria
    Willschke, Harald
    Atanasov, Atanas G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (19)
  • [45] Partnership to Make 120 Million COVID-19 Rapid Tests Available
    Kuehn, Bridget M.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 324 (19): : 1933 - 1933
  • [46] Covid-19: Which rapid tests is the UK pinning its hopes on?
    Wise, Jacqui
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 371
  • [47] Validity and usefulness of COVID-19 models
    Eker, Sibel
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [48] Buyer beware: inflated claims of sensitivity for rapid COVID-19 tests
    Fitzpatrick, Meagan C.
    Pandey, Abhishek
    Wells, Chad R.
    Sah, Pratha
    Galvani, Alison P.
    LANCET, 2021, 397 (10268): : 24 - 25
  • [49] Rapid tests for quantification of infectiousness are urgently required in patients with COVID-19
    Pan, Daniel
    Sze, Shirley
    Abraham, Shalin
    Williams, Caroline M.
    Tang, Julian W.
    Barer, Mike R.
    Pareek, Manish
    LANCET MICROBE, 2021, 2 (07): : E286 - E287
  • [50] Covid-19: UK hospitals to get rapid tests from September
    Mahase, Elisabeth
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 370 : m3087