Biomechanical investigation on refixation of tuberosities on shoulder prostheses

被引:0
|
作者
Fleischer, J. [1 ]
Schleyer, A. [2 ]
Nassutt, R. [3 ]
Grundei, H. [3 ]
Grittner, U. [4 ]
Hopp, S. J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Marienkrankenhaus St Wendel, Klin Orthopadie & Unfallchirurg, D-66606 St Wendel, Germany
[2] FH Lubeck, Biomech Labor, Lubeck, Germany
[3] ESKA Implants AG, Abt Forsch & Entwicklung, Lubeck, Germany
[4] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Inst Biometrie & Klin Epidemiol, Berlin, Germany
[5] Univ Klinikum Saarlandes, Klin Unfall Hand & Wiederherstellungschirurg, Homburg, Germany
来源
UNFALLCHIRURG | 2010年 / 113卷 / 08期
关键词
Proximal humerus fracture; Shoulder endoprosthesis; Tuberosity refixation; Biomechanical tests; Suture materials; PROXIMAL HUMERUS; PRIMARY HEMIARTHROPLASTY; GREATER TUBEROSITY; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; FRACTURES; ARTHROPLASTY; HEAD; FIXATION; PART;
D O I
10.1007/s00113-010-1817-5
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Elderly patients suffering from complex, non-reconstructable fractures of the proximal humerus are commonly treated by primary implantation of a shoulder endoprosthesis. One of the most critical factors for success or failure of treatment is still the refixation of the tuberosities. Using sheep infraspinatus tendons with attached tuberosities three different suture materials were investigated. For 2 of the suture materials 4 tests were accomplished and 5 tests were carried out for the third suture material. A material testing machine was used to perform cyclic loading tests (20 mm/min, F-min = 50 N, F-max = 100 N, respectively after 50 cycles: F-max + 50 N until failure). The results showed large variations in the average maximum forces (152.4 N for suture 1, 219.9 N for suture 2 and 452.3 N for suture 3). All tests showed a high initial lengthening and caused incision-like defects in the bone or tendon and led to failure and high displacement of the tuberosities. Due to these results suture materials have a limited usefulness for refixation of tuberosities as an increased risk of obstruction for bony consolidation can result.
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 646
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanische Untersuchung zur Refixation der Tuberkula an FrakturschulterendoprothesenBietet die Rekonstruktion der Tuberkula mittels unterschiedlicher Nahtmaterialien eine ausreichende Stabilität?Biomechanical investigation on refixation of tuberosities on shoulder prosthesesDoes refixation with different suture materials offer enough stability?
    J. Fleischer
    A. Schleyer
    R. Nassutt
    H. Grundei
    U. Grittner
    S.J. Hopp
    Der Unfallchirurg, 2010, 113 (8): : 641 - 646
  • [2] Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization. Biomechanical value of various refixation techniques
    Pilge, H.
    Imhoff, A. B.
    ARTHROSKOPIE, 2007, 20 (03) : 186 - 192
  • [3] BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF STABILITY AND FIXATION STRENGTH OF TOTAL SHOULDER PROSTHESES
    FUKUDA, K
    CHEN, CM
    COFIELD, RH
    CHAO, EYS
    ORTHOPEDICS, 1988, 11 (01) : 141 - 149
  • [4] BIOMECHANICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME AT THE SHOULDER
    WUELKER, N
    PLITZ, W
    ROETMAN, B
    ROSSIG, S
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 1995, 133 (01): : 61 - 66
  • [5] A CLINICAL AND BIOMECHANICAL INVESTIGATION OF FINGER JOINT PROSTHESES
    FLATT, AE
    FISCHER, GW
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1967, A 49 (03): : 580 - &
  • [6] Shoulder prostheses treating cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative biomechanical study
    De Wilde, LF
    Audenaert, EA
    Berghs, BM
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2004, 22 (06) : 1222 - 1230
  • [7] Biomechanical strength and failure mechanism of different tubercula refixation methods within the framework of an arthroplasty for shoulder fracture
    Fleischer, J.
    Schleyer, A.
    Nassutt, R.
    Grittner, U.
    Ojodu, I.
    Hopp, S. J.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2017, 103 (02) : 165 - 169
  • [8] Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization : Biomechanical value of various refixation techniques [Arthroskopische Schulterstabilisierung : Biomechanische Wertigkeit Verschiedener Refixationstechniken]
    Pilge H.
    Imhoff A.B.
    Arthroskopie, 2007, 20 (3) : 186 - 192
  • [9] Shoulder prostheses
    Wiedemann, E.
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 2006, 109 (12): : 1073 - 1083
  • [10] PROSTHESES OF THE SHOULDER
    APOIL, A
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 1986, 15 (15): : 685 - 687