Costs and benefits of communal rearing to female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)

被引:43
|
作者
Hayes, LD [1 ]
Solomon, NG [1 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Dept Zool, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
communal rearing; plural breeding; singular breeding; voles; Microtus;
D O I
10.1007/s00265-004-0815-4
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Communal rearing of offspring may help mothers maximize their investment in offspring at a reduced cost to their own bodily condition, thus maximizing their potential for reproductive success. The objective of this study was to quantify the costs and benefits of communal rearing to prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) pups and mothers. Mothers were assigned to one of three social units: solitary mothers, singularly breeding groups (i.e. one mother and one non-reproductive sister) and plurally breeding groups (i.e. two lactating sisters). For each type of social unit, some replicates were provided with food ad libitum, while others were provided with limited food. The body mass of focal mothers (i.e. the first mother to produce a litter) was a significant predictor of pup growth. Regardless of food availability, litters of focal mothers in plurally breeding groups gained more weight than litters reared by solitary mothers. Pups reared in singularly breeding groups were intermediate in weight gain, but did not gain significantly more weight than solitary offspring. There was no difference in the body mass of focal mothers from each type of social unit, regardless of food availability. Within plurally breeding groups, the weight gain of the two litters and body mass of focal and second mothers did not differ. However, focal mothers from plurally breeding groups nursed fewer pups than solitary mothers and also fewer pups than their nestmates when food was limited. Our results suggest that plural breeding results in greater fitness to mothers than solitary and singular breeding.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 593
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effects of oxytocin and vasopressin on partner preferences in male and female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
    Cho, MM
    DeVries, AC
    Williams, JR
    Carter, CS
    BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 113 (05) : 1071 - 1079
  • [22] Multi-male mating by paired and unpaired female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
    Wolff, JO
    Mech, SG
    Dunlap, AS
    Hodges, KE
    BEHAVIOUR, 2002, 139 : 1147 - 1160
  • [23] Dendritic arbor of neurons in the hypothalamic ventromedial nucleus in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
    Ferri, Sarah L.
    Rohrbach, Carlos J.
    Way, Samantha E.
    Curtis, Kathleen S.
    Curtis, J. Thomas
    Flanagan-Cato, Loretta M.
    HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR, 2013, 63 (01) : 173 - 179
  • [24] PHOTOPERIODIC EFFECTS ON STEROID NEGATIVE FEEDBACK IN FEMALE PRAIRIE VOLES (MICROTUS-OCHROGASTER)
    MOFFATT, CA
    GERBER, JM
    BLOM, JMC
    KRIEGSFELD, LJ
    NELSON, RJ
    GENERAL AND COMPARATIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1995, 100 (01) : 92 - 95
  • [25] Comparison of methods for determining dominance rank in male and female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
    Lanctot, RB
    Best, LB
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 2000, 81 (03) : 734 - 745
  • [26] Effects of isolation on sibling recognition in prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster
    Miño, GPY
    Tang-Martínez, Z
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1999, 57 : 1091 - 1098
  • [27] The impact of supplemental food on movements of prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
    Slade, NA
    Russell, LA
    Doonan, TJ
    JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1997, 78 (04) : 1149 - 1155
  • [28] ULTRASONIC VOCALIZATIONS BY ADULT PRAIRIE VOLES, MICROTUS-OCHROGASTER
    LEPRI, JJ
    THEODORIDES, M
    WYSOCKI, CJ
    EXPERIENTIA, 1988, 44 (03): : 271 - 273
  • [29] Individual Discrimination by Odors in Sibling Prairie Voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
    Zuleyma Tang-Martínez
    Andrea Bixler
    Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2009, 35 : 400 - 404
  • [30] Multiple paternity in socially monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
    Solomon, NG
    Keane, B
    Knoch, LR
    Hogan, PJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2004, 82 (10) : 1667 - 1671