Seismic Fragility Analysis of Monopile Offshore Wind Turbines under Different Operational Condition

被引:64
|
作者
Mo, Renjie [1 ]
Kang, Haigui [1 ]
Li, Miao [2 ]
Zhao, Xuanlie [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Coastal & Offshore Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] Charles Sturt Univ, Engn, Fac Business Justice & Behav Sci, Panorama Ave, Bathurst, NSW 2795, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
monopile offshore wind turbine; seismic response; truncated incremental dynamic analysis; fragility analysis; load combination; TUNED MASS DAMPERS; FOUNDATION; EARTHQUAKE; WAVE; METHODOLOGY; PROTOTYPE;
D O I
10.3390/en10071037
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Offshore wind turbines in seismic active areas suffer from earthquake impacts. In this study, seismic fragility analysis of a monopile offshore wind turbine considering different operational conditions was performed. A finite element model for a 5 MW monopile offshore wind turbine was developed using the OpenSees platform. The interaction between the monopile and the seabed soil was modeled as a beam-on-nonlinear-winkler-foundation (BNWF). Anonlinear time history truncated incremental dynamic analysis (TIDA) was conducted to obtain seismic responses and engineering demand parameters. Potential damage states (DSs) were defined as excessive displacement at the nacelle, rotation at the tower top, and the allowable and yield stresses at the transition piece. Fragility curves were plotted to assess the probability of exceeding different damage states. It was found that seismic responses of the wind turbine are considerably influenced by environmental wind and wave loads. Subject to earthquake motions, wind turbines in normal operation at the rated wind speed experience higher levels of probability of exceeding damage states than those in other operational conditions, i. e., in idling or operating at higher or lower wind speed conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seismic Fragility Analysis of Offshore Wind Turbines Considering Site-Specific Ground Responses
    Ngo, Duc-Vu
    Lee, Sang-Il
    Kim, Dong-Hyawn
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (23)
  • [22] Identification of equivalent wind and wave loads for monopile-supported offshore wind turbines in operating condition
    Liang, Jun
    Fu, Yuhao
    Wang, Ying
    Ou, Jinping
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 237
  • [23] Failure mode of monopile foundation for offshore wind turbines under monotonic loading
    Wang, Junling
    Yan, Shuwang
    Huo, Zhiliang
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING II, PTS 1-4, 2013, 256-259 : 1071 - 1074
  • [24] Wave disturbance rejection for monopile offshore wind turbines
    Smilden, Emil
    Bachynski, Erin E.
    Sorensen, Asgeir J.
    Amdahl, Jorgen
    WIND ENERGY, 2019, 22 (01) : 89 - 108
  • [25] DYNAMIC MODEL TEST OF MONOPILE FOR OFFSHORE WIND TURBINES
    Hanssen, Stian Baardsgaard
    Eiksund, Gudmund
    33RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, 2014, VOL 3, 2014,
  • [26] Dynamic response analysis of monopile offshore wind turbines to seismic and environmental loading considering the stiffness degradation of clay
    Cheng, Xinglei
    Wang, Tianju
    Zhang, Jianxin
    Wang, Piguang
    Tu, Wenbo
    Li, Wenqian
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2023, 155
  • [27] Soil-monopile interactions for offshore wind turbines
    Cui, Liang
    Bhattacharya, Subhamoy
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING AND COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2016, 169 (04) : 171 - 182
  • [28] A novel hybrid monopile foundation for offshore wind turbines
    Ma, Hongwang
    Yang, Jun
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2020, 198
  • [29] Contribution of the rotational kinematic interaction to the seismic response of monopile-supported offshore wind turbines
    Medina, Cristina
    alamo, Guillermo M.
    Padron, Luis A.
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2023, 280
  • [30] Seismic response of monopile offshore wind turbines in liquefiable sand considering vertical ground motion
    Wang, Piguang
    Wang, Baoxin
    Cheng, Xinglei
    Zhao, Mi
    Du, Xiuli
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2025, 189