A cost-benefit analysis of landfill mining and material recycling in China

被引:85
|
作者
Zhou, Chuanbin [1 ]
Gong, Zhe [1 ]
Hu, Junsong [1 ]
Cao, Aixin [1 ]
Liang, Hanwen [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Ecoenvironm Sci Res Ctr, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
关键词
Landfill mining; Material recycling; Cost-benefit analysis (CBA); Economic feasibility; Net present value (NPV);
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.029
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Landfill mining is an environmentally-friendly technology that combines the concepts of material recycling and sustainable waste management, and it has received a great deal of worldwide attention because of its significant environmental and economic potential in material recycling, energy recovery, land reclamation and pollution prevention. This work applied a cost-benefit analysis model for assessing the economic feasibility, which is important for promoting landfill mining. The model includes eight indicators of costs and nine indicators of benefits. Four landfill mining scenarios were designed and analyzed based on field data. The economic feasibility of landfill mining was then evaluated by the indicator of net present value (NPV). According to our case study of a typical old landfill mining project in China (Yingchun landfill), rental of excavation and hauling equipment, waste processing and material transportation were the top three costs of landfill mining, accounting for 88.2% of the total cost, and the average cost per unit of stored waste was 12.7 USD ton(-1). The top three benefits of landfill mining were electricity generation by incineration, land reclamation and recycling soil-like materials. The NPV analysis of the four different scenarios indicated that the Yingchun landfill mining project could obtain a net positive benefit varying from 1.92 million USD to 16.63 million USD. However, the NPV was sensitive to the mode of land reuse, the availability of energy recovery facilities and the possibility of obtaining financial support by avoiding post-closure care. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 198
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Barriers to promoting prefabricated construction in China: A cost-benefit analysis
    Hong, Jingke
    Shen, Geoffrey Qiping
    Li, Zhengdao
    Zhang, Boyu
    Zhang, Wanqiu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 649 - 660
  • [22] The Cost-Benefit Fallacy: Why Cost-Benefit Analysis Is Broken and How to Fix It
    Flyvbjerg, Bent
    Bester, Dirk W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2021, 12 (03) : 395 - 419
  • [23] Incommensurability and cost-benefit analysis
    Adler, M
    [J]. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1998, 146 (05) : 1371 - 1418
  • [24] Beware the cost-benefit analysis
    Spence, Des
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [25] Cost-Benefit Analysis in Reasoning
    Alaoui, Larbi
    Penta, Antonio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2022, : 881 - 925
  • [26] Co-recycling of sludge and municipal solid waste: A cost-benefit analysis
    Butt, EP
    Morse, GK
    Guy, JA
    Lester, JN
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 19 (12) : 1163 - 1175
  • [27] In Defence of Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Ergas, Henry
    [J]. AGENDA-A JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND REFORM, 2009, 16 (03) : 31 - 40
  • [28] A cost-benefit analysis of the downstream impacts of e-waste recycling in Pakistan
    Shaikh, Salsabil
    Thomas, Keith
    Zuhair, Segu
    Magalini, Federico
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 118 : 302 - 312
  • [29] Pediatric cost-benefit analysis
    Schulze-Gattermann, H
    Illg, A
    Lesinski-Schiedat, A
    Schoenermark, M
    Bertram, B
    Lenarz, T
    [J]. LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2003, 82 (05) : 322 - 329
  • [30] Cost-benefit analysis and population
    Broome, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2000, 29 (02): : 953 - 970