Informed Consent for Online Research-Is Anybody Reading?: Assessing Comprehension and Individual Differences in Readings of Digital Consent Forms

被引:12
|
作者
Geier, Caitlin [1 ]
Adams, Robyn B. [2 ]
Mitchell, Katharine M. [2 ]
Holtz, Bree E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Media & Informat, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Advertising & Publ Relat, 404 Wilson Rd,Rm 309, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
informed consent; consent forms; research ethics committee; IRB review; comprehension; interactivity; self-efficacy; trust; SELF-EFFICACY; ATTITUDES; TRUST; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1177/15562646211020160
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Informed consent is an important part of the research process; however, some participants either do not read or skim the consent form. When participants do not read or comprehend informed consent, then they may not understand the potential benefits, risks, or details of the study before participating. This study used previous research to develop experimentally manipulated online consent forms utilizing various presentations of the consent form and interactive elements. Participants (n = 576) were randomly exposed to one of six form variations. Results found that the highly interactive condition was significantly better for comprehension than any of the other conditions. The highly interactive condition also performed better for readability, though not significantly. Further research should explore the effects of interactive elements to combat habituation and to engage participants with the parts of the consent form unique to the study.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 164
页数:11
相关论文
共 7 条