The ipsilateral motor cortex does not contribute to long-latency stretch reflex amplitude at the wrist

被引:2
|
作者
Fox, Jonathan
Shemmell, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Sch Phys Educ, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
来源
BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR | 2014年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
Flexor; posture; pyramidal tracts; stroke; upper extremity; SILENT PERIOD; STIMULATION; MONKEY; MODULATION; RESPONSES; STROKE; BRAIN; PROJECTIONS; VELOCITY; FOREARM;
D O I
10.1002/brb3.189
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: A capacity for modulating the amplitude of the long-latency stretch reflex (LLSR) allows us to successfully interact with a physical world with a wide range of different mechanical properties. It has recently been demonstrated that stretch reflex modulation is impaired in both arms following monohemispheric stroke, suggesting that reflex regulation may involve structures on both sides of the motor system. Methods: We examined the involvement of both primary motor cortices in healthy reflex regulation by eliciting stretch reflexes during periods of suppression of the motor cortices contra-and ipsilateral to the extensor carpi radialis in the nondominant arm. Results: LLSRs were significantly attenuated during suppression of the contralateral, but not ipsilateral, motor cortex. Modulation of the LLSR was not affected by suppression of either primary motor cortex. Conclusion: Our results confirm the involvement of the contralateral motor cortex in the transmission of the LLSR, but suggest that the ipsilateral motor cortex plays no role in reflex transmission and that neither motor cortex is involved in stability-dependent modulation of the LLSR. The implications of these results for reflex impairments following stroke are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 69
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Goal-dependent modulation of the long-latency stretch response at the shoulder, elbow, and wrist
    Weiler, Jeffrey
    Gribble, Paul L.
    Pruszynski, J. Andrew
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 114 (06) : 3242 - 3254
  • [22] Proposed cortical and sub-cortical contributions to the long-latency stretch reflex in the forearm
    Gwyn N. Lewis
    Melody A. Polych
    Winston D. Byblow
    Experimental Brain Research, 2004, 156 : 72 - 79
  • [23] Proposed cortical and sub-cortical contributions to the long-latency stretch reflex in the forearm
    Lewis, GN
    Polych, MA
    Byblow, WD
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 156 (01) : 72 - 79
  • [24] Instruction-dependent modulation of the long-latency stretch reflex is associated with indicators of startle
    Ravichandran, Vengateswaran J.
    Honeycutt, Claire F.
    Shemmell, Jonathan
    Perreault, Eric J.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2013, 230 (01) : 59 - 69
  • [25] Instruction-dependent modulation of the long-latency stretch reflex is associated with indicators of startle
    Vengateswaran J. Ravichandran
    Claire F. Honeycutt
    Jonathan Shemmell
    Eric J. Perreault
    Experimental Brain Research, 2013, 230 : 59 - 69
  • [26] Influence of kinesthetic motor imagery and effector specificity on the long-latency stretch response
    Forgaard, Christopher J.
    Franks, Ian M.
    Maslovat, Dana
    Chua, Romeo
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 122 (05) : 2187 - 2200
  • [27] EVIDENCE THAT THE LONG-LATENCY STRETCH RESPONSES OF THE HUMAN WRIST EXTENSOR MUSCLE INVOLVE A TRANSCEREBRAL PATHWAY
    GOODIN, DS
    AMINOFF, MJ
    SHIH, PY
    BRAIN, 1990, 113 : 1075 - 1091
  • [28] INTERACTION BETWEEN SHORT-LATENCY AND LONG-LATENCY COMPONENTS OF THE HUMAN STRETCH REFLEX DURING SINUSOIDAL STRETCHING
    MATTHEWS, PBC
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1993, 462 : 503 - 527
  • [29] DYNAMICS OF A LONG-LATENCY REFLEX PATHWAY IN THE MONKEY
    BAWA, P
    STEIN, RB
    TATTON, WG
    BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 1979, 34 (02) : 107 - 110
  • [30] Bilateral impairments in task-dependent modulation of the long-latency stretch reflex following stroke
    Trumbower, Randy D.
    Finley, James M.
    Shemmell, Jonathan B.
    Honeycutt, Claire F.
    Perreault, Eric J.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 124 (07) : 1373 - 1380