Benefit-risk assessment: the use of clinical utility index

被引:31
|
作者
Ouellet, Daniele [1 ]
机构
[1] GlaxoSmithKline, Clin Pharmacol Modeling & Simulat, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
关键词
benefit-risk; decision analysis; exposure-response; multi-attribute decision; therapeutic index; utility function; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; DECISION-ANALYSIS; MODEL; OXYBUTYNIN; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1517/14740330903499265
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Importance of the field: Measurement of the tradeoff between efficacy and safety is rarely done in a quantitative fashion. The use of a clinical utility index (CUI) has been proposed as a tool to aid in this assessment. The methodology from multi-attribute decision analysis is in its early stage in drug development and can be used to understand the therapeutic index and the value relative to the competitive landscape. Areas covered in this review: Different examples and applications of the use of CUI are reviewed and key steps involved in the development described. These include: i) characterization of the exposure response of efficacy and safety end points; ii) definition of clinically meaningful parameters; iii) selection and weighting of important attributes and iv) sensitivity analysis and measurement of uncertainty. What the reader will gain: An understanding of the value and limitations of CUI in drug development. Take home message: The use of a CUI for quantitative assessment of benefit/risk is most useful when there are multiple attributes involved in a decision to better understand the relevance of each attribute and when differentiation from competitors is critical to the success of a compound. Although development of CUI may be time- and resource-consuming, it allows clear and transparent decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 300
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Benefit-risk assessment of raloxifene in postmenopausal osteoporosis
    Cranney, A
    Adachi, JD
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2005, 28 (08) : 721 - 730
  • [32] On a Stepwise Quantitative Approach for Benefit-Risk Assessment
    Weili He
    Yaxuan Sun
    Qing Li
    Sabrina Wan
    [J]. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2017, 51 : 625 - 634
  • [34] A benefit-risk assessment of caffeine as an analgesic adjuvant
    Zhang, WY
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2001, 24 (15) : 1127 - 1142
  • [35] Benefit-risk assessment for binary diagnostic tests
    Bai, Tianyu
    Huang, Lan
    Li, Meijuan
    Tiwari, Ram
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2019, 29 (05) : 760 - 775
  • [36] Benefit-risk assessment of rofecoxib in the treatment of osteoarthritis
    Schmidt, H
    Woodcock, BG
    Geisslinger, G
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2004, 27 (03) : 185 - 196
  • [37] Benefit-Risk Assessment of Rofecoxib in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis
    Helmut Schmidt
    Barry G. Woodcock
    Gerd Geisslinger
    [J]. Drug Safety, 2004, 27 : 185 - 196
  • [38] Bayesian Approach to Personalized Benefit-Risk Assessment
    Cui, Shiqi
    Zhao, Yueqin
    Tiwari, Ram C.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 8 (03): : 316 - 324
  • [39] Benefit-Risk Assessment of Sirolimus in Renal Transplantation
    Dirk R.J. Kuypers
    [J]. Drug Safety, 2005, 28 : 153 - 181
  • [40] Benefit-risk assessment of sirolimus in renal transplantation
    Kuypers, DRJ
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2005, 28 (02) : 153 - 181