Benefit-risk assessment: the use of clinical utility index

被引:31
|
作者
Ouellet, Daniele [1 ]
机构
[1] GlaxoSmithKline, Clin Pharmacol Modeling & Simulat, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
关键词
benefit-risk; decision analysis; exposure-response; multi-attribute decision; therapeutic index; utility function; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; DECISION-ANALYSIS; MODEL; OXYBUTYNIN; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1517/14740330903499265
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Importance of the field: Measurement of the tradeoff between efficacy and safety is rarely done in a quantitative fashion. The use of a clinical utility index (CUI) has been proposed as a tool to aid in this assessment. The methodology from multi-attribute decision analysis is in its early stage in drug development and can be used to understand the therapeutic index and the value relative to the competitive landscape. Areas covered in this review: Different examples and applications of the use of CUI are reviewed and key steps involved in the development described. These include: i) characterization of the exposure response of efficacy and safety end points; ii) definition of clinically meaningful parameters; iii) selection and weighting of important attributes and iv) sensitivity analysis and measurement of uncertainty. What the reader will gain: An understanding of the value and limitations of CUI in drug development. Take home message: The use of a CUI for quantitative assessment of benefit/risk is most useful when there are multiple attributes involved in a decision to better understand the relevance of each attribute and when differentiation from competitors is critical to the success of a compound. Although development of CUI may be time- and resource-consuming, it allows clear and transparent decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 300
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Use of a Clinical Utility Index to Compare Insomnia Compounds: A Quantitative Basis for Benefit-Risk Assessment
    Ouellet, D.
    Werth, J.
    Parekh, N.
    Feltner, D.
    McCarthy, B.
    Lalonde, R. L.
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 85 (03) : 277 - 282
  • [2] Implementing Benefit-Risk Assessment for the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
    Warner, Margaret R.
    Wolka, Anne M.
    Noel, Rebecca A.
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2016, 50 (03) : 342 - 346
  • [3] Benefit-Risk Assessment Based on Ordered Clinical Outcomes
    Caster, Ola
    Noren, G. Niklas
    Ekenberg, Love
    Edwards, I. Ralph
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 19 : S8 - S8
  • [4] Implementing Benefit-Risk Assessment for the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
    Margaret R. Warner
    Anne M. Wolka
    Rebecca A. Noel
    [J]. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2016, 50 : 342 - 346
  • [5] Benefit-risk assessment of vaccines
    Kochhar, Sonali
    Izurieta, Hector S.
    Chandler, Rebecca E.
    Hacker, Adam
    Chen, Robert T.
    Levitan, Bennett
    [J]. VACCINE, 2024, 42 (04) : 969 - 971
  • [6] Estimand in benefit-risk assessment
    Ren, Xinru
    Chen, X. Gregory
    Seifu, Yodit
    Wang, William
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2023, 33 (04) : 452 - 465
  • [7] BENEFIT-RISK ASSESSMENT TODAY
    HALL, RE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 1978, 55 (01) : 193 - 197
  • [8] A Benefit-Risk Assessment of the Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Elderly
    Masclee, Gwen M. C.
    Sturkenboom, Miriam C. J. M.
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    [J]. DRUGS & AGING, 2014, 31 (04) : 263 - 282
  • [9] Benefit-risk ratios in the assessment of the clinical evidence of a new therapy
    Willan, AR
    OBrien, BJ
    Cook, DJ
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1997, 18 (02): : 121 - 130
  • [10] Benefit-risk assessment of acne therapies
    Seukeran, DC
    Eady, EA
    Cunliffe, WJ
    [J]. LANCET, 1997, 349 (9060): : 1251 - 1252