Intra-peritoneal versus retropubic implantation of three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis: Patient-reported outcomes and complications

被引:2
|
作者
Natali, Alessandro [1 ]
Grisanti Caroassai, Simone [1 ]
Tasso, Giovanni [1 ]
Cito, Gianmartin [1 ]
Gemma, Luca [1 ]
Cocci, Andrea [1 ]
Sessa, Francesco [1 ]
Verrienti, Pierangelo [1 ]
Serni, Sergio [1 ]
Carini, Marco [1 ]
Delle Rose, Augusto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Careggi Hosp, Dept Urol, Largo Brambilla 3, I-50134 Florence, Italy
关键词
Implantation; reservoir; inflatable; penile; prosthesis;
D O I
10.1177/0391560320967876
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The role of reservoir position was investigated in this series of patients treated with three-pieces penile prosthesis implantation (PPI). The outcomes and the patients' reported quality of life after insertion of the balloon in the retropubic space, or the Retzius's space (SOR), were compared with the outcomes of patients who received an intraperitoneal implantation (IP). The study aimed to analyze how the anatomy of the SOR influenced the long-term results of PPI, especially in patients who have been previously exposed to pelvic surgery or radiotherapy. The SOR has usually been identified as ideal for concealing and protecting the reservoir; nevertheless, an increasing rate of patients that ask for a PPI do not conserve the typical favorable characteristic of the SOR. In these cases, the tissue alteration can cause a higher rate of undesired events and can impair the satisfaction from device use. In the recent literature, few articles focus on the topic of reservoir position and very poor information is available about the results of the IP insertion. Materials: Our cohort of patients was retrospectively inspected; the two different subgroups, according to the reservoir position (SOR or IP) were evaluated considering the pre-operative condition, the post-operative complication, the development of undesired events or uncomfortable sensations during the follow-up. The quality of life after PPI was observed as well, with a questionnaire specifically developed for patients treated with PPI. The surgical technique adopted for the intraperitoneal implantation was described. Results: The results of penile prosthesis functionality and patients' and partners' reported quality of life (QoL) showed similar results between the two groups but greater satisfaction in the relational domain of the questionnaires adopted was described in the IP subgroup. Conclusion: According to our observations, the IP reservoir insertion guarantees good functionality and lower rates of undesired events after PPI.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 331
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Severe Vascular Complication after Implantation of a Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis
    Deho', Federico
    Henry, Gerard D.
    Marone, Enrico M.
    Sacca', Antonino
    Chiesa, Roberto
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2008, 5 (12): : 2956 - 2959
  • [2] Mechanical reliability, surgical complications, and patient and partner satisfaction of the modern three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis
    Govier, FE
    Gibbons, RP
    Correa, RJ
    Pritchett, TR
    Kramer-Levien, D
    UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (02) : 282 - 286
  • [3] Suprapubic Lipectomy and Placement of a Three-piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis
    Loh-Doyle, Jeffrey C.
    Markarian, Emily
    Burg, Madeleine
    Boyd, Stuart
    UROLOGY, 2023, 181 : E204 - E204
  • [4] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF TWO-PIECE VERSUS THREE-PIECE INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS
    Kim, J.
    Greenberg, J.
    Dick, B.
    Soubra, A.
    Hellstrom, W.
    Raheem, O.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2021, 18 (03): : S82 - S82
  • [5] Three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis: Ectopic reservoir placement
    Martinez-Holguin, E.
    Lledo-Garcia, E.
    Gonzalez, J.
    Hernandez-Fernandez, C.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2020, 44 (05): : 367 - 376
  • [6] Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Preexisting Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis
    Segal, Robert L.
    Readal, Nathaniel
    Pieororazio, Philip M.
    Kutlu, Omer
    Schoenberg, Mark
    Bivalacqua, Trinity J.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2013, 10 (02): : 595 - 598
  • [7] Three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis: Our experience so far
    Yu, M. H.
    Li, S. K.
    Li, C. M.
    Fan, C. W.
    Tang, C. N.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 : 17 - 17
  • [8] Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients with a preexisting three-piece inflatable prosthesis
    Briganti, A.
    Doha, F.
    Briganti, A.
    Gallina, A.
    Salonia, A.
    Zanni, G.
    Capitanio, U.
    Strada, E.
    Petralia, G.
    Sacca, A.
    Rigatti, P.
    Montorsi, F.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2008, 5 : 121 - 122
  • [9] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in a Patient with a Preexisting Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis
    Choi, Kyung Hwa
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Jung, Won Sug
    Chung, Byung Ha
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (01) : 70 - 72
  • [10] THE FEASIBILITY OF THREE-PIECE INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT RADICAL PELVIC SURGERY
    Usta, M.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2015, 12 : 91 - 91