A multimedia campaign to improve back beliefs in patients with non-specific low back pain: a process evaluation

被引:15
|
作者
Suman, Arnela [1 ]
Schaafsma, Frederieke G. [1 ,2 ]
Bamarni, Jiman [3 ]
van Tulder, Maurits W. [4 ]
Anema, Johannes R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, POB 7057, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Collaborat AMC UMCG UWV VUmc, Res Ctr Insurance Med,Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, POB 7067, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Student Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Fac Earth & Life Sci, Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Hlth Sci, Fac Earth & Life Sci, Boelelaan 1085, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
关键词
Implementation; Guidelines as topic; Process Assessment (Health Care); Multimedia; eHealth; Low back pain; Attitude to Health; Patient Satisfaction; MEDIA CAMPAIGN; CARE; IMPLEMENTATION; NETHERLANDS; REHABILITATION; INTERVENTION; EHEALTH; DESIGN; NECK;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-017-1551-z
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent and costly disorders worldwide. To reduce its burden in the Netherlands, implementation of a multidisciplinary guideline for LBP was supported by a multifaceted eHealth campaign for patients with LBP. The current study aims 1) to evaluate whether the implementation strategy was performed as planned; 2) to assess the feasibility, barriers and facilitators of the patient based eHealth campaign; 3) to gain insight into the satisfaction and experiences of patients with various ethnic backgrounds with the implementation strategy and to make a comparison between them; and 4) to explore the association between exposure to and satisfaction with the implementation strategy. Methods: This process evaluation was performed using the Linnan and Steckler framework, and used a mixed methods approach for data collection and analysis. The relationship between satisfaction of patients and exposure to the strategy was statistically examined. Semi-structured interviews were analysed using qualitative data analysis methods. Results: Two hundred and fourteen patients participated in the quantitative, and 44 in the qualitative analysis. Most were female and had a high level of education. Many patients did not use the campaign at all or only once, and those that did rated it as reasonable. Patient satisfaction with the campaign increased significantly with an increase in its use. Qualitative analysis showed that four main themes played a role in campaign rating and use: satisfaction with intervention components, perceived benefits of the intervention, usage of the intervention, and satisfaction with the medium used. Conclusion: This process evaluation showed that the eHealth campaign was used only by a small proportion of patients with non-specific LBP. It seemed that the campaign was offered to the patients too late, that the lay-out of the campaign did not meet patient needs, and that healthcare providers rarely discussed the campaign with their patients, while involvement of those providers seemed to improve trustworthiness of the campaign and increase its usage. It is important to invest effort into healthcare providers to motivate patients to use eHealth intervention and to tailor strategies better to the needs of users.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multimedia campaign to improve back beliefs in patients with non-specific low back pain: a process evaluation
    Arnela Suman
    Frederieke G. Schaafsma
    Jiman Bamarni
    Maurits W. van Tulder
    Johannes R. Anema
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18
  • [2] Non-specific low back pain
    Balague, Federico
    Mannion, Anne F.
    Pellise, Ferran
    Cedraschi, Christine
    LANCET, 2012, 379 (9814): : 482 - 491
  • [3] Low back pain (non-specific)
    Krismer, M.
    van Tulder, M.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 21 (01): : 77 - 91
  • [4] Non-Specific Low Back Pain
    Chenot, Jean-Francois
    Greitemann, Bernhard
    Kladny, Bernd
    Petzke, Frank
    Pfingsten, Michael
    Schorr, Susanne Gabriele
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 114 (51-52): : 883 - +
  • [5] Non-specific low back pain
    van Dieen, J. H.
    Kuijer, P. P. F. M.
    Burdorf, A.
    Marras, W. S.
    Adams, M. A.
    LANCET, 2012, 379 (9829): : 1874 - 1874
  • [6] Non-specific low back pain
    Maher, Chris
    Underwood, Martin
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    LANCET, 2017, 389 (10070): : 736 - 747
  • [7] Back Schools for chronic non-specific low back pain
    Parreira, Patricia
    Heymans, Martijn W.
    van Tulder, Maurits W.
    Esmail, Rosmin
    Koes, Bart W.
    Poquet, Nolwenn
    Lin, Chung-Wei Christine
    Maher, Christopher G.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (08):
  • [8] Effectiveness and cost-utility of a multifaceted eHealth strategy to improve back pain beliefs of patients with non-specific low back pain: a cluster randomised trial
    Suman, Arnela
    Schaafsma, Frederieke G.
    van Dongen, Johanna M.
    Elders, Petra J. M.
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    van Tulder, Maurits W.
    Anema, Johannes R.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (12):
  • [9] Chronic non-specific low back pain
    Brauer, Sandra
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2007, 53 (01): : 67 - 67
  • [10] Antidepressants for non-specific low back pain
    Urquhart, D. M.
    Floving, J. L.
    Assendelft, W. W. J. J.
    Roland, M.
    van, Tulder M. W.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (01):