Prostate cancer: correlation of intravoxel incoherent motion MR parameters with Gleason score

被引:30
|
作者
Yang, Dal Mo [1 ]
Kim, Hyun Cheol [1 ]
Kim, Sang Won [1 ]
Jahng, Geon-Ho [1 ]
Won, Kyu Yeoun [2 ]
Lim, Sung Jig [2 ]
Oh, Jang-Hoon [3 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ Hosp Gangdong, Dept Radiol, 149 Sangil Dong, Seoul 134727, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ Hosp Gangdong, Dept Pathol, 149 Sangil Dong, Seoul 134727, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ, Coll Elect & Informat, Dept Biomed Engn, Yongin, South Korea
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Incoherent intravoxel motion MRI; Prostate; Prostate cancer; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS; HISTOLOGIC GRADE; WEIGHTED MRI; T; AGGRESSIVENESS; TUMOR; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinimag.2016.01.001
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the potential of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging to predict histological prognostic parameters by investigating whether IVIM parameters correlate with Gleason score. Materials and methods: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study, and informed consent was waived. A total of 41 patients with histologically proven prostate cancer who underwent prostate MRI using a 3 T MRI machine were included. For eight diffusion-weighted imaging b-values (0, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 800 s/mm(2)), a spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence was performed: D, f, D*, and ADC(fit) values were compared among three groups of patients with prostate cancer: Gleason score 6 (n = 9), 7 (n = 16), or 8 or higher (n=16). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for D, f, D*, and ADC(fit) to assess the ability of each parameter to distinguish cancers with low Gleason scores from cancers with intermediate or high Gleason scores. Results: Pearson's coefficient analysis revealed significant negative correlations between Gleason score and ADC(fit) (r=-0.490, P=.001) and Gleason score and D values (r=-0.514, P=.001). Gleason score was poorly correlated with f (r=0.168, P=.292) and D* values (r=-0.108, P=.500). The ADC(fit) and D values of prostate cancers with Gleason scores 7 or >= 8 were significantly lower than values for prostate cancers with Gleason score 6 (P<.05). ROC curves were constructed to assess the ability of IVIM parameters to discriminate prostate cancers with Gleason score 6 from cancers with Gleason scores 7 or >= 8. Areas under the curve were 0.671 to 0.974. ADC(fit) and D yielded the highest Az value (0.960-0.956), whereas f yielded the lowest Az value (0.633). Conclusions: The pure molecular diffusion parameter, D, was the IVIM parameter that best discriminated prostate cancers with low Gleason scores from prostate cancers with intermediate or high Gleason scores. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 450
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Correlation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Parameters and Histological Characteristics From Infiltrated Marrow in Patients With Acute Leukemia
    Li, Jianting
    Zheng, Rong
    Niu, Jinliang
    Song, Xiaoli
    Wu, Wenqi
    Fan, Rong
    Gong, Tong
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 51 (06) : 1720 - 1726
  • [42] Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology
    Yingchan Shan
    Xiaoshan Chen
    Kai Liu
    Mengsu Zeng
    Jianjun Zhou
    Abdominal Radiology, 2019, 44 : 3441 - 3452
  • [43] Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology
    Shan, Yingchan
    Chen, Xiaoshan
    Liu, Kai
    Zeng, Mengsu
    Zhou, Jianjun
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (10) : 3441 - 3452
  • [44] Predicting Early Response to Chemoradiotherapy for Uterine Cervical Cancer Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging
    Kato, Hiroki
    Esaki, Kae
    Yamaguchi, Takahiro
    Tanaka, Hidekazu
    Kajita, Kimihiro
    Furui, Tatsuro
    Morishige, Ken-ichirou
    Goshima, Satoshi
    Matsuo, Masayuki
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 18 (04) : 293 - 298
  • [45] B-Value Optimization in the Estimation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Parameters in Patients with Cervical Cancer
    Perucho, Jose Angelo Udal
    Chang, Hing Chiu Charles
    Vardhanabhuti, Varut
    Wang, Mandi
    Becker, Anton Sebastian
    Wurnig, Moritz Christoph
    Lee, Elaine Yuen Phin
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 21 (02) : 218 - 227
  • [46] Comparison of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Parameters across MR Imagers and Field Strengths: Evaluation in Upper Abdominal Organs
    Barbieri, Sebastiano
    Donati, Olivio F.
    Froehlich, Johannes M.
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 279 (03) : 784 - 794
  • [47] Liver Cirrhosis: Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR Imaging-Pilot Study
    Luciani, Alain
    Vignaud, Alexandre
    Cavet, Madeleine
    Van Nhieu, Jeanne Tran
    Mallat, Ariane
    Ruel, Lucile
    Laurent, Alexis
    Deux, Jean-Francois
    Brugieres, Pierre
    Rahmouni, Alain
    RADIOLOGY, 2008, 249 (03) : 891 - 899
  • [48] Noninvasive assessment of endometrial fibrosis in patients with intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging
    Hu, Qing
    Jiang, Peipei
    Feng, Yongjing
    Xu, Yan
    Zhou, Nan
    Chen, Weibo
    Zhu, Li
    Hu, Yali
    Zhou, Zhengyang
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [49] Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Analysis of Cervical Cancer tumours on 1.5T MR-Linac
    Ingle, Manasi
    Blackledge, Matthew
    Wetscherek, Andreas
    Alexander, Sophie
    Nartey, Jayde
    McNair, Helen
    Hafeez, Shaista
    Bhide, Shreerang
    Lalondrelle, Susan
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S4988 - S4990
  • [50] Study on diagnostic value of quantitative parameters of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) in prostate cancer
    Yao, Weigen
    Liu, Jie
    Zheng, Jiaju
    Lu, Pengcong
    Zou, Shufang
    Xu, Ying
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (04): : 3696 - 3702