DEVELOPMENT OF MULTISITE STREAMFLOW GENERATION MODELS

被引:0
|
作者
Arslan, Chelang A. [1 ]
Buyukyildiz, Meral [2 ]
机构
[1] Kirkuk Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Engn Coll, Kirkuk, Iraq
[2] Selcuk Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Konya, Turkey
来源
FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN | 2016年 / 25卷 / 05期
关键词
Artificial neural network; Matalas; multisite; streamflow; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; RIVER FLOW PREDICTION; WATER-QUALITY; PRECIPITATION; CALIBRATION; SIMULATION; HYDROLOGY; MATRICES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Forecasting of streamflow can have a significant economic impact, as this can help in water management and can be helpful tool to provide protection from water shortages and possible flood damage. In recent work the artificial neural networks different models with different training algorithms were examined to simulate Tigris River using the cross correlation between the flow of different sites or gauge stations. The challenging task in this work was to improve the forecasting models to generate a future series by ANNs models by using input parameters from nearby sites. Therefore the best conventional method to compare and judge the results was selected to be the 1st order autoregressive moving average Matalas which deals with multi variables as input parameters and generate future series for these variables at the same time. The traditional architecture of ANNs models were also a good comparison tools to decide the new multisite ANN models success. It was concluded from this study that consisting nearby sites monthly flow series as input parameters in ANN architecture after investigating the cross correlation between the series's may led to more successful forecasting models. This can also provide a good promise to predict ungauged flow values in some sites which are suffering from missed data by using the flow values from nearby stations.
引用
收藏
页码:1502 / 1512
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison between Deseasonalized Models for Monthly Streamflow Generation in a Hurst-Kolmogorov Process Framework
    Marco Detzel, Daniel Henrique
    Moro Mine, Miriam Rita
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2017, 22 (04)
  • [32] Stochastic Generation of Streamflow Time Series
    Oliveira, Bruno
    Maia, Rodrigo
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2018, 23 (10)
  • [33] Biomimetic Sealing System for Streamflow Generation
    Nakanishi, Yoshitaka
    Shimazu, Kenryo
    Oka, Yuichi
    Mine, Syoji
    Matsumoto, Yasuaki
    Higaki, Hidehiko
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS (ICRERA), 2013, : 211 - 214
  • [34] STREAMFLOW GENERATION PROCESSES - AN AUSTRAL VIEW
    PEARCE, AJ
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1990, 26 (12) : 3037 - 3047
  • [35] Ferromagnetic Potts models with multisite interaction
    Schreiber, Nir
    Cohen, Reuven
    Haber, Simi
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2018, 97 (03)
  • [36] Development of streamflow prediction models for a weir using ANN and step-wise regression
    Hassan M.
    Zaffar H.
    Mehmood I.
    Khitab A.
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2018, 4 (3) : 1021 - 1028
  • [37] ESTIMATING CORRELATIONS IN MULTIVARIATE STREAMFLOW MODELS
    STEDINGER, JR
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1981, 17 (01) : 200 - 208
  • [38] STOCHASTIC STREAMFLOW MODELS FOR HYDROELECTRIC SYSTEMS
    PEREIRA, MVF
    OLIVEIRA, GC
    COSTA, CCG
    KELMAN, J
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1984, 20 (03) : 379 - 390
  • [39] IDENTIFICATION OF STREAMFLOW STOCHASTIC-MODELS
    SALAS, JD
    OBEYSEKERA, JTB
    SMITH, RA
    JOURNAL OF THE HYDRAULICS DIVISION-ASCE, 1981, 107 (07): : 853 - 866
  • [40] SELECTING MODELS FOR SYNTHETIC MONTHLY STREAMFLOW
    JETTMAR, RU
    YOUNG, GK
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1974, 55 (04): : 243 - 243