DEVELOPMENT OF MULTISITE STREAMFLOW GENERATION MODELS

被引:0
|
作者
Arslan, Chelang A. [1 ]
Buyukyildiz, Meral [2 ]
机构
[1] Kirkuk Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Engn Coll, Kirkuk, Iraq
[2] Selcuk Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Konya, Turkey
来源
FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN | 2016年 / 25卷 / 05期
关键词
Artificial neural network; Matalas; multisite; streamflow; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; RIVER FLOW PREDICTION; WATER-QUALITY; PRECIPITATION; CALIBRATION; SIMULATION; HYDROLOGY; MATRICES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Forecasting of streamflow can have a significant economic impact, as this can help in water management and can be helpful tool to provide protection from water shortages and possible flood damage. In recent work the artificial neural networks different models with different training algorithms were examined to simulate Tigris River using the cross correlation between the flow of different sites or gauge stations. The challenging task in this work was to improve the forecasting models to generate a future series by ANNs models by using input parameters from nearby sites. Therefore the best conventional method to compare and judge the results was selected to be the 1st order autoregressive moving average Matalas which deals with multi variables as input parameters and generate future series for these variables at the same time. The traditional architecture of ANNs models were also a good comparison tools to decide the new multisite ANN models success. It was concluded from this study that consisting nearby sites monthly flow series as input parameters in ANN architecture after investigating the cross correlation between the series's may led to more successful forecasting models. This can also provide a good promise to predict ungauged flow values in some sites which are suffering from missed data by using the flow values from nearby stations.
引用
收藏
页码:1502 / 1512
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MULTISITE ARMA(1,1) AND DISAGGREGATION MODELS FOR ANNUAL STREAMFLOW GENERATION
    STEDINGER, JR
    LETTENMAIER, DP
    VOGEL, RM
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1985, 21 (04) : 497 - 509
  • [2] A GLM copula approach for multisite annual streamflow generation
    Porto, Victor Costa
    de Souza Filho, Francisco de Assis
    Carvalho, Tais Maria Nunes
    de Carvalho Studart, Ticiana Marinho
    Portela, Maria Manuela
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 598
  • [3] Performance of multisite streamflow stochastic generation approaches for a multi-reservoir system
    Ma, Yufei
    Zhong, Ping-an
    Wang, Guoqing
    Xiao, Yao
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2024, 38 (05) : 2007 - 2018
  • [4] Comparative study on multisite streamflow generation model HEC-4 and ANN model
    Jothiprakash, V.
    Devamane, M.G.
    Mohan, S.
    Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Civil Engineering Division, 2006, 87 (MAY): : 9 - 14
  • [5] Multisite disaggregation of monthly to daily streamflow
    Kumar, DN
    Lall, U
    Petersen, MR
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2000, 36 (07) : 1823 - 1833
  • [6] SHOT NOISE MODELS FOR GENERATION OF SYNTHETIC STREAMFLOW DATA
    WEISS, G
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1977, 13 (01) : 101 - 108
  • [7] Multisite Daily Streamflow Simulation With Time Irreversibility
    Mathai, Jeenu
    Mujumdar, P. P.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2019, 55 (11) : 9334 - 9350
  • [8] A multisite seasonal ensemble streamflow forecasting technique
    Bracken, Cameron
    Rajagopalan, Balaji
    Prairie, James
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46
  • [9] Multisite, multivariate weather generation based on generalised linear models
    Chandler, Richard E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2020, 134 (134)
  • [10] A REVIEW OF SINGLE-SITE MODELS FOR MONTHLY STREAMFLOW GENERATION
    PHIEN, HN
    RUKSASILP, W
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1981, 52 (1-2) : 1 - 12