Should mitigating comorbidities be considered in assessing healthcare plan performance in achieving optimal glycemic control?

被引:0
|
作者
Pogach, Leonard M.
Tiwari, Anjali
Maney, Miriam
Rajan, Mangala
Miller, Donald R.
Aron, David
机构
[1] Dept Vet Affairs, New Jersey Healthcare Syst, Hlth Serv Res & Dev Ctr Healthcare Knowledge Mana, E Orange, NJ 07018 USA
[2] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Dent Sch, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[3] Louis Stokes Cleveland Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[6] Bedford Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Qual Outcomes & Econ Res, Bedford, MA USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE | 2007年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Whether a public reporting measure for glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) of less than 7% should apply to all persons with diabetes mellitus is a matter of ongoing controversy. Objective: To evaluate the effect of excluding persons with major medical or mental health conditions on assessment of healthcare system performance in achieving an A1C level of less than 7%. Design and Setting: Retrospective longitudinal administrative data analysis from 144 Veterans Health Administration medical centers. Subjects: Veterans with diabetes mellitus younger than 65 years who were users of Veterans Health Administration healthcare in fiscal years 1999 and 2000. Major Outcome Variables: The proportions, 5-year mortality, and glycemic control of individuals with and without major comorbid conditions, as well as changes in league table rankings of facilities achieving an A1C threshold of less than 7% with and without the inclusion of seriously ill individuals. Results: There were 220 922 subjects identified from 144 facilities. We identified 75 296 individuals (mean +/- SD facility range of excluded individuals, 33.3% +/- 5.3%) with conditions that would decrease the benefits or increase risks of glycemic control. The 5-year unadjusted mortality was 36.0% in 48 001 subjects (21.7%) excluded for major medical or neurological conditions, 14.9% in 17 515 subjects (7.9%) excluded for major mental health conditions, and 16.5% in 9780 subjects (4.4%) excluded for 2 or more other serious comorbid medical or psychological conditions, compared with 8.8% in the remaining subjects. A comparison of industry league table rankings indicated that 20% of the best and worse facilities changed 1 decile when ranking using exclusion criteria. Conclusion: One in 3 veterans has comorbid conditions that would increase the risks or decrease the benefits of intensive glycemic control. We propose that a public reporting measure for A1C of less than 7% be subjected to exclusion criteria rather than be applied to all persons with diabetes mellitus.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 140
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Scans per day as predictors of optimal glycemic control in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus using flash glucose monitoring: what number of scans per day should raise a red flag?
    Sebastian-Valles, Fernando
    Martinez-Alfonso, Julia
    Martin, Jose Alfonso Arranz
    Jimenez-Diaz, Jessica
    Alday, Inigo Hernando
    Navas-Moreno, Victor
    Joya, Teresa Armenta
    Garcia, Maria del Mar Fandino
    Gomez, Gisela Liz Roman
    Lobarinas, Luis Eduardo Lander
    de Icaya, Purificacion Martinez
    Sampedro-Nunez, Miguel Antonio
    Martinez-Vizacaino, Vicente
    Marazuela, Monica
    [J]. ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2024, 61 (03) : 343 - 350
  • [22] Scans per day as predictors of optimal glycemic control in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus using flash glucose monitoring: what number of scans per day should raise a red flag?
    Fernando Sebastian-Valles
    Julia Martínez-Alfonso
    Jose Alfonso Arranz Martin
    Jessica Jiménez-Díaz
    Iñigo Hernando Alday
    Victor Navas-Moreno
    Teresa Armenta Joya
    Maria del Mar Fandiño García
    Gisela Liz Román Gómez
    Luis Eduardo Lander Lobariñas
    Purificación Martinez de Icaya
    Miguel Antonio Sampedro-Nuñez
    Vicente Martínez-Vizacaíno
    Mónica Marazuela
    [J]. Acta Diabetologica, 2024, 61 : 343 - 350
  • [23] Biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 three times a day in older patients with type 2 diabetes not achieving optimal glycemic control on a twice-daily regimen: A retrospective case series analysis from clinical practice
    Joseph T. Tibaldi
    [J]. Advances in Therapy, 2007, 24 : 1348 - 1356
  • [24] Biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 three times a day in older patients with type 2 diabetes not achieving optimal glycemic control on a twice-daily regimen: A retrospective case series analysis from clinical practice
    Tibaldi, Joseph T.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2007, 24 (06) : 1348 - 1356