Impact of Hydropower on Air Pollution and Economic Growth in China

被引:5
|
作者
Li, Chenggang [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Tao [1 ]
Xu, Zhenci [3 ]
机构
[1] Guizhou Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Big Data Applicat & Econ, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[2] Guizhou Univ Finance & Econ, Green Dev Strategy Res Inst Batch New Characteris, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Geog, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China
关键词
hydropower; haze pollution; economic growth; spatial Durbin model; geographically weighted regression; RENEWABLE ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; POPULATION;
D O I
10.3390/en14102812
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The development of renewable clean energy such as hydropower can not only ensure energy security, but also help achieve the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals. This paper uses the annual data of 30 provinces in China from 2000 to 2017, and constructs a dynamic spatial Durbin model and a geographically weighted regression model to empirically test the dynamic impact of hydropower on haze pollution and economic growth at the national and provincial levels. The empirical results show that the promoting effect of hydropower on economic growth in Western China is less than that in Eastern China, which further aggravates the economic development gap between the eastern and western regions. In addition, the suppression effect of hydropower on the haze pollution in the western region is greater than that in the eastern region, where the haze pollution is serious. From the national level, hydropower can promote regional economic growth and inhibit haze pollution, and the spatial spillover effects of these two effects are greater than the local effects, and the long-term impact is greater than the short-term impact. The research conclusions of this paper will help China realize the sustainable development goals of energy saving and emission reduction.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Relationship between Economic Growth and Air Pollution-A Regional Comparison between China and South Korea
    Jiang, Min
    Kim, Euijune
    Woo, Youngjin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (08)
  • [42] Foreign Direct Investment's Impact on China's Economic Growth, Technological Innovation and Pollution
    Zeng, Shihong
    Zhou, Ya
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (06) : 1 - 25
  • [43] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF METHODS TO ASSESS THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF AIR POLLUTION
    Conti, S.
    Fornari, C.
    Madotto, F.
    Cesana, G.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A549 - A549
  • [44] Recessions and Health: The Impact of Economic Trends on Air Pollution in California
    Davis, Mary E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 102 (10) : 1951 - 1956
  • [45] Economic growth, international trade and air pollution: A decomposition analysis
    Kukla-Gryz, Anna
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (05) : 1329 - 1339
  • [46] IMPACT OF AIR-POLLUTION ON GROWTH OF PONDEROSA PINE
    MCBRIDE, JR
    SEMION, VP
    MILLER, PR
    [J]. CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE, 1975, 29 (12) : 8 - 9
  • [47] The impact of periodic air pollution peaks in Beijing on air quality governance in China
    Schwabe, Julian
    Hassler, Markus
    [J]. ERDE, 2016, 147 (01): : 53 - 65
  • [48] Air pollution and associated health impact and economic loss embodied in inter-provincial electricity transfer in China
    Wang, Jiaxin
    Zhou, Sheng
    Huang, Tao
    Ling, Zaili
    Liu, Yao
    Song, Shijie
    Ren, Ji
    Zhang, Menglin
    Yang, Zhaoli
    Wei, Zijian
    Zhao, Yuan
    Gao, Hong
    Ma, Jianmin
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 883
  • [49] Economic evaluation of health losses from air pollution in Beijing, China
    Xiaoli Zhao
    Xueying Yu
    Ying Wang
    Chunyang Fan
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23 : 11716 - 11728
  • [50] The impact of air pollution on venture capital: evidence from China
    Tian Gan
    Yumin Li
    Yan Jiang
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 90615 - 90631