A novel combined cycle with synthetic utilization of coal and natural gas

被引:18
|
作者
Han, Wei [1 ]
Jin, Hongguang [1 ]
Xu, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Engn Thermophys, Beijing 100080, Peoples R China
关键词
methane/steam reforming; dual fuel; combined cycle; exergy; energy level;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2006.10.012
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, a novel combined cycle with synthetic utilization of coal and natural gas is proposed, in which the burning of coal provides thermal energy to the methane/steam reforming reaction. The syngas fuel, generated by the reforming reaction, is directly provided to the gas turbine as fuel. The reforming process with coal firing has been investigated based on the concept of energy level, and the equations has been derived to disclosing the mechanism of the cascade utilization of chemical energy of natural gas and coal in the reforming process with coal firing. Through the synthetic utilization of natural gas and coal, the exergy destruction of the combustion of syngas is decreased obviously compared with the direct combustion of natural gas and coal. As a result, the overall thermal efficiency of the new cycle reaches 52.9%, as energy supply by methane is about twice as much as these of coal. With the same consumption of natural gas and coal the new cycle can generate about 6% more power than the reference cycles (the combined cycle and the steam power plant). The promising results obtained here provide a new way to utilize natural gas and coal more efficiently and economically by synthetic utilization. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1334 / 1342
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Coal Gas Dehydration Equipment in Combined Cycle Power Plant
    Xiao Lichun
    Ding Zhijiang
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-4, 2012, 220-223 : 554 - +
  • [22] Coal units convert to gas-fired combined cycle
    不详
    [J]. POWER ENGINEERING, 1996, 100 (05) : 50 - 50
  • [23] Utilization of LSSVM algorithm for estimating synthetic natural gas density
    Razavi, Razieh
    Kardani, Mohammad Navid
    Ghanbari, Alireza
    Lariche, Milad Janghorban
    Baghban, Alireza
    [J]. PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 36 (11) : 807 - 812
  • [24] Economical utilization of natural gas to produce synthetic petroleum liquids
    Agee, KL
    Agee, MA
    Willingham, FY
    Trepper, EL
    [J]. GAS PROCESSORS ASSOCIATION - SEVENTY-FIFTH ANNUAL CONVENTION, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 134 - 139
  • [25] Novel combined cycle configurations for propane pre-cooled mixed refrigerant (APCI) natural gas liquefaction cycle
    Mortazavi, Amir
    Alabdulkarem, Abdullah
    Hwang, Yunho
    Radermacher, Reinhard
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 117 : 76 - 86
  • [26] Design and Economic Evaluation of Coal to Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) Process
    Yu, Bor-Yih
    Chien, I-Lung
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PROCESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (PSE) AND 25TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING (ESCAPE), PT B, 2015, 37 : 1109 - 1114
  • [27] Design and Economic Evaluation of a Coal-to-Synthetic Natural Gas Process
    Yu, Bor-Yih
    Chien, I-Lung
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2015, 54 (08) : 2339 - 2352
  • [28] Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Production from Natural Gas Combined Cycle
    Banar, Mufide
    Cokaygil, Zerrin
    [J]. PRES 2010: 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION, 2010, 21 : 157 - 162
  • [29] Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Shale Gas, Natural Gas, Coal, and Petroleum
    Burnham, Andrew
    Han, Jeongwoo
    Clark, Corrie E.
    Wang, Michael
    Dunn, Jennifer B.
    Palou-Rivera, Ignasi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (02) : 619 - 627
  • [30] Synthetic natural gas as an alternative to coal for power generation in China: Life cycle analysis of haze pollution, greenhouse gas emission, and resource consumption
    Man, Yi
    Han, Yulin
    Hu, Yusha
    Yang, Sheng
    Yang, Siyu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 2503 - 2512