Experimental study of masonry infill reinforced concrete frames with and without corner openings

被引:19
|
作者
Khoshnoud, Hamid Reza [1 ]
Marsono, Kadir [2 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Langroud Branch, Dept Civil Engn, Langroud, Iran
[2] Univ Technol Malaysia, Fac Civil Engn, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia
关键词
masonry infill wall; corner opening; reinforcement concrete frames; monotonic lateral load; experimental methods; earthquake engineering; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.12989/sem.2016.57.4.641
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Reinforced concrete frame buildings with masonry infill walls are one of the most popular structural systems in the world. In most cases, the effects of masonry infill walls are not considered in structural models. The results of earthquakes show that infill walls have a significant effect on the seismic response of buildings. In some cases, the buildings collapsed as a result of the formation of a soft story. This study developed a simple method, called corner opening, by replacing the corner of infill walls with a very flexible material to enhance the structural behavior of walls. To evaluate the proposed method a series of experiments were conducted on masonry infill wall and reinforced concrete frames with and without corner openings. Two 1: 4 scale masonry infill walls with and without corner openings were tested under diagonal tension or shear strength and two RC frames with full infill walls and with corner opening infill walls were tested under monotonic horizontal loading up to a drift level of 2.5%. The experimental results revealed that the proposed method reduced the strength of infill wall specimens but considerably enhanced the ductility of infill wall specimens in the diagonal tension test. Moreover, the corner opening in infill walls prevented the slid shear failure of the infill wall in RC frames with infill walls.
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 656
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Shake-table study on the effect of masonry infill on the seismic response of reinforced concrete frames
    Baloevic, Goran
    Radnic, Jure
    Grgic, Nikola
    Grubisic, Ivan
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 161
  • [22] Effect of openings on the behaviour of fibre reinforced concrete and masonry infilled RC frames
    Ganesan, N.
    Irshad, P.
    Indira, P.V.
    Indian Concrete Journal, 2019, 98 (01): : 8 - 15
  • [23] Effect of openings on the behaviour of fibre reinforced concrete and masonry infilled RC frames
    Ganesan, N.
    Irshad, P.
    Indira, P.V.
    Indian Concrete Journal, 2019, 93 (01): : 8 - 15
  • [24] Influence of masonry panels with openings on the seismic response of reinforced concrete infilled frames
    Noui, S.
    Kadid, A.
    Bali, A.
    SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2019, 26 (01) : 157 - 166
  • [25] Effect of concrete masonry infill walls on progressive collapse performance of reinforced concrete infilled frames
    Yu, Jun
    Gan, Yi-Ping
    Wu, Jun
    Wu, Hao
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 191 : 179 - 193
  • [26] Different FEM models of reinforced concrete frames stiffened by infill masonry for lateral loads
    Haris, Istvan
    Hortobagyi, Zsolt
    PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2012, 56 (01): : 25 - 34
  • [27] Innovative decoupling system for the seismic protection of masonry infill walls in reinforced concrete frames
    Marinkovic, Marko
    Butenweg, Christoph
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 197
  • [28] Cyclic testing of a single bay reinforced concrete frames with various types of masonry infill
    Zovkic, Jurko
    Sigmund, Vladimir
    Guljas, Ivica
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2013, 42 (08): : 1131 - 1149
  • [29] The effect of masonry infill walls on the reinforced concrete frames behavior under lateral load
    Layadi, Ismail
    Messabhia, Ali
    Plassiard, Jean-Patrick
    Ple, Olivier
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS AND ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 7 (01): : 125 - 140
  • [30] Experimental study on separating reinforced concrete infill walls from steel moment frames
    Ju, Ruey-Shyang
    Lee, Hung-Jen
    Chen, Cheng-Cheng
    Tao, Chi-Chun
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2012, 71 : 119 - 128