Colorectal Surgery Resident Participation in Screening Colonoscopies: How Does It Impact Quality?

被引:2
|
作者
Sapci, Ipek [1 ]
Aiello, Alexandra [1 ]
Hassab, Tarek H. [1 ]
Gorgun, Emre [1 ]
Hull, Tracy L. [1 ]
Champagne, Bradley J. [1 ]
Steele, Scott R. [1 ]
Valente, Michael A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Colorectal Surg, Digest Dis & Surg Inst, 9500 Euclid Ave,Desk A-30, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
Adenoma detection rate; Colonoscopy quality; Colorectal surgery resident; Screening colonoscopy; ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; TRAINEE PARTICIPATION; COMPETENCE; POLYP;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000001503
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Performing colonoscopies is an integral component of colorectal surgery residency training. There exists a paucity of literature regarding colonoscopy quality metrics with colorectal trainee involvement. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of colorectal surgery resident participation on quality metrics in screening colonoscopy. DESIGN: Screening colonoscopies performed between August 1, 2016, and July 31, 2018, were queried from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Data were cross-checked with resident case logs to verify colonoscopies with resident participation. SETTING: This study was conducted by the colorectal surgery department at a tertiary level hospital in the United States. PATIENTS Consecutive, asymptomatic patients aged >= 45 years, undergoing screening colonoscopy, were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The quality parameters measured included overall, male, and female adenoma detection rates; total examination time; withdrawal time; cecal intubation rate; quality of bowel preparation; complications; and medication dosage. RESULTS: A total of 4594 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 60.5 +/- 8.4 years (range, 45-91); 51.7% were women. Overall, 4186 of the colonoscopies were performed without resident participation, and 408 were performed with resident participation. Scope insertion, withdrawal, and total examination times were longer in the resident group. Cecal intubation rate, polypectomy rate, sex-specific and overall adenoma detection rates, and complication rates were similar between the groups. In the multivariate model, trainee involvement had no significant impact on adenoma detection rate. In addition, the trainee group utilized a higher mean dose of fentanyl. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective nature of the data with possible coding errors of the database and the inability to quantify the amount of resident participation and to clarify the degree of attending surgeon assistance and oversight were limitations of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal surgery resident participation in screening colonoscopy takes longer and appears safe, while achieving all national quality metrics without compromising adenoma detection rates. Changes in colonoscopy scheduling in regard to length of time may prove beneficial when there is resident participation. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B43.
引用
收藏
页码:1528 / 1532
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic in Colonoscopies and Colorectal, Rectosigmoid and Anal Cancer Screening
    de Andrade, Rafaela
    Lech, Gabriele Eckerdt
    Paludo Menna Barreto, Pedro Antonio
    Alberti, Arthur Minas
    de Sa Beltramo, Luiza Seixas
    Azambuja, Fernando
    Tibola Marques da Silva, Laura
    Kieling, Lucas
    Silveira, Pedro Arthur Zimmer
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2023, 32 (06)
  • [22] Screening for colorectal cancer: Does practice setting influence resident behavior?
    Oppenheim, YL
    Oh, JH
    Eichorn, AM
    Jotkowitz, AB
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 15 : 41 - 42
  • [23] Colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening - is it effective in the hands of a general surgery resident?
    Matyja, Maciej
    Pasternak, Artur
    Wysocki, Michal
    Pedziwiatr, Michal
    Szura, Miroslaw
    Rembiasz, Kazimierz
    POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 90 (05) : 6 - 12
  • [24] Screening for colorectal cancer in France: How to improve adhesion and participation?
    Saurin, Jean-Christophe
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2017, 49 (03) : 312 - 313
  • [25] Impact of Additional Colonoscopies in a Population Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Program. Improvement Strategies
    Carot, Laura
    Raga, Agnes
    Hernandez, Cristina
    Buron, Andrea
    Comas, Merce
    Macia, Francesc
    Alvarez-Urturi, Cristina
    Andreu, Montserrat
    Bessa, Xavier
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S751 - S751
  • [26] Does Resident Participation Influence Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Morbidity and Mortality?
    Abt, Nicholas B.
    Reh, Douglas D.
    Eisele, David W.
    Francis, Howard W.
    Gourin, Christine G.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2016, 126 (10): : 2263 - 2269
  • [27] Second-Look Colonoscopies and the Impact on Capacity in FIT-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Grobbee, Esmee J.
    Kapidzic, Atija
    van Vuuren, Anneke J.
    van Leerdam, Monique
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Looman, Caspar W. N.
    Bruno, Marco J.
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    Spaander, Manon C. W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 (07): : 1072 - 1077
  • [28] Quality of life after surgery in individuals with familial colorectal cancer: does extended surgery have an adverse impact?
    Pollett, William G.
    Marion, Kaye
    Moeslein, Gabriela
    Schneider, Claudia
    Parry, Susan
    Veysey, Katrina
    Bissett, Ian P.
    Jones, Ian
    Macrae, Finlay
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 84 (05) : 359 - 364
  • [29] DOES RESIDENT INVOLVEMENT DURING LAPAROSCOPIC COLORECTAL SURGERY IMPACT PATIENT OUTCOMES? RESULTS FROM THE ACS-NSQIP.
    Advani, V.
    Markwell, S.
    Rakinic, J.
    Hassan, I.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (05) : E187 - E188
  • [30] How does genome sequencing impact surgery?
    Marlies S. Reimers
    Charla C. Engels
    Peter J. K. Kuppen
    Cornelis J. H. van de Velde
    Gerrit J. Liefers
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2014, 11 : 610 - 618