Selecting Appropriate Project Delivery System: Fuzzy Approach with Risk Analysis

被引:62
|
作者
Mostafavi, Ali [3 ,4 ]
Karamouz, Mohammad [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Polytech Inst, Brooklyn, NY USA
[2] Univ Tehran, Sch Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
[3] Purdue Univ, Sch Civil Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Univ Tehran, Dept Civil Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Project delivery systems; Fuzzy multiattribute decision making; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Risk attitude; Risk analysis;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000190
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The selection of an appropriate project delivery system that suits all project and owner needs is one of the key decisions to a successful project. Therefore, this decision should be made based on thorough analysis. In this paper, a fuzzy multiattribute decision-making (FMADM) model is developed. The model accounts for uncertainties and imprecision in the decision space as well as fuzziness in the nature of the decision attributes. The model utilizes fuzzy decision-making approach in order to evaluate the membership function corresponding to the utility of each project delivery alternative. Project delivery system alternatives are ranked using fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method based on their utility membership functions and by evaluating the distance of each project delivery alternative from fuzzy ideal solutions. In the TOPSIS method, alternatives are ranked based on their closeness coefficient (CC). In addition, the risk attitude of the decision maker is considered in the model by using derived utility membership functions corresponding to the risk attitude of the decision maker. The model is applied to a petrochemical project as a case study. In the case study, the model outcome that ranked Turnkey system as the best system conforms to the lessons learned by the decision maker from several past projects. Moreover, sensitivity analysis is done in the case study. The results show the significant value of the FMADM model for selecting appropriate project delivery system for projects.
引用
收藏
页码:923 / 930
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Efficient Approach for Fuzzy Project Network Analysis
    HU Jing-song Department of Management Science & Engineering
    Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2002, (01) : 83 - 89
  • [32] An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making approach for project delivery system selection
    Khanzadi, M.
    Nasirzadeh, F.
    Hassani, S. M. Hossein
    Mohtashemi, N. Nejad
    SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2016, 23 (03) : 802 - 814
  • [33] Risk analysis in ultra deep scientific drilling project - A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach
    Liu, Jia Lin
    Li, Quanxi
    Wang, Yuhan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2013, 31 (03) : 449 - 458
  • [34] A new fuzzy decision-making approach for selecting new product development project
    Wei, Chiu-Chi
    Andria, Agus
    Xiao, Houn-Wen
    Wei, Chiou-Shuei
    Lai, Ting-Chang
    CONCURRENT ENGINEERING-RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2016, 24 (03): : 240 - 250
  • [35] A Novel Hybrid MCDM Approach Based on Fuzzy DEMATEL, ANP, and Fuzzy VIKOR for Selecting the Best Project Managers
    Khodadadi, Ekhtiar
    Aghabeigi, Mehdi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2018, 9 (02) : 38 - 64
  • [36] A Hybrid Fuzzy System Dynamics Approach for Risk Analysis of AUV Operations
    Loh, Tzu Yang
    Brito, Mario P.
    Bose, Neil
    Xu, Jingjing
    Nikolova, Natalia
    Tenekedjiev, Kiril
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATICS, 2020, 24 (01) : 26 - 39
  • [37] Fuzzy Risk Analysis of Harbour Engineering Investment by Hierarchy System Approach
    Lin Shaopei and Zhang Zhongming Professor
    China Ocean Engineering, 1992, (01) : 87 - 94
  • [38] Going digital: Selecting the appropriate camera system
    Wang, C
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT, 2003, 40 : 125 - 132
  • [39] SELECTING AN APPROPRIATE HYDROGEL LENS CARE SYSTEM
    JOSEPHSON, JE
    CAFFERY, BE
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION, 1981, 52 (03) : 227 - 234
  • [40] Selecting an appropriate watering system for your facility
    Novak, G
    LAB ANIMAL, 1999, 28 (04) : 43 - 46