Feather pecking genotype and phenotype affect behavioural responses of laying hens

被引:26
|
作者
van der Eijk, Jerine A. J. [1 ,2 ]
Lammers, Aart [2 ]
Li, Peiyun [1 ]
Kjaer, Joergen B. [3 ]
Rodenburg, T. Bas [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Behav Ecol Grp, POB 338, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Adaptat Physiol Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Friedrich Loeffler Inst, Inst Anim Welf & Anim Husb, Fed Res Inst Anim Hlth, Celle, Germany
[4] Univ Utrecht, Anim Sci & Soc, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Feather pecking; Phenotype; Genotype; Fearfulness; Activity; Coping style; OPEN-FIELD RESPONSE; TONIC IMMOBILITY; DOMESTIC-FOWL; FEAR; SELECTION; CHICKS; YOUNG; CANNIBALISM; REACTIVITY; PREDICTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2018.05.027
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Feather pecking (FP) is a major welfare and economic issue in the egg production industry. Behavioural characteristics, such as fearfulness, have been related to FP. However, it is unknown how divergent selection on FP affects fearfulness in comparison to no selection on FP. Therefore, we compared responses of birds selected on low (LFP) and high feather pecking (HFP) with birds from an unselected control line (CON) to several behavioural tests (i.e. novel object (NO), novel environment (NE), open field (OF) and tonic immobility (TI)) at young and adult ages. Furthermore, the relation between actual FP behaviour (i.e. FP phenotypes) and fearfulness is not well understood. Therefore, we compared responses of birds with differing FP phenotypes. Feather pecking phenotypes of individual birds were identified via FP observations at several ages. The number of severe feather pecks given and received was used to categorize birds as feather peckers, feather pecker-victims, victims or neutrals. Here we show that HFP birds repeatedly had more active responses (i.e. they approached a NO sooner, vocalized sooner and more, showed more flight attempts and had shorter TI durations), which could indicate lower fearfulness, compared to CON and LFP birds at both young and adult ages. Within the HFP line, feather peckers had more active responses (i.e. they tended to show more flight attempts compared to victims and tended to walk more compared to neutrals), suggesting lower fearfulness, compared to victims and neutrals. Thus, in this study high FP seems to be related to low fearfulness, which is opposite to what previously has been found in other experimental and commercial lines. This stresses the need for further research into the genetic and phenotypic correlations between FP and fearfulness in various populations of chickens, especially in commercial lines. Findings from experimental lines should be used with caution when developing control and/or prevention methods that are to be applied in commercial settings. Furthermore, activity and/or coping style might overrule fearfulness within the HFP line, as HFP birds and feather peckers within the HFP line had more active responses. This might indicate a complex interplay between fearfulness, activity and coping style that could play a role in the development of FP.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 150
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Individual consistency of feather pecking behavior in laying hens: once a feather pecker always a feather pecker?
    Daigle, Courtney L.
    Rodenburg, T. Bas
    Bolhuis, J. Elizabeth
    Swanson, Janice C.
    Siegford, Janice M.
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2015, 2
  • [42] A meta-analysis on the effect of environmental enrichment on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens
    van Staaveren, Nienke
    Ellis, Jennifer
    Baes, Christine F.
    Harlander-Matauschek, Alexandra
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2021, 100 (02) : 397 - 411
  • [43] Does preen oil composition differ with feather pecking status in laying hens?
    Sandilands, V
    Powell, K
    Savory, CJ
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2002, 43 (05) : S20 - S22
  • [44] Quantitative Genetic Analysis of Traits Related to Fear and Feather Pecking in Laying Hens
    Vanessa Grams
    Stefanie Bögelein
    Michael A. Grashorn
    Werner Bessei
    Jörn Bennewitz
    Behavior Genetics, 2015, 45 : 228 - 235
  • [45] Selection on feather pecking affects response to novelty and foraging behaviour in laying hens
    de Haas, Elske N.
    Nielsen, Birte L.
    Buitenhuis, A. J.
    Rodenburg, T. Bas
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2010, 124 (3-4) : 90 - 96
  • [46] EFFECTS OF FLOOR TYPE DURING REARING AND OF BEAK TRIMMING ON GROUND PECKING AND FEATHER PECKING IN LAYING HENS
    BLOKHUIS, HJ
    VANDERHAAR, JW
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1989, 22 (3-4) : 359 - 369
  • [47] Analysis of the brain transcriptome in lines of laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking
    Falker-Gieske, Clemens
    Mott, Andrea
    Preuss, Siegfried
    Franzenburg, Soeren
    Bessei, Werner
    Bennewitz, Joern
    Tetens, Jens
    BMC GENOMICS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [48] Can substrate in early rearing prevent feather pecking in adult laying hens?
    de Jong, I. C.
    Reuvekamp, B. F. J.
    Gunnink, H.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2013, 22 (03) : 305 - 314
  • [49] Variance components and selection response for feather-pecking behavior in laying hens
    Su, G
    Kjaer, JB
    Sorensen, P
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2005, 84 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [50] Divergent selection on feather pecking behaviour in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus)
    Kjaer, JB
    Sorensen, P
    Su, G
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2001, 71 (03) : 229 - 239