Local intravascular drug delivery: In vitro comparison of three catheter systems

被引:10
|
作者
Alfke, H [1 ]
Wagner, HJ [1 ]
Calmer, C [1 ]
Klose, KJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-35033 Marburg, Germany
关键词
local drug delivery; restenosis; percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; balloon angioplasty;
D O I
10.1007/s002709900211
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare different catheter systems for local drug delivery with respect to the penetration depth of a biotin marker solution delivered into the vessel wall. Methods: Post-mortem carotid arteries from pigs were locally infused with a biotin solution using three different catheter systems. With all catheters (microporous balloon catheter, hydrogel-coated balloon catheter, and spiral balloon catheter) we used the same pressure of 405 kPa (4 atm) and infusion times of 60, 90, and 300 sec. After infusion the arteries were histologically prepared and stained using a biotin-specific method. With a light microscope an observer, blinded to the catheter type, scored the amount of biotin within the vessel wall, measured as staining intensity, and the penetration depth of the biotin. Results: Delivery with the hydrogel-coated balloon catheter was limited to the intima and the innermost parts of the media. The spiral balloon and microporous balloon catheter showed both a deeper penetration and a larger amount of delivered biotin compared with the hydrogel catheter, with a slightly deeper penetration using the microporous catheter. The penetration depth showed a correlation with infusion time for the spiral balloon and microporous catheters, but not for the hydrogel-coated catheter. Conclusion: Different catheter designs lead to different patterns of local drug delivery. The differences in penetration depth and amount of the substance delivered to the vessel wall should be known and might be useful for targeting specific areas within the vessel wall.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 56
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Local Intravascular Drug Delivery: In Vitro Comparison of Three Catheter Systems
    Heiko Alfke
    Hans-Joachim Wagner
    Christian Calmer
    Klaus Jochen Klose
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 1998, 21 : 50 - 56
  • [2] COMPARISON OF LOCAL INTRAVASCULAR DRUG-DELIVERY CATHETER SYSTEMS
    GONSCHIOR, P
    PAHL, C
    HUEHNS, TY
    GERHEUSER, F
    ERDEMCI, A
    LARISCH, K
    DELLIAN, M
    DEIL, S
    GOETZ, AE
    LEHR, HA
    HOFLING, B
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1995, 130 (06) : 1174 - 1181
  • [3] In vitro and in vivo comparison of three different intravascular ultrasound catheter designs
    Fort, S
    Freeman, NA
    Johnston, P
    Cohen, EA
    Foster, FS
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2001, 52 (03) : 382 - 392
  • [4] Adventitia as a target for intravascular local drug delivery
    Huehns, TY
    Gonschior, P
    Hofling, B
    HEART, 1996, 75 (06) : 537 - 538
  • [5] INTRAVASCULAR LOCAL-DRUG DELIVERY AFTER ANGIOPLASTY
    HOFLING, B
    HUEHNS, TY
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1995, 16 (04) : 437 - 440
  • [6] Visualization and comparison of drug effects after local paclitaxel delivery with different catheter types
    Christian Herdeg
    Martin Oberhoff
    Andreas Baumbach
    Andreas Blattner
    Axel Küttner
    Stephen Schröder
    Karl K. Haase
    Karl R. Karsch
    Basic Research in Cardiology, 1999, 94 : 454 - 463
  • [7] Visualization and comparison of drug effects after local paclitaxel delivery with different catheter types
    Herdeg, C
    Oberhoff, M
    Baumbach, A
    Blattner, A
    Küttner, A
    Schröder, S
    Haase, KK
    Karsch, KR
    BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 94 (06) : 454 - 463
  • [8] Drug transport kinetics of intravascular triggered drug delivery systems
    ten Hagen, Timo L. M.
    Dreher, Matthew R.
    Zalba, Sara
    Seynhaeve, Ann L. B.
    Amin, Mohamadreza
    Li, Li
    Haemmerich, Dieter
    COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY, 2021, 4 (01)
  • [9] Drug transport kinetics of intravascular triggered drug delivery systems
    Timo L. M. ten Hagen
    Matthew R. Dreher
    Sara Zalba
    Ann L. B. Seynhaeve
    Mohamadreza Amin
    Li Li
    Dieter Haemmerich
    Communications Biology, 4
  • [10] Catheter implant systems for intrathecal drug delivery
    Penn, RD
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1996, 84 (04) : 713 - 713