Methane Emissions from Ruminants in Australia: Mitigation Potential and Applicability of Mitigation Strategies

被引:62
|
作者
Black, John L. [1 ]
Davison, Thomas M. [2 ]
Box, Ilona [3 ]
机构
[1] John L Black Consulting, Warrimoo, NSW 2774, Australia
[2] Univ New England, Livestock Prod Partnership, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
[3] Ilona Box Consulting, Warrimoo, NSW 2774, Australia
来源
ANIMALS | 2021年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
enteric methane; methane mitigation; genetic selection; vaccination; grape marc; nitrate; biochar; 3-nitrooxypropanol; Asparagopsis; rumen microbe manipulation; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DIETARY NITRATE SUPPLEMENTATION; RUMEN FERMENTATION; LEUCAENA-LEUCOCEPHALA; BEEF-CATTLE; ASPARAGOPSIS-TAXIFORMIS; CONDENSED TANNIN; BRAHMAN CATTLE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MILK-YIELD;
D O I
10.3390/ani11040951
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Methane is a potent greenhouse gas. It is 80-times more effective at heating the earth than carbon dioxide over the first 20 years following release into the atmosphere. Ruminant animals have diverse microbial populations in their stomachs that employ anaerobic fermentation to digest feed. Methane is belched into the atmosphere as a by-product of the digestive process. This gut, or enteric methane, primarily from cattle, but also sheep and goats, contributes 30% of the methane released into the earth's atmosphere each day, and is more than any other single methane source. A major reduction in methane emissions from ruminants is crucial to preserve ecosystems on the planet. Various strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions in farm operations are reviewed to quantify their mitigation potential, determine their impact on animal productivity and likelihood of adoption. Two feed supplements, a commercial product, 3-NOP (Bovaer(R)), and the seaweed, Asparagopsis, can reduce methane emissions by 40+% and 90%, respectively, with associated increases in animal productivity and no adverse effects on animal health or product quality. The rumen microbial population can also be changed to provide long-term intergenerational reduction in methane emissions, if treated herds remain isolated from non-treated animals. Anthropomorphic greenhouse gases are raising the temperature of the earth and threatening ecosystems. Since 1950 atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased 28%, while methane has increased 70%. Methane, over the first 20 years after release, has 80-times more warming potential as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Enteric methane from microbial fermentation of plant material by ruminants contributes 30% of methane released into the atmosphere, which is more than any other single source. Numerous strategies were reviewed to quantify their methane mitigation potential, their impact on animal productivity and their likelihood of adoption. The supplements, 3-nitrooxypropanol and the seaweed, Asparagopsis, reduced methane emissions by 40+% and 90%, respectively, with increases in animal productivity and small effects on animal health or product quality. Manipulation of the rumen microbial population can potentially provide intergenerational reduction in methane emissions, if treated animals remain isolated. Genetic selection, vaccination, grape marc, nitrate or biochar reduced methane emissions by 10% or less. Best management practices and cattle browsing legumes, Desmanthus or Leucaena species, result in small levels of methane mitigation and improved animal productivity. Feeding large amounts daily of ground wheat reduced methane emissions by around 35% in dairy cows but was not sustained over time.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] New aspects and strategies for methane mitigation from ruminants
    Sanjay Kumar
    Prasanta Kumar Choudhury
    Maria Dolores Carro
    Gareth Wyn Griffith
    Sumit Singh Dagar
    Monica Puniya
    Serena Calabro
    Sreenivas Rao Ravella
    Tejpal Dhewa
    Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay
    Sunil Kumar Sirohi
    Shivlal Singh Kundu
    Metha Wanapat
    Anil Kumar Puniya
    [J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2014, 98 : 31 - 44
  • [2] New aspects and strategies for methane mitigation from ruminants
    Kumar, Sanjay
    Choudhury, Prasanta Kumar
    Dolores Carro, Maria
    Griffith, Gareth Wyn
    Dagar, Sumit Singh
    Puniya, Monica
    Calabro, Serena
    Ravella, Sreenivas Rao
    Dhewa, Tejpal
    Upadhyay, Ramesh Chandra
    Sirohi, Sunil Kumar
    Kundu, Shivlal Singh
    Wanapat, Metha
    Puniya, Anil Kumar
    [J]. APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 98 (01) : 31 - 44
  • [3] Enteric methane mitigation strategies in ruminants: a review
    Ribeiro Pereira, Luiz Gustavo
    Machado, Fernanda S.
    Campos, Mariana M.
    Guimaraes Junior, Roberto
    Tomich, Thierry R.
    Reis, Larissa G.
    Coombs, Cassius
    [J]. REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE CIENCIAS PECUARIAS, 2015, 28 (02) : 124 - 143
  • [4] Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants:A review of plant tannin mitigation options
    Byeng RMin
    Sandra Solaiman
    Heidi MWaldrip
    David Parker
    Richard WTodd
    David Brauer
    [J]. Animal Nutrition., 2020, 6 (03) - 246
  • [5] Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants:A review of plant tannin mitigation options
    Byeng R.Min
    Sandra Solaiman
    Heidi M.Waldrip
    David Parker
    Richard W.Todd
    David Brauer
    [J]. Animal Nutrition, 2020, (03) : 231 - 246
  • [6] Dietary mitigation of enteric methane emissions from ruminants: A review of plant tannin mitigation options
    Min, Byeng R.
    Solaiman, Sandra
    Waldrip, Heidi M.
    Parker, David
    Todd, Richard W.
    Brauer, David
    [J]. ANIMAL NUTRITION, 2020, 6 (03): : 231 - 246
  • [7] Methane emissions from landfills in Serbia and potential mitigation strategies: a case study
    Stanisavljevic, Nemanja
    Ubavin, Dejan
    Batinic, Bojan
    Fellner, Johann
    Vujic, Goran
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2012, 30 (10) : 1095 - 1103
  • [8] Evaluation methods and enteric methane mitigation strategies in ruminants
    Ribeiro Pereira, Luiz Gustavo
    [J]. REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE CIENCIAS PECUARIAS, 2013, 26 : 264 - 277
  • [9] Crop improvement strategies for mitigation of methane emissions from rice
    Balakrishnan, Divya
    Kulkarni, Kalyani
    Latha, P. C.
    Subrahmanyam, D.
    [J]. EMIRATES JOURNAL OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2018, 30 (06): : 451 - 462
  • [10] Decision strategies for policy decisions under uncertainties: The case of mitigation measures addressing methane emissions from ruminants
    Hadorn, Gertrude Hirsch
    Brun, Georg
    Soliva, Carla Riccarda
    Stenke, Andrea
    Peter, Thomas
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 52 : 110 - 119