Comparison of nutritional parameters of substrate solution samples extracted by different sampling methods

被引:0
|
作者
Lao, MT [1 ]
Jiménez, S
Eymar, E
Fernández, EJ
Jiménez, R
机构
[1] Univ Almeria, Escuela Politecn Super, Dept Prod Vegetal, Almeria, Spain
[2] Ctr Invest & Formac Agricola, Dept Hort, Almeria, Spain
[3] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Ciencias C 7, Dept Quim Agr Geol & Geoquim, Madrid, Spain
关键词
saturation extract; pour-trough; drainage; suction cup; Euphorbia pulcherrima;
D O I
10.1081/LCSS-200026825
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The purpose of this work was to compare the analytical results of nutritional parameters of substrate solution samples extracted by different sampling methods. The adopted methods were saturation extract, pour-trough, drainage, and suction cups. The values of nutritional parameters found for samples obtained by means of displacement methods are similar among them and differ from the rest of tested techniques. The pH values were lower in saturation extract. Soluble element contents were similar in saturation extract and suction cups, whereas less-soluble salts, such as phosphates and calcium, are found in higher concentrations by the saturation extract method.
引用
收藏
页码:1967 / 1979
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of eggshell membrane protein extracted effects by different methods
    Liu, Y. (759673079@qq.com), 1600, Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (30):
  • [2] Sampling and substrate application methods for pesticide mineralization experiments in undisturbed soil samples
    Fomsgaard, IS
    Felding, G
    Schjonning, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1998, 70 (1-4) : 121 - 132
  • [3] COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS FOR MEASURING AMMONIUM IN SOLUTION SAMPLES
    SCOTT, TJ
    MITCHELL, MJ
    SANTOS, A
    DESTAFFEN, P
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1989, 20 (11-12) : 1131 - 1144
  • [4] NONUNIFORM SAMPLING OF URODYNAMIC SIGNALS - A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS
    KOCJAN, T
    VANMASTRIGT, R
    UROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1994, 22 (03): : 137 - 141
  • [5] The imbalance problem: A comparison of sampling approaches using different parameters and feature selection methods in the context of classification
    Morillo-Salas, Jose L.
    Bolon-Canedo, Veronica
    Alonso-Betanzos, Amparo
    EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2024, 41 (08)
  • [6] Sampling harmful benthic dinoflagellates: Comparison of artificial and natural substrate methods
    Tester, Patricia A.
    Kibler, Steven R.
    Holland, William C.
    Usup, Gires
    Vandersea, Mark W.
    Leaw, Chui Pin
    Teen, Lim Po
    Larsen, Jacob
    Mohammad-Noor, Normawaty
    Faust, Maria A.
    Litaker, R. Wayne
    HARMFUL ALGAE, 2014, 39 : 8 - 25
  • [7] Convenience Sampling Methods in Psychology: A Comparison Between Crowdsourced and Student Samples
    Novielli, Julia
    Kane, Leanne
    Ashbaugh, Andrea R.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DU COMPORTEMENT, 2023,
  • [8] COMPARISON OF 2 DIFFERENT METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF RDNA HIRUDIN IN PLASMA SAMPLES - HPLC VS A CHROMOGENIC THROMBIN SUBSTRATE
    GROETSCH, H
    DAMM, D
    BENYOUSSEF, R
    HAERTEL, D
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 1991, 64 (02) : 273 - 277
  • [9] Comparison of the Essential Oils Extracted from HERBA MENTHAE by Different Methods
    Chengyuan LIANG
    Xu YU
    Weilin LI
    Medicinal Plant, 2014, (01) : 5 - 6
  • [10] Comparison of estimation methods for Weibull parameters: Complete and censored samples
    Hossain, AM
    Zimmer, WJ
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2003, 73 (02) : 145 - 153