Analytic signal extraction approach based on 2D Grating Interferometer and systematic comparison between 2D GI and 1D case

被引：1

作者：

Ju, Z. ^{[1
]}

Wang, Y. ^{[1
]}

Li, P. ^{[1
]}

Zhu, Z. ^{[1
]}

Zhang, K. ^{[1
]}

Huang, W. ^{[1
]}

Yuan, Q. ^{[1
]}

Wu, Z. ^{[2
]}

Zhu, P. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst High Energy Phys, Yuquan Rd, Beijing, Peoples R China

[2] Univ Sci & Technol China, Natl Synchrotron Radiat Lab, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China

来源：

JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION | 2016年 / 11卷

基金：

中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

Interferometry; Image reconstruction in medical imaging; Medical-image reconstruction methods and algorithms; computer-aided diagnosis; HARD X-RAYS; TALBOT INTERFEROMETRY;

D O I：

10.1088/1748-0221/11/03/C03031

中图分类号：

TH7 [仪器、仪表];

学科分类号：

0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;

摘要：

X-ray imaging method based on 2D grating interferometer was proposed and studied recently, to overcome the limitations in signal extraction and phase retrieval when using 1D grating interferometer. In this paper, the concept of angle-signal response function is proposed, and different surfaces of different 2D setups under the condition of parallel coherent light are calculated and depicted with Matlab. Based on this concept, performance of 2D grating interferometer is systematically analyzed and an analytic 2D signal extraction approach is theoretically proposed. Besides, signal extraction, phase retrieval and feasibility of using conventional source are also briefly discussed and compared between 2D grating interferometer and 1D case.

引用

页数：13

共 50 条

[1] Fabrication of 1D and 2D grating structures
Stepanov, Dmitrii Yu.
Surve, Sachin
2006 OPTICAL FIBER COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE/NATIONAL FIBER OPTIC ENGINEERS CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2006, : 2427 - 2429
[2] A novel approach to the 2D analytic signal
Bülow, T
Sommer, G
COMPUTER ANALYSIS OF IMAGES AND PATTERNS, 1999, 1689 : 25 - 32
[3] Systematic comparison of 1D and 2D hydrodynamic models for the assessment of hydropeaking alterations
Burgler, Matthias
Vetsch, David F.
Boes, Robert
Vanzo, Davide
RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 39 (03) : 460 - 477
[4] Comparison between 1D and 2D models for hydraulic modeling of a floodplain: case of Garonne river
Besnard, Amelie
Goutal, Nicole
HOUILLE BLANCHE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE L EAU, 2011, (03): : 42 - 47
[5] 1D Nanoribbons of 2D Materials
Li, Xuan
Huang, Jiongpeng
Zhang, Yifan
Shi, Lei
PROGRESS IN CHEMISTRY, 2023, 35 (01) : 88 - 104
[6] 1D metals for 2D electronics
Jolie, Wouter
Michely, Thomas
NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2024, 19 (07) : 883 - 884
[7] Classification of 1D and 2D Orbifolds
Nilse, Lars
SUSY06: The 14th International Conference on Supersymmetry and the Unification of Fundamental Interactions, 2007, 903 : 411 - 414
[8] OCT Denoising Performance Comparison on 2D and 1D Approaches
Chen, Zhiqi
Zambrano, Ronald
Wollstein, Gadi
Schuman, Joel S.
Ishikawa, Hiroshi
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2021, 62 (08)
[9] Comparison of 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopy for metabolic profiling
Van, Que N.
Issaq, Haleem J.
Jiang, Qiujie
Li, Qiaoli
Muschik, Gary M.
Waybright, Timothy J.
Lou, Hong
Dean, Michael
Uitto, Jouni
Veenstra, Timothy D.
JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2008, 7 (02) : 630 - 639
[10] Comparison of 1D, 2D and 3D quench onset simulations
Stenvall, A.
Mikkonen, R.
Kovac, P.
PHYSICA C-SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2010, 470 (22): : 2047 - 2050

← 1 2 3 4 5 →