Comparison of 1D, 2D and 3D quench onset simulations

被引:8
|
作者
Stenvall, A. [1 ]
Mikkonen, R. [1 ]
Kovac, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tampere Univ Technol, FI-33101 Tampere, Finland
[2] Slovak Acad Sci, Inst Elect Engn, Bratislava 84104, Slovakia
来源
关键词
Finite element method; MgB(2); Minimum quench energy; Normal zone propagation velocity; Simulation; MAGNETS; SUPERCONDUCTORS; STABILITY; ENERGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.physc.2010.09.010
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
Measured and simulated minimum quench energies (MQE) for short samples are doubtful when estimating disturbance tolerance of an impregnated superconducting magnet. If measurements are performed at liquid cryogen, the cooling provided by the cryogen causes MQE to be high. At a conduction-cooled system, the transverse heat conduction is neglected causing low MQE. Even though these conditions can be artificially brought closer to the ones in an impregnated magnet, it is difficult to estimate by short-sample measurement the MQE of a superconducting coil. These similar difficulties are present at simulations. On the other hand, 1D and 2D measurements and simulations can be used, e.g., to compare wires or consider effect of insulation layer thickness, but according to the results only in a rough quantitative way. In this paper, we compare MQE and normal zone propagation velocity simulations of an MgB(2) wire with ID, 2D and 3D finite element method models to focus on the different results given by the models employing different dimensions. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2047 / 2050
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simulations of the ripening of 3D, 2D and 1D objects
    Bonafos, C
    Colombeau, B
    Carrada, M
    Altibelli, A
    Claverie, A
    [J]. MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING B-SOLID STATE MATERIALS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 88 (2-3): : 112 - 117
  • [2] CFD simulations of bubble column reactors: 1D, 2D and 3D approach
    Ekambara, K
    Dhotre, MT
    Joshi, JB
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2005, 60 (23) : 6733 - 6746
  • [3] The Hanle effect in 1D, 2D and 3D
    Sainz, RM
    Trujillo Bueno, J
    [J]. SOLAR POLARIZATION, 1999, 243 : 143 - +
  • [4] Laser Solitons in 1D, 2D and 3D
    Rosanov, Nikolay N.
    Fedorov, Sergey, V
    Veretenov, Nikolay A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL D, 2019, 73 (07):
  • [5] Laser Solitons in 1D, 2D and 3D
    Nikolay N. Rosanov
    Sergey V. Fedorov
    Nikolay A. Veretenov
    [J]. The European Physical Journal D, 2019, 73
  • [6] 3D, 2D, 1D - ADLER,DA
    BERNSTEIN, JE
    [J]. YOUNG CHILDREN, 1976, 31 (04): : 316 - 316
  • [7] Statistics of detonation confinement: 1D, 2D and 3D simulations in hydrogen-oxygen
    Paknahad, Reza
    Lipkowicz, Jonathan T.
    Gaffran, Noah
    Wlokas, Irenaeus
    Kempf, Andreas M.
    Crane, Jackson
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE, 2024, 40 (1-4)
  • [8] A comparison of 2D and 3D simulations of the River Blackwater
    Barrett, Lawrence
    Wright, Nigel G.
    Sterling, Mark
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING AND COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2011, 164 (04) : 217 - 232
  • [9] Comparison analysis of 1D/2D/3D neutronics modeling for a fusion reactor
    Li, J.
    Zeng, Q.
    Chen, M.
    Jiang, J.
    Zheng, S.
    [J]. FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2008, 83 (10-12) : 1678 - 1682
  • [10] Synthesis of 1D, 2D, and 3D structures of phosphorus
    Ji, Haifeng
    Smith, Joshua
    Hagaman, Daniel
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 252