The Stroop Incongruity Effect: Congruity Relationship Reaches Beyond the Stroop Task

被引:11
|
作者
Hatukai, Tatiana [1 ]
Algom, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Psychol Sci, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
conflict; emotion; non-Stroop dimensions; Stroop effect; valence; ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; AUTOMATIC ACTIVATION; DECISION-MAKING; CONFLICT; AVOIDANCE; INTERFERENCE; INFORMATION; STIMULUS; MODEL; DIMENSIONS;
D O I
10.1037/xhp0000381
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Stroop objects are defined by the existence of a logical relationship, congruity or incongruity, between their constituent dimensions. The Stroop effect is the difference in performance between congruent and incongruent stimuli with respect to one of these dimensions. However, the pair of Stroop generating dimensions does not exhaust all dimensions of the object. In this study, we examined performance with respect to a third non-Stroop dimension of an otherwise Stroop object, a dimension that is unrelated to those generating the Stroop effect. We witnessed a reversal of the usual Stroop pattern with respect to the third dimension, the Incongruity Effect. Performance was superior with Stroop-incongruent stimuli despite the fact that congruity was defined with respect to another pair of dimensions. In 8 experiments, we first documented the Incongruity Effect and then tested possible explanations. We conclude that the best account is associated with the notion that Stroop-incongruent stimuli engender negative affect that people strive to swiftly terminate.
引用
收藏
页码:1098 / 1114
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How should the stroop interference effect be measured? Further evidence from alternative versions of the stroop task
    Chen, JY
    [J]. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1997, 84 (03) : 1123 - 1133
  • [22] TIME PERCEPTION AND THE STROOP TASK
    MARSHALL, MJ
    WILSONCROFT, WE
    [J]. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1989, 69 (03) : 1159 - 1162
  • [23] Negative compatibility effect with Stroop-like task
    Yagi, Y
    Kikuchi, T
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 39 (5-6) : 538 - 538
  • [24] Effect of language dominance on cognitive processes in a stroop task
    Bahri, T
    Bendania, A
    [J]. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1997, 84 (03) : 979 - 988
  • [25] Sentence interference in the Stroop task
    Angela G. Brega
    Alice F. Healy
    [J]. Memory & Cognition, 1999, 27 : 768 - 778
  • [26] The emotional stroop task and psychopathology
    Williams, JMG
    Mathews, A
    MacLeod, C
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 120 (01) : 3 - 24
  • [27] Sentence interference in the Stroop task
    Brega, AG
    Healy, AF
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 1999, 27 (05) : 768 - 778
  • [28] The effect of pain on cognitive flexibility assessed with Stroop task
    Dondas, C.
    Munteanu, C.
    Iorga, M.
    Rey, A.
    Thar, M.
    Mazza, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 48 : S233 - S234
  • [29] Neural correlates of distance and congruity effects in a numerical Stroop task: an event-related fMRI study
    Kaufmann, L
    Koppelstaetter, F
    Delazer, M
    Siedentopf, C
    Rhomberg, P
    Golaszewski, S
    Felber, S
    Ischebeck, A
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2005, 25 (03) : 888 - 898
  • [30] Limitations of cognitive control on emotional distraction – Congruency in the Color Stroop task does not modulate the Emotional Stroop effect
    Elisa Ruth Straub
    Constantin Schmidts
    Wilfried Kunde
    Jinhui Zhang
    Andrea Kiesel
    David Dignath
    [J]. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2022, 22 : 21 - 41