Pole-to-pole validation of Envisat GOMOS ozone profiles using data from ground-based and balloon sonde measurements

被引:42
|
作者
Meijer, YJ
Swart, DPJ
Allaart, M
Andersen, SB
Bodeker, G
Boyd, I
Braathen, G
Calisesi, Y
Claude, H
Dorokhov, V
von der Gathen, P
Gil, M
Godin-Beekmann, S
Goutail, F
Hansen, G
Karpetchko, A
Keckhut, P
Kelder, HM
Koelemeijer, R
Kois, B
Koopman, RM
Kopp, G
Lambert, JC
Leblanc, T
McDermid, IS
Pal, S
Schets, H
Stubi, R
Suortti, T
Visconti, G
Yela, M
机构
[1] RIVM, Environm Risks & Safety Div, Environm Measurements Lab, Nat Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[2] Royal Netherlands Meteorol Inst, NL-3730 AE De Bilt, Netherlands
[3] Danish Meteorol Inst, Dept Res & Dev, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, Lauder, New Zealand
[5] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Astron, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[6] Norwegian Inst Air Res, N-2027 Kjeller, Norway
[7] Univ Bern, Inst Appl Phys, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[8] Deutsch Wetterdienst, Meteorol Observ, D-82383 Hohenpeissenberg, Germany
[9] Cent Aerol Observ, Moscow, Russia
[10] Inst Nacl Tecn Aeroespacial, E-28850 Torrejon de Ardoz, Spain
[11] Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Serv Aeron, F-75252 Paris 05, France
[12] CNRS, Serv Aeron, F-91371 Verrieres Le Buisson, France
[13] Norwegian Inst Air Res, N-9001 Tromso, Norway
[14] Finnish Meteorol Inst, FI-99600 Sodankyla, Finland
[15] Univ Versailles Saint Quentin, Inst Pierre Simon Laplace, F-91371 Verrieres Le Buisson, France
[16] RIVM, Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[17] Inst Meteorol & Water Management, PL-00629 Warsaw, Poland
[18] European Space Agcy, I-00044 Frascati, Italy
[19] Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Inst Meteorol & Klimaforsch, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
[20] Space Aeron Inst Belgium, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium
[21] Table Mt Observ, Jet Propuls Lab, Wrightwood, CA 92397 USA
[22] Royal Meteorol Inst Belgium, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium
[23] MeteoSwiss, Stn Aerol, CH-1530 Payerne, Switzerland
[24] Univ Aquila, Dept Phys, I-67010 Coppito, Italy
[25] Alfred Wegener Inst Polar & Marine Res, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[26] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Fac Appl Phys, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
GOMOS; Envisat; ozone profile; validation; stratosphere; remote sensing;
D O I
10.1029/2004JD004834
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
In March 2002 the European Space Agency (ESA) launched the polar-orbiting environmental satellite Envisat. One of its nine instruments is the Global Ozone Monitoring by Occultation of Stars (GOMOS) instrument, which is a medium-resolution stellar occultation spectrometer measuring vertical profiles of ozone. In the first year after launch a large group of scientists performed additional measurements and validation activities to assess the quality of Envisat observations. In this paper, we present validation results of GOMOS ozone profiles from comparisons to microwave radiometer, balloon ozonesonde, and lidar measurements worldwide. Thirty-one instruments/ launch sites at twenty-five stations ranging from the Arctic to the Antarctic joined in this activity. We identified 6747 collocated observations that were performed within an 800-km radius and a maximum 20-hour time difference of a satellite observation, for the period between 1 July 2002 and 1 April 2003. The GOMOS data analyzed here have been generated with a prototype processor that corresponds to version 4.02 of the operational GOMOS processor. The GOMOS data initially contained many obviously unrealistic values, most of which were successfully removed by imposing data quality criteria. Analyzing the effect of these criteria indicated, among other things, that for some specific stars, only less than 10% of their occultations yield an acceptable profile. The total number of useful collocated observations was reduced to 2502 because of GOMOS data unavailability, the imposed data quality criteria, and lack of altitude overlap. These collocated profiles were compared, and the results were analyzed for possible dependencies on several geophysical (e.g., latitude) and GOMOS observational (e.g., star characteristics) parameters. We find that GOMOS data quality is strongly dependent on the illumination of the limb through which the star is observed. Data measured under bright limb conditions, and to a certain extent also in twilight limb, should be used with caution, as their usability is doubtful. In dark limb the GOMOS data agree very well with the correlative data, and between 14- and 64-km altitude their differences only show a small (2.5-7.5%) insignificant negative bias with a standard deviation of 11-16% (19-63 km). This conclusion was demonstrated to be independent of the star temperature and magnitude and the latitudinal region of the GOMOS observation, with the exception of a slightly larger bias in the polar regions at altitudes between 35 and 45 km.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Retrieval of ozone mixing ratio profiles from ground-based millimeter wave measurements disturbed by standing waves
    Kuntz, M
    Hochschild, G
    Krupa, R
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D18) : 21965 - 21975
  • [32] RETRIEVAL OF OZONE ALTITUDE PROFILES FROM THE GROUND-BASED MEASUREMENTS OF THE INTEGRAL ABSORPTION IN THE MILLIMETER-WAVE RANGE
    KULIKOV, YY
    MARKINA, NN
    NAUMOV, AP
    RYSKIN, VG
    SUMIN, MI
    SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION ( ICAP 89 ), PARTS 1-2, 1989, 301 : B307 - B309
  • [33] Evaluation of ozone measurements from a tethered balloon-sampling platform at South Pole Station in December 2003
    Johnson, Bryan J.
    Helmig, Detlev
    Oltmans, Samuel J.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 42 (12) : 2780 - 2787
  • [34] Validation and Trend Analysis of Stratospheric Ozone Data from Ground-Based Observations at Lauder, New Zealand
    Bernet, Leonie
    Boyd, Ian
    Nedoluha, Gerald
    Querel, Richard
    Swart, Daan
    Hocke, Klemens
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [35] Validation of daily erythemal doses from Ozone Monitoring Instrument with ground-based UV measurement data
    Tanskanen, Aapo
    Lindfors, Anders
    Maatta, Anu
    Krotkov, Nickolay
    Herman, Jay
    Kaurola, Jussi
    Koskela, Tapani
    Lakkala, Kaisa
    Fioletov, Vitali
    Bernhard, Germar
    McKenzie, Richard
    Kondo, Yutaka
    O'Neill, Michael
    Slaper, Harry
    den Outer, Peter
    Bais, Alkiviadis F.
    Tamminen, Johanna
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2007, 112 (D24)
  • [36] REMOTE AND GROUND-BASED MEASUREMENTS OF OZONE PROFILES DURING THE MAP-GLOBUS 1983 CAMPAIGN
    DELANOE, J
    BRILLET, J
    TURATI, C
    MEGIE, G
    GODIN, S
    PELON, J
    MARCHE, P
    BARBE, A
    GIBBINS, CJ
    DAWKINS, AWJ
    MATTHEWS, WA
    PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 1987, 35 (05) : 547 - 562
  • [37] Comparison of total ozone and erythemal UV data from OMI with ground-based measurements at Rome station
    Ialongo, I.
    Casale, G. R.
    Siani, A. M.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2008, 8 (12) : 3283 - 3289
  • [38] Validation of Integrated Water-Vapor Content from GNSS Data of Ground-Based Measurements
    V. V. Kalinnikov
    O. G. Khutorova
    Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 2019, 55 : 352 - 356
  • [39] Validation of Integrated Water-Vapor Content from GNSS Data of Ground-Based Measurements
    Kalinnikov, V. V.
    Khutorova, O. G.
    IZVESTIYA ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC PHYSICS, 2019, 55 (04) : 352 - 356
  • [40] Retrieval of atmospheric refractivity profiles from ground-based GPS measurements
    Notarpietro, R
    Gabella, M
    Perona, G
    OCCULTATIONS FOR PROBING ATMOSPHERE AND CLIMATE, 2004, : 99 - 107