Impact of adhesive system generation and light curing units on orthodontic bonding: In vitro study

被引:1
|
作者
Dallel, Ines [1 ]
Lahwar, Sadam [2 ]
Jerbi, Mouhamed Ali [1 ]
Tobji, Samir [1 ]
Ben Amor, Adel [1 ]
Kassab, Asma [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Monastir, Res Lab Oral Hlth & Buccofacial Rehabil LR12ES11, Orthodont Dept, Monastir, Tunisia
[2] Univ Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
[3] Univ Monastir, Dent Med Fac, Res Lab Oral Hlth & Buccofacial Rehabil LR 12ES11, Monastir, Tunisia
关键词
Adhesive system; generation; Bracket bond; Forces; Light curing; SELF-ETCH; STRENGTH; ENAMEL; PRIMER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ortho.2019.08.020
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective > We aimed to compare adhesive performance of fourth, fifth and seventh generation adhesive systems (GASs) and the effect of two different light curing units on shear bond strength (SBS). Materials and methods > One hundred and twenty extracted human upper premolars were divided in four groups. Bonds were assessed as following: group 1 using 4th GAS, group 2 using 5th GAS, group 3 and 4 using 7th GAS with two different light curing units (1500 and 800mw/cm(2)). Adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were counted. Results > Group 1 and 2 showed similar SBSs (P = 0.7) which were significantly higher than group 3 (P = 0.0002). Group 4 exhibited significantly the weakest SBS with mean = 2.15 +/- 0.25. Applying shear forces less than 15 MPa on group 3 bonds led to the release of almost all of the of brackets. Whereas, applying the same forces on group 2 bonds leads to the release of 66.7% of brackets. Notably, only 40% of brackets in group 1 were debonded. Group 4 brackets were totally debonded when applying shear forces less than 10 MPa. While ARI = 0 was the most frequent in group 1, ARI = 3 was the most frequent in group 3. Conclusion > Fourth and fifth GASs showed similar SBS higher than seventh GAS. Fourth GAS bonds were able to resist longer against traction forces than those set up by fifth generation. Seventh GAS bonds offered the least efficient resistance. ARI = 0 was the highest in group 1. However, Group 4 showed the highest ARI = 1 and ARI = 2 revealing cohesive failure. We also found that the adhesive power is proportional to the power of the lamp used. In fact, we concluded that 1500 mw/cm(2) units light curing during 30 seconds generated an ideal energy to enhance orthodontic bracket adhesion.
引用
收藏
页码:799 / 805
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effect of the light curing source and of the photoinitiation system on the light cured adhesive systems
    Ionas, M.
    Moldovan, M.
    Pascalau, V.
    Delean, A.
    Ionas, T.
    OPTOELECTRONICS AND ADVANCED MATERIALS-RAPID COMMUNICATIONS, 2010, 4 (08): : 1215 - 1218
  • [32] Comparative bonding ability to dentin of a universal adhesive system and monomer conversion as functions of extended light curing times and storage
    Pinheiro Sampaio, Paula Costa
    Kruly, Paula de Castro
    Ribeiro, Clara Cabral
    Hilgert, Leandro Augusto
    Rodrigues Pereira, Patricia Nobrega
    Candia Scaffa, Polliana Mendes
    Di Hipolito, Vinicius
    Perlatti D'Alpino, Paulo Henrique
    Pimentel Garcia, Fernanda Cristina
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2017, 75 : 41 - 49
  • [33] Comparison of Light-Emitting Diode-Curing Unit and Halogen-Based Light-Curing Unit for the Polymerization of Orthodontic Resins: An In vitro Study
    Guram, Guneet
    Shaik, Junaid Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF PREVENTIVE AND COMMUNITY DENTISTRY, 2018, 8 (05): : 409 - 415
  • [34] Evaluation of physical and adhesive properties of enamel after a therapeutic dose of radiation and bonding of orthodontic metal brackets: an in vitro study
    Anushree, A.
    Shetty, Ashutosh
    Soans, Crystal Runa
    Kuttappa, M. N.
    Shetty, Akhil
    Shetty, Kaushik
    Nayak, U. S. Krishna
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2021, 20 (01) : 78 - 82
  • [35] Comparative evaluation of third-generation LED-light curing units and their effect on bulk-fill composites-An in vitro study
    Puri, Aakansha
    Prathap, M. S.
    Jayaprakash, K.
    Sreegowri
    Jose, Jeslee A.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 16 (02): : 166 - 173
  • [36] Comparison of bonding characteristics of a newly introduced light cure adhesive system with conventional adhesive system
    Philip, Anju Mary
    Pillai, S. Babukuttan
    Kumar, G. Sreejith
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTIC REHABILITATION, 2020, 11 (03) : 106 - 111
  • [37] Comparison of the Amount of Temperature Rise in the Pulp Chamber of Teeth Treated With QTH, Second and Third Generation LED Light Curing Units: An In Vitro Study
    Mahant, Rajesh Harivadanbhai
    Chokshi, Shraddha
    Vaidya, Rupal
    Patel, Pruthvi
    Vora, Asima
    Mahant, Priyanka
    JOURNAL OF LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 7 (03) : 184 - 191
  • [38] An in vitro study of the bond strength of light-cured glass ionomer cement in the bonding of orthodontic brackets
    Cook, PA
    Luther, F
    Youngson, CC
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1996, 18 (02) : 199 - 204
  • [39] Using Hemostatic Agents During Orthodontic Bonding: An In Vitro Study
    Akdeniz, Berat Serdar
    Oz, Abdullah Alper
    Arici, Nursel
    Demir, Onur
    Arici, Selim
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2015, 28 (02) : 38 - 43
  • [40] In vitro performance of an autocured universal adhesive system in bonding to dentin
    Kibe, Kota
    Hatayama, Takashi
    Shimada, Yasushi
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)