The screening history of women with cervical cancer in the Rotterdam area

被引:14
|
作者
Kreuger, FAF [1 ]
Beerman, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Municipal Hlth Serv Rotterdam & Environms, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Policy, NL-3000 LP Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
cervical cancer; inadequate follow-up; interval cancers; screening history;
D O I
10.1023/A:1007695001384
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: In order to gain insight into the diagnostic effectiveness of the screening program on cervical cancer in the Rotterdam area, the history of women with cervical cancer was studied. Three questions were asked: (1) What percentage of women were invited to the screening program, and what percentage participated. (2) What percentage of women had had a negative smear within 3 years before cancer was diagnosed, and (3) What percentage of women encountered inadequate follow-up. Methods: All the cytological and histological results of women who were diagnosed with cervical carcinoma between 1992-1994 were studied. Results: Within 3 years of the diagnosis, 42% of the 165 women with cervical cancer were invited for the cervical screening program. A total of 47% were too old to be invited and 10% were too young. A total of 37% of the women who were invited participated in the screening program. A total of 33 (20%) of 165 women with cervical carcinoma had had a negative smear within three years preceding the diagnosis. For women under 34 years of age this was 41% (n = 7), and for women over 56 years 8% (n = 6). A total of 7% of all women with cervical cancer encountered inadequate follow-up. Conclusion: Many women with a diagnosis of cervical cancer are too old to be invited for the cervical screening program. Relatively few of the women with cervical cancer who were invited for the screening program actually participated in this program.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:641 / 645
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Differences in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among US Women by Nativity and Family History
    Donley, Tiffany
    Tshiswaka, Daudet Ilunga
    Blanc, Judite
    Seixas, Azizi
    Okafor, Anthony
    Mbizo, Justice
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2020, 59 (04) : 578 - 587
  • [32] Association of Pregnancy History and Cervical Cancer Screening in a Community Sample of Sexual Minority Women
    Greene, Madelyne Z.
    Hughes, Tonda L.
    Sommers, Marilyn S.
    Hanlon, Alexandra
    Meghani, Salimah H.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2019, 28 (04) : 526 - 534
  • [33] Screening history of women with cervical cancer: a 6-year study in Aarhus, Denmark
    O Ingemann-Hansen
    M Lidang
    I Niemann
    J Dinesen
    U Baandrup
    H Svanholm
    L K Petersen
    British Journal of Cancer, 2008, 98 : 1292 - 1294
  • [34] Access to Personal Health Records and Screening for Breast and Cervical Cancer Among Women with a Family History of Cancer
    Kim, Hyunmin
    Mahmood, Asos
    Carlton, Erik
    Goldsmith, Joy
    Chang, Cyril
    Bhuyan, Soumitra
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2020, 35 (06) : 1128 - 1134
  • [35] Cervical cancer screening among homeless women
    Bharel, M
    Blackstock, O
    O'Connell, J
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 : 111 - 111
  • [36] SCREENING FOR CERVICAL-CANCER IN ELDERLY WOMEN
    LEWIS, LS
    LANCET, 1990, 335 (8685): : 357 - 357
  • [37] Cervical Cancer Screening of Women With Schizophrenia in Taiwan
    Lin, Herng-Ching
    Yang, Ling-Yu
    Chiu, Wen-Ta
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2010, 61 (03) : 327 - 328
  • [38] Cervical cancer screening among Sudanese women
    Hassan, F.
    KhirElseed, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2009, 39 : 9 - 9
  • [39] Access to Personal Health Records and Screening for Breast and Cervical Cancer Among Women with a Family History of Cancer
    Hyunmin Kim
    Asos Mahmood
    Erik Carlton
    Joy Goldsmith
    Cyril Chang
    Soumitra Bhuyan
    Journal of Cancer Education, 2020, 35 : 1128 - 1134
  • [40] Immigrant women and cervical cancer screening uptake
    Woltman, Kelly J.
    Newbold, K. Bruce
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2007, 98 (06): : 470 - 475