Comparison of aerosol chemistry transport model simulations with lidar and Sun photometer observations at a site near Paris

被引:38
|
作者
Hodzic, A [1 ]
Chepfer, H
Vautard, R
Chazette, P
Beekmann, M
Bessagnet, B
Chatenet, B
Cuesta, J
Drobinski, P
Goloub, P
Haeffelin, M
Morille, Y
机构
[1] Inst Pierre Simon Laplace, Meteorol Dynam Lab, F-91128 Palaiseau 1, France
[2] Inst Pierre Simon Laplace, Lab Sci Climat & Environm, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette, France
[3] Inst Pierre Simon Laplace, Serv Aeron, F-75252 Paris, France
[4] INERIS, F-60550 Verneuil En Halatte, France
[5] Lab Interuniv Syst Atmospher, F-94010 Creteil, France
[6] Lab Opt Atmospher, Lille, France
关键词
aerosol modeling; aerosol optical properties; lidar profile; model validation; vertical distribution of aerosols;
D O I
10.1029/2004JD004735
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The ability of the aerosol chemistry transport model CHIMERE to simulate the vertical aerosol concentration profiles at a site near the city of Paris is evaluated using routine elastic backscatter lidar and Sun photometer measurements. The comparisons of model aerosols with measurements are carried out over a full year time period between October 2002 and September 2003. The methodology we propose here is new: From the model concentration outputs ( optical properties varying with chemical composition and mass vertical distribution) we simulate the lidar backscattering profiles and compare them with the observed ones. The comparisons demonstrate the ability of the model to reproduce correctly the aerosol vertical distributions and their temporal variability. However, the aerosol load within the boundary layer is generally underestimated by the model, in particular during the afternoon hours and the summertime period. Several sensitivity tests indicate that this underestimation may have two origins: the lack of secondary organic and, to a lesser extent, mineral aerosols inside the model. The second deficiency is due to the absence of erosion/resuspension of soil material in the primary aerosol sources considered here; the first deficiency is probably due to incomplete knowledge about the formation of organic species in a photochemically active atmosphere. The results also show that the particles ranging from 0.08 to 1.25 mum in radius represent more than 89% of the volume backscattering at 532 nm, while the coarse particles are not efficient in terms of optical properties. The missing aerosol mass must therefore be found within the accumulation mode.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Aerosol data assimilation in the MOCAGE chemical transport model during the TRAQA/ChArMEx campaign: lidar observations
    El Amraoui, Laaziz
    Sic, Bojan
    Piacentini, Andrea
    Marecal, Virginie
    Frebourg, Nicolas
    Attie, Jean-Luc
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2020, 13 (09) : 4645 - 4667
  • [22] Chemistry-transport model comparison with ozone observations in the midlatitude lowermost stratosphere
    Bregman, A
    Krol, MC
    Teyssèdre, H
    Norton, WA
    Iwi, A
    Chipperfield, M
    Pitari, G
    Sundet, JK
    Lelieveld, J
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2001, 106 (D15): : 17479 - 17496
  • [23] Aerosols Direct Radiative Effects Combined Ground-Based Lidar and Sun-Photometer Observations: Cases Comparison between Haze and Dust Events in Beijing
    Liang, Yuanxin
    Che, Huizheng
    Wang, Hong
    Zhang, Wenjie
    Li, Lei
    Zheng, Yu
    Gui, Ke
    Zhang, Peng
    Zhang, Xiaoye
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [24] Temporal variations in sun photometer measured precipitable water in near IR band and its comparison with model estimates at a tropical Indian station
    Raj, P. Ernest
    Devara, P. C. S.
    Saha, S. K.
    Sonbawne, S. M.
    Dani, K. K.
    Pandithurai, G.
    Murthy, A. Ramana
    ATMOSFERA, 2008, 21 (04): : 317 - 333
  • [25] Climatological assessment of the vertically resolved optical and microphysical aerosol properties by lidar measurements, sun photometer, and in situ observations over 17 years at Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) Barcelona
    Lolli, Simone
    Sicard, Michael
    Amato, Francesco
    Comeron, Adolfo
    Gil-Diaz, Cristina
    Landi, Tony C.
    Munoz-Porcar, Constantino
    Oliveira, Daniel
    Dios Otin, Federico
    Rocadenbosch, Francesc
    Rodriguez-Gomez, Alejandro
    Alastuey, Andres
    Querol, Xavier
    Reche, Cristina
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2023, 23 (19) : 12887 - 12906
  • [26] Lidar Observations of a Mesoscale Moisture Transport Event Impacting Convection and Comparison to Rapid Refresh Model Analysis
    Carroll, Brian J.
    Demoz, Belay B.
    Turner, David D.
    Delgado, Ruben
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2021, 149 (02) : 463 - 477
  • [27] Comparison of ADCP observations and 3D model simulations of turbulence at a tidal energy site
    Togneri, Michael
    Lewis, Matt
    Neill, Simon
    Masters, Ian
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2017, 114 : 273 - 282
  • [28] Past and future simulations of NO2 from a coupled chemistry-climate model in comparison with observations
    Struthers, H
    Kreher, K
    Austin, J
    Schofield, R
    Bodeker, G
    Johnston, P
    Shiona, H
    Thomas, A
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2004, 4 : 2227 - 2239
  • [29] Forcing mechanisms governing diurnal, seasonal, and interannual variability in the boundary layer depths: Five years of continuous lidar observations over a suburban site near Paris
    Pal, Sandip
    Haeffelin, Martial
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2015, 120 (23) : 11,936 - 11,956
  • [30] Impact of Southeast Asian smoke on aerosol properties in Southwest China: First comparison of model simulations with satellite and ground observations
    Zhu, Jun
    Xia, Xiangao
    Wang, Jun
    Zhang, Jinqiang
    Wiedinmyer, Christine
    Fisher, Jenny A.
    Keller, Christoph A.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2017, 122 (07) : 3904 - 3919