Is there an increased risk of cesarean section in obese women after induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study

被引:17
|
作者
Bjorklund, Jenny [1 ,2 ]
Wiberg-Itzel, Eva [1 ,2 ]
Wallstrom, Tove [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Soderhosp, Dept Clin Sci & Educ, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Soderhospital, Womens Clin, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0263685
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Obesity is increasing in Sweden and is also of huge global concern. Obesity increases the risk of complications during pregnancy and the need for the induction of labor. Induction of labor increases the number of complications during delivery, leading to women with more negative birth experience. This study investigated how maternal body mass index (BMI) during antenatal care enrollment affects labor outcomes (proportion of cesarean section at induction of labor). Method This was a retrospective cohort study of 3772 women with mixed parity and induction of labor at Soderhospital, Stockholm, in 2009-2010 and 2012-2013. The inclusion criteria were simplex, >= 34 gestational weeks, cephalic presentation and no previous cesarean section. The women were grouped according to BMI, and statistical analyzes were performed to compare the proportion of cesarean sections after induction of labor. The primary outcome was the proportion of cesarean section after induction of labor divided by group of maternal BMI. The secondary outcomes were postpartum hemorrhage >1000 ml, time of labor, fetal outcome data, and indication for emergency cesarean section. Result The induction of labor in women with a high BMI resulted in a significantly increased risk of cesarean section, with 18.4-24.1% of deliveries, depending on the BMI group. This outcome persisted after adjustment in women with BMI 25-29.9 (aOR 1.4; 95% CI; 1.1-1.7) and BMI 30-34.9 (aOR 1.5; 95% CI; 1.1-2.1). There was also a significantly higher risk for CS among primiparous women (aOR 3.6; 95% CI; 2.9-45) and if the newborn weighted >= four kilos (aOR 1.6; 95% CI; 1.3-2.0). Conclusion Our findings show that a higher BMI increased the risk of cesarean section after induction of labor in the groups with BMI 25-34.9. Parity seems to be the strongest risk factor for CS regardless other variables.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Retrospective Case–Control Study Evaluating the Role of Mifepristone for Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section
    Sharma C.
    Soni A.
    Soni P.K.
    Verma S.
    Verma A.
    Gupta A.
    [J]. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2016, 66 (Suppl 1) : 30 - 37
  • [32] Outcomes of Spontaneous Labor in Women Undergoing Trial of Labor after Cesarean as Compared with Nulliparous Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Lassey, Sarah C.
    Robinson, Julian N.
    Kaimal, Anjali J.
    Little, Sarah E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2018, 35 (09) : 852 - 857
  • [33] Risk and benefits of a natural cesarean section - a retrospective cohort study
    Posthuma, Selina
    van der Ploeg, J. Marinus
    Korteweg, Fleurisca
    de Boer, Hans
    Wiersma-Zweens, Mar
    van der Ham, David
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (01) : S346 - S346
  • [34] Elective induction of labor in multiparous women - Does it increase the risk of cesarean section?
    Heinberg, EM
    Wood, RA
    Chambers, RB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2002, 47 (05) : 399 - 403
  • [35] Morbidity after cesarean section in obese women
    Rasmussen, KL
    Linnet, KM
    Jensen, H
    Agger, AO
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 77 (07) : 782 - 783
  • [36] Mechanical induction of labor and ecbolic-less vaginal birth after cesarean section: A cohort study
    Atia, Hytham
    Ellaithy, Mohamed
    Altraigey, Ahmed
    Kolkailah, Mohamed
    Alserehi, Amal
    Ashfaq, Shabana
    [J]. TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 57 (03): : 421 - 426
  • [37] Trial of labor after cesarean section in risk pregnancies: A population-based cohort study
    Lehmann, Sjur
    Baghestan, Elham
    Bordahl, Per Engebret
    Irgens, Lorentz Muller
    Rasmussen, Svein Arvid
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (07) : 894 - 904
  • [38] The perinatal risks associated with trial of labor after cesarean section among obese women
    Yao, Ruofan
    Park, Bo
    Caughey, Aaron
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S308 - S308
  • [39] Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section: Risk of Uterine Rupture with Labor Induction
    Ouzounian, Joseph G.
    Miller, David A.
    Hiebert, Christy J.
    Battista, Leah R.
    Lee, Richard H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2011, 28 (08) : 593 - 596
  • [40] Risk factors for cesarean section after using the Foley catheter for labor induction
    Beta, Jaroslaw
    Issat, Tadeusz
    Nowicka, Malgorzata A.
    Jakimiuk, Artur J.
    [J]. GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2013, 84 (05) : 359 - 362