Is there an increased risk of cesarean section in obese women after induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study

被引:17
|
作者
Bjorklund, Jenny [1 ,2 ]
Wiberg-Itzel, Eva [1 ,2 ]
Wallstrom, Tove [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Soderhosp, Dept Clin Sci & Educ, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Soderhospital, Womens Clin, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0263685
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Obesity is increasing in Sweden and is also of huge global concern. Obesity increases the risk of complications during pregnancy and the need for the induction of labor. Induction of labor increases the number of complications during delivery, leading to women with more negative birth experience. This study investigated how maternal body mass index (BMI) during antenatal care enrollment affects labor outcomes (proportion of cesarean section at induction of labor). Method This was a retrospective cohort study of 3772 women with mixed parity and induction of labor at Soderhospital, Stockholm, in 2009-2010 and 2012-2013. The inclusion criteria were simplex, >= 34 gestational weeks, cephalic presentation and no previous cesarean section. The women were grouped according to BMI, and statistical analyzes were performed to compare the proportion of cesarean sections after induction of labor. The primary outcome was the proportion of cesarean section after induction of labor divided by group of maternal BMI. The secondary outcomes were postpartum hemorrhage >1000 ml, time of labor, fetal outcome data, and indication for emergency cesarean section. Result The induction of labor in women with a high BMI resulted in a significantly increased risk of cesarean section, with 18.4-24.1% of deliveries, depending on the BMI group. This outcome persisted after adjustment in women with BMI 25-29.9 (aOR 1.4; 95% CI; 1.1-1.7) and BMI 30-34.9 (aOR 1.5; 95% CI; 1.1-2.1). There was also a significantly higher risk for CS among primiparous women (aOR 3.6; 95% CI; 2.9-45) and if the newborn weighted >= four kilos (aOR 1.6; 95% CI; 1.3-2.0). Conclusion Our findings show that a higher BMI increased the risk of cesarean section after induction of labor in the groups with BMI 25-34.9. Parity seems to be the strongest risk factor for CS regardless other variables.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Induction of labor after one previous Cesarean section in women with an unfavorable cervix: A retrospective cohort study
    Wallstrom, Tove
    Bjorklund, Jenny
    Frykman, Joanna
    Jarnbert-Pettersson, Hans
    Akerud, Helena
    Darj, Elisabeth
    Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
    Wiberg-Itzel, Eva
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07):
  • [2] Induction of Labor in Women with Previous Cesarean Section and Unfavorable Cervix: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Germano, Chiara
    Mappa, Ilenia
    Cromi, Antonella
    Busato, Enrico
    Incerti, Maddalena
    Lojacono, Andrea
    Rizzo, Giuseppe
    Attini, Rossella
    Patrizi, Lodovico
    Revelli, Alberto
    Masturzo, Bianca
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (04)
  • [3] Tachysystole and risk of cesarean section after labor induction using misoprostol: A cohort study
    Sichitiu, Joanna
    Vial, Yvan
    Panchaud, Alice
    Baud, David
    Desseauve, David
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 249 : 54 - 58
  • [4] Elective induction of labor and the risk of cesarean section in low-risk parous women: a cohort study
    Jonsson, Maria
    Cnattingius, Sven
    Wikstrom, Anna-Karin
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (02) : 198 - 203
  • [5] Success of trial of labor in women with a history of previous cesarean section for failed labor induction or labor dystocia: a retrospective cohort study
    Katariina Place
    Heidi Kruit
    Aydin Tekay
    Seppo Heinonen
    Leena Rahkonen
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19
  • [6] Success of trial of labor in women with a history of previous cesarean section for failed labor induction or labor dystocia: a retrospective cohort study
    Place, Katariina
    Kruit, Heidi
    Tekay, Aydin
    Heinonen, Seppo
    Rahkonen, Leena
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [7] Induction of labor in women with one previous Cesarean Section and the risk of acute Cesarean Section in labor
    Rasmussen, Ole
    Rasmussen, Steen
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 91 : 119 - 120
  • [8] Predictive model for risk of cesarean section in pregnant women after induction of labor
    Hernandez-Martinez, Antonio
    Pascual-Pedreno, Ana I.
    Bano-Garnes, Ana B.
    Melero-Jimenez, Maria R.
    Tenias-Burillo, Jose M.
    Molina-Alarcon, Milagros
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 293 (03) : 529 - 538
  • [9] Predictive model for risk of cesarean section in pregnant women after induction of labor
    Antonio Hernández-Martínez
    Ana I. Pascual-Pedreño
    Ana B. Baño-Garnés
    María R. Melero-Jiménez
    José M. Tenías-Burillo
    Milagros Molina-Alarcón
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2016, 293 : 529 - 538
  • [10] Artificial rupture of membranes as a mode for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section- a retrospective cohort study
    Aharon Dick
    Einat Gutman-Ido
    Henry Hillel Chill
    Gilad Karavani
    Ina Ryvkin
    Shay Porat
    Joshua Isaac Rosenbloom
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22