Comparison of efficacy of silver-nanoparticle gel, nano-silver-foam and collagen dressings in treatment of partial thickness burn wounds

被引:22
|
作者
Erring, Miying [1 ]
Gaba, Sunil [1 ]
Mohsina, Subair [1 ]
Tripathy, Satyaswarup [1 ]
Sharma, Ramesh Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] PGIMER, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Chandigarh, India
关键词
Re-epithelialisation; Healing; Second-degree burns; Silver dressing; Cost-effectiveness; Scar quality; NANOCRYSTALLINE SILVER; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; ACTICOAT(TM); MANAGEMENT; SULFADIAZINE; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.burns.2019.07.019
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study was carried out to compare the efficacy of silver nanoparticle gel (SG), nanosilver foam (SF) and collagen (C) dressings in partial thickness burn wounds. Methods: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study carried out over a period of 1 year on patients with 15-40% partial thickness thermal burns <48h. Each patient received all three dressings (silver-nanoparticle gel, nanosilver foam, collagen) simultaneously at 3 randomly selected areas which were comparable in terms of burn depth and surface area. Efficacy of the dressings was assessed in terms of healing rates, time taken and ease of application, pain at dressing change, cost, wound-swab culture and scar quality (at 3 months). Results: A total of 20 patients were included. In SF group, number of patients with 60%-80% re-epithelialization on day10 (SG: 10/20; C: 10/20; SF: 16/20; p = 0.042) and complete healing on day14 (SF: 11/20, C: 6/20, SG: 4/20; p = 0.032) was significantly higher. The time for dressing change was similar at admission (p = 0.918) and day 10 (p = 0.163), although majority of the patients in SF group needed less than 10 min. The time taken (<10 min) was significantly lower in SF group by 14th day (SF: 18/20 C: 6/20 SG: 6/20; p < 0.001). The ease of application rated by clinicians as "extremely easy" was significantly better in SF group (SG: 78%, C: 80%, SF: 95%; p = 0.011). There was a significantly faster decrease in pain scores in SF group by 5th day (VAS score SF: 6, C: 8; SG: 8; p = 0.038), however, pain scores were comparable at 2 weeks. The scar quality (p = 0.82), cost (p = 0.09) and infection rates (SG: 7/20; C: 4/20; SF: 3/20; p = 0.05) were comparable. The need for skin-graft cover was lower in SF group (SG: 5/20; C: 3/20; SF: 1/20). Conclusion: Nanosilver-foam dressings were found to be more efficacious for re-epithelialization, healing, ease of application, tolerance when compared to silver nanoparticle gel and collagen dressings in partial-thickness burns. All were found to be safe. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1888 / 1894
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Long-Term Skin Quality and Scar Formation in Partial-Thickness Burn Wounds Treated with Suprathel® and epicitehydro® Wound Dressings
    Schiefer, Jennifer Lynn
    Aretz, Friederike Genoveva
    Fuchs, Paul Christian
    Lefering, Rolf
    Yary, Pouyan
    Oplaender, Christian
    Schulz, Alexandra
    Daniels, Marc
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (11):
  • [42] Optimization of reaction conditions to fabricate Ocimum sanctum synthesized silver nanoparticles and its application to nano-gel systems for burn wounds
    Sood, Richa
    Chopra, Dimple Sethi
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2018, 92 : 575 - 589
  • [43] Preparation of Silver Ion Antimicrobial Dressings and Prevention and Treatment of Central Venous Catheter-Related Infection on Burn Wounds of Critically Burned Patients
    Li, Na
    Li, Xi
    Li, Juan
    Yang, Meng
    Ren, Liqing
    Li, Cuikun
    JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS AND TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2022, 12 (01) : 146 - 152
  • [44] Silver delivery approaches in the management of partial thickness burns: A systematic review and indirect treatment comparison
    Nherera, Leo
    Trueman, Paul
    Roberts, Christopher
    Berg, Leena
    WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2017, 25 (04) : 707 - 721
  • [45] The Optimal Treatment for Partial Thickness Burns: A Cost-Utility Analysis of Skin Allograft vs. Topical Silver Dressings
    Sheckter, Clifford C.
    Meyerkord, Nickolas L.
    Sinskey, Yunna L.
    Clark, Pariss
    Anderson, Katarina
    Van Vliet, Michael
    JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH, 2020, 41 (03): : 450 - 456
  • [46] Retrospective comparison of negative pressure wound therapy and silver-coated foam dressings in open-wound treatment in cats
    Nolff, Mirja Christine
    Fehr, Michael
    Reese, Sven
    Meyer-Lindenberg, Andrea E.
    JOURNAL OF FELINE MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2017, 19 (06) : 624 - 630
  • [47] A matched-pair, randomized study evaluating the efficacy and safety of Acticoat silver-coated dressing for the treatment of burn wounds
    Tredget, EE
    Shankowsky, HA
    Groeneveld, A
    Burrell, R
    JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & REHABILITATION, 1998, 19 (06): : 531 - 537
  • [48] Randomized Clinical Study of SilvaSorb® Gel in Comparison to Silvadene® Silver Sulfadiazine Cream in the Management of Partial-Thickness Burns
    Glat, Paul M.
    Kubat, Wade D.
    Hsu, John F.
    Copty, Tarek
    Burkey, Brooke A.
    Davis, Wellington
    Goodwin, Isak
    JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & RESEARCH, 2009, 30 (02): : 262 - 267
  • [49] An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter investigation evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of Mepilex Ag versus silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of deep partial-thickness burn injuries
    Tang, Hongtai
    Lv, Guozhong
    Fu, Jinfeng
    Niu, Xihua
    Li, Yeyang
    Zhang, Mei
    Zhang, Guo'an
    Hu, Dahai
    Chen, Xiaodong
    Lei, Jin
    Qi, Hongyan
    Xia, Zhaofan
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2015, 78 (05): : 1000 - 1007
  • [50] Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Silver-Coated Foam Dressings in Open Wound Treatment in Dogs: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial
    Nolff, Mirja C.
    Albert, Rebecca
    Reese, Sven
    Meyer-Lindenberg, Andrea
    VETERINARY AND COMPARATIVE ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2018, 31 (04) : 229 - 238