Arctic Warming Revealed by Multiple CMIP6 Models: Evaluation of Historical Simulations and Quantification of Future Projection Uncertainties

被引:60
|
作者
Cai, Ziyi [1 ]
You, Qinglong [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Fangying [3 ]
Chen, Hans W. [4 ]
Chen, Deliang [5 ]
Cohen, Judah [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Inst Atmospher Sci, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Zhuhai Fudan Innovat Res Inst, Innovat Ctr Ocean & Atmosphere Syst, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Key Lab Meteorol Disaster, Minist Educ, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Lund Univ, Dept Phys Geog & Ecosyst Sci, Lund, Sweden
[5] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Earth Sci, Reg Climate Grp, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Atmospher & Environm Res Inc, Lexington, MA USA
[7] MIT, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Arctic; Climate prediction; Temperature; Coupled models; Model evaluation/performance; SURFACE AIR-TEMPERATURE; SEA-ICE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; AMPLIFICATION; CHINA; PRECIPITATION; FEEDBACKS; GREENLAND; ATLANTIC; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0791.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The Arctic has experienced a warming rate higher than the global mean in the past decades, but previous studies show that there are large uncertainties associated with future Arctic temperature projections. In this study, near-surface mean temperatures in the Arctic are analyzed from 22 models participating in phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Compared with the ERA5 reanalysis, most CMIP6 models underestimate the observed mean temperature in the Arctic during 1979-2014. The largest cold biases are found over the Greenland Sea the Barents Sea, and the Kara Sea. Under the SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 scenarios, the multimodel ensemble mean of 22 CMIP6 models exhibits significant Arctic warming in the future and the warming rate is more than twice that of the global/Northern Hemisphere mean. Model spread is the largest contributor to the overall uncertainty in projections, which accounts for 55.4% of the total uncertainty at the start of projections in 2015 and remains at 32.9% at the end of projections in 2095. Internal variability uncertainty accounts for 39.3% of the total uncertainty at the start of projections but decreases to 6.5% at the end of the twenty-first century, while scenario uncertainty rapidly increases from 5.3% to 60.7% over the period from 2015 to 2095. It is found that the largest model uncertainties are consistent cold bias in the oceanic regions in the models, which is connected with excessive sea ice area caused by the weak Atlantic poleward heat transport. These results suggest that large intermodel spread and uncertainties exist in the CMIP6 models' simulation and projection of the Arctic near-surface temperature and that there are different responses over the ocean and land in the Arctic to greenhouse gas forcing. Future research needs to pay more attention to the different characteristics and mechanisms of Arctic Ocean and land warming to reduce the spread.
引用
收藏
页码:4871 / 4892
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Inferring future warming in the Arctic from the observed global warming trend and CMIP6 simulations
    Hu Xiao-Ming
    Ma Jie-Ru
    Ying Jun
    Cai Ming
    Kong Yun-Qi
    ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, 2021, 12 (04) : 499 - 507
  • [2] Evaluation of Historical Simulations of CMIP6 Models for Temperature and Precipitation in Guatemala
    Paris Rivera
    Earth Systems and Environment, 2023, 7 : 43 - 65
  • [3] Evaluation of Historical Simulations of CMIP6 Models for Temperature and Precipitation in Guatemala
    Rivera, Paris
    EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 7 (01) : 43 - 65
  • [4] Arctic Ocean Amplification in a warming climate in CMIP6 models
    Shu, Qi
    Wang, Qiang
    Arthun, Marius
    Wang, Shizhu
    Song, Zhenya
    Zhang, Min
    Qiao, Fangli
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2022, 8 (30)
  • [5] Historical and Future Projected Warming of Antarctic Shelf Bottom Water in CMIP6 Models
    Purich, Ariaan
    England, Matthew H.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 48 (10)
  • [6] Past warming trend constrains future warming in CMIP6 models
    Tokarska, Katarzyna B.
    Stolpe, Martin B.
    Sippel, Sebastian
    Fischer, Erich M.
    Smith, Christopher J.
    Lehner, Flavio
    Knutti, Reto
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2020, 6 (12):
  • [7] A Spatial Evaluation of Arctic Sea Ice and Regional Limitations in CMIP6 Historical Simulations
    Watts, Matthew
    Maslowski, Wieslaw
    Lee, Younjoo J.
    Kinney, Jaclyn Clement
    Osinski, Robert
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (15) : 6399 - 6420
  • [8] Historical assessment and future projection of extreme precipitation in CMIP6 models: Global and continental
    Feng, Taichen
    Zhu, Xian
    Dong, Wenjie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2023, 43 (09) : 4119 - 4135
  • [9] Applicability of CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models in China: Reproducibility of Historical Simulation and Uncertainty of Future Projection
    Jia, Qimeng
    Jia, Haifeng
    Li, Yijia
    Yin, Ingkun
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2023, 36 (17) : 5809 - 5824
  • [10] Evaluation of historical CMIP6 model simulations and future projections of temperature and precipitation in Paraguay
    Miguel A. Lovino
    María Josefina Pierrestegui
    Omar V. Müller
    Ernesto Hugo Berbery
    Gabriela V. Müller
    Max Pasten
    Climatic Change, 2021, 164