Use of 3D transabdominal ultrasound imaging for treatment planning in cervical cancer brachytherapy: Comparison to magnetic resonance and computed tomography

被引:16
|
作者
St-Amant, Patricia [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Foster, William [1 ]
Froment, Marie-Anne [1 ]
Aubini, Sylviane [1 ]
Lavallee, Marie-Claude [1 ]
Beaulieu, Luc [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] CHU Quebec Univ Laval, Radiat Oncol Dept, Laval, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, Dept Phys Phys Engn & Opt, Laval, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Laval, Canc Res Ctr, Laval, PQ, Canada
[4] CHU Quebec Univ Laval, Ctr Rech CHU Quebec & Axe Oncol, Laval, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Cervix; Ultrasound; Magnetic resonance imaging; Computed tomography; Treatment planning; 3D; GUIDED ADAPTIVE BRACHYTHERAPY; SOCIETY CONSENSUS GUIDELINES; LOCALLY ADVANCED-CARCINOMA; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND; AMERICAN BRACHYTHERAPY; TARGET; RECOMMENDATIONS; PRINCIPLES; PARAMETERS; UTERUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.brachy.2017.03.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate if the addition of 3D transabdominal ultrasound (3DTAUS) imaging to computed tomography (CT) can improve treatment planning in 3D adaptive brachytherapy when compared with CT-based planning alone, resulting in treatment plans closer to the ones obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based planning. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Five patients with cervical cancer undergoing brachytherapy underwent three imaging modalities: MRI, CT, and CT-3DTAUS. Volumes were delineated by a radiation oncologist and treatment plans were optimized on each imaging modality. To compare treatment plans, the dwell times optimized on MRI were transferred on CT and CT-3DTAUS images and dose parameters were reported on volumes of the receiving imaging modality. The plans optimized on CT and CT-3DTAUS were also copied and evaluated on MRI images. RESULTS: Treatment plans optimized and evaluated on the same imaging modalities were clinically acceptable but statistically different (p < 0.05) from one another. MR-based plans had the highest target coverage (98%) and CT-based plans the lowest (93%). For all treatment plans evaluated on MRI, the target coverage was equivalent. However, a decrease in target coverage (V100) was observed when MR-based plans were applied on CT-3DTAUS (6%) and CT (13%) with p < 0.05. An increase in the rectum/sigmoid dose (D2cc) was observed with both CT-3DTAUS based (0.6 Gy) and CT-based planning (1 Gy) when compared with MR-based plans, whereas bladder dose stayed similar. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with CT-based planning, the addition of 3DTAUS to CT results in treatment plans closer to MR-based planning. Its use reduces the high-risk clinical target volume overestimation typically observed on CT, improving coverage of the target volume while reducing dose to the organs at risk. (C) 2017 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 854
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Evaluation of ampullary and pancreatic tumors with endoscopic ultrasound magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and transabdominal ultrasound
    Schoefer, M
    Nagell, W
    Klein, S
    Weber, C
    Scharnke, W
    Dancygier, H
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1999, 116 (04) : A499 - A499
  • [12] Craniosynostosis: prenatal diagnosis by 2D/3D ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography
    Helfer, Talita Micheletti
    Peixoto, Alberto Borges
    Tonni, Gabriele
    Araujo Junior, Edward
    MEDICAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2016, 18 (03) : 378 - 385
  • [13] Comparison of Computed Tomography- and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Clinical Target Volume Contours at Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer
    Swanick, Cameron W.
    Castle, Katherine O.
    Vedam, Sastry
    Munsell, Mark F.
    Turner, Lehendrick M.
    Rauch, Gaiane M.
    Jhingran, Anuja
    Eifel, Patricia J.
    Klopp, Ann H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (04): : 793 - 800
  • [14] Dosimetric impact of target definition in brachytherapy for cervical cancer-Computed tomography and trans rectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging
    Swamidas, Jamema
    Jain, Jeevanshu
    Nesvacil, Nicole
    Tanderup, Kari
    Kirisits, Christian
    Schmid, Max
    Agarwal, Priyanka
    Joshi, Kishore
    Naga, Pushpa
    Khadanga, Chira Ranjan
    Gudi, Shivakumar
    Gurram, Lavanya
    Chopra, Supriya
    Mahantshetty, Umesh
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 21 : 126 - 133
  • [15] Comparison of 3D Ultrasound Imaging to Computed Tomography in Knee Osteophyte Depiction
    Vendries, Valeria
    Ungi, Tamas
    Kunz, Manuela
    MacKenzie, Leslie W.
    Venne, Gabriel
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2018, 32 (01):
  • [16] Comparison of impact of target delineation of computed tomography- and magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy on dose distribution in cervical cancer
    Tuntipumiamorn, Lalida
    Lohasammakul, Suphalerk
    Dankulchai, Pittaya
    Nakkrasae, Pitchayut
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2018, 10 (05) : 418 - 424
  • [17] Comparison of computed tomography and 3D magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating glenohumeral instability bone loss
    Lander, Sarah T.
    Liles, Jordan L.
    Kim, Billy I.
    Taylor, Dean C.
    Lau, Brian C.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (11) : 2217 - 2224
  • [18] Comparison of image processing techniques (Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scan and ultrasound) for 3D modeling and analysis of the human bones
    Bhavin V. Mehta
    Sailesh Rajani
    Guatam Sinha
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 1997, 10 : 203 - 206
  • [19] Comparison of image processing techniques (magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scan and ultrasound) for 3D modeling and analysis of the human bones
    Mehta, BV
    Rajani, S
    Sinha, G
    JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 1997, 10 (03) : 203 - 206
  • [20] The accuracy of 3-dimensional magnetic resonance 3D vibe images of the mandible: an in vitro comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography
    Goto, Tazuko K.
    Nishida, Satoko
    Nakamura, Yuko
    Tokumori, Kenji
    Nakamura, Yasuhiko
    Kobayashi, Koji
    Yoshida, Yutaka
    Yoshiura, Kazunori
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2007, 103 (04): : 550 - 559