Development of the RIPASA score: a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

被引:2
|
作者
Chong, C. F. [1 ]
Adi, M. I. W. [2 ]
Thien, A. [1 ]
Suyoi, A. [1 ]
Mackie, A. J. [1 ]
Tin, A. S. [1 ]
Tripathi, S. [1 ]
Jaman, N. H. [1 ]
Tan, K. K. [1 ]
Kok, K. Y. [1 ]
Mathew, V. V. [1 ]
Paw, O. [1 ]
Chua, H. B. [1 ]
Yapp, S. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Hosp, Dept Surg, BA-1710 Bandar Seri, Begawan, Brunei
[2] Univ Brunei Darussalam, Inst Med, BE-1410 Jalan Tungku Link, Gadong, Brunei
关键词
acute appendicitis; appendicectomy; diagnostic techniques; surgical; symptoms; MODIFIED ALVARADO SCORE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical emergencies. The Alvarado and modified Alvarado scores have been developed to aid diagnosis, but both scoring systems have poor sensitivity and specificity when applied in Middle Eastern and Asian populations. The aim of this study was to develop a new scoring system that is suitable for the local population. Methods: Clinical data from 312 patients who had undergone an emergency appendicectomy was retrospectively collected and used to generate 15 parameters. The probability was calculated and a score of 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 was allocated to each parameter. The receiver operating curve (ROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the new scoring system were derived using the StatsDirect statistical software. Results: The 15 parameters and the scores generated were age (less than 40 years is 1 point; greater than 40 years is 0.5 point), gender (male is 1 point; female is 0.5 point), right iliac fossa (RIF) pain (0.5 point), migration of pain to RIF (0.5 point), nausea and vomiting (1 point), anorexia (1 point), duration of symptoms (less than 48 hours is 1 point; more than 48 hours is 0.5 point), RIF tenderness (1 point), guarding (2 points), rebound tenderness (1 point), Rovsing's sign (2 points), fever (1 point), raised white cell count (1 point), negative urinalysis (1 point) and foreign national registration identity card (1 point). The optimal cut-off threshold score from the ROC was 7.5, with a sensitivity of 88 percent, a specificity of 67 percent, a PPV of 93 percent and an NPV of 53 percent. The negative appendicectomy rate decreased significantly from 16.3 percent to 6.9 percent, which was a 9.4 percent reduction (p is 0.0007). Conclusion: The new appendicitis scoring system looked promising when applied to our settings, and had a better sensitivity and specificity than the Alvarado score when applied to Asian populations. A significant reduction in the negative appendicectomy rate was also predicted. A prospective evaluation of this new appendicitis scoring system, referred to as the RIPASA score, is ongoing.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 225
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Malaya Score: New Diagnostic Scoring System for Acute Appendicitis
    Abd Karim, Muhammad Fairuz Shah Bin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 236 (05) : S41 - S41
  • [22] Evaluation of modified Alvarado scoring system and RIPASA scoring system as diagnostic tools of acute appendicitis
    Shuaib, Abdullah
    Shuaib, Ali
    Fakhra, Zainab
    Marafi, Bader
    Alsharaf, Khalid
    Behbehani, Abdullah
    WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 8 (04) : 276 - 280
  • [23] Evaluation of modified Alvarado scoring system and RIPASA scoring system as diagnostic tools of acute appendicitis
    Abdullah Shuaib
    Ali Shuaib
    Zainab Fakhra
    Bader Marafi
    Khalid Alsharaf
    Abdullah Behbehani
    World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2017, (04) : 276 - 280
  • [24] Evaluation of modified Alvarado scoring system and RIPASA scoring system as diagnostic tools of acute appendicitis
    Abdullah Shuaib
    Ali Shuaib
    Zainab Fakhra
    Bader Marafi
    Khalid Alsharaf
    Abdullah Behbehani
    World Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2017, 8 (04) : 276 - 280
  • [25] Comparison between diagnostic accuracy of RIPASA score and Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis
    Ebied, Essam F.
    Mostafa, Mohab G. El Din
    Balamon, Remon M.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 40 (04): : 1110 - 1115
  • [26] Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis Using Scoring System: Compared with the Alvarado Score
    Kim, Bin Soo
    Ryu, Dong Hee
    Kim, Tae Hwa
    Jeong, Il Ung
    Song, Jun Ho
    Cho, Sung Il
    Kim, Jin Kweon
    Jeong, Yong Sik
    Lee, Sang Jeon
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 79 (03): : 207 - 214
  • [27] Sensitivity, Specificity and Reliability of the RIPASA Score for Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Relation to the Alvarado Score
    Arroyo-Rangel, Celerino
    Limon, Ivan O.
    Vera, Angel G.
    Guardiola, Pedro M.
    Sanchez-Valdivieso, Enrique A.
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2018, 96 (03): : 149 - 154
  • [28] Alvarado versus RIPASA score in diagnosing acute appendicitis
    Alnjadat, Ismail
    Abdallah, Baha
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 38 (02): : 147 - 151
  • [29] COMPARISON OF RIPASA AND ALVARADO SCORING SYSTEM IN ACUTE APPENDICITIS- A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY
    Ansara, Thameen S.
    Kumar, Vishnu S.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2018, 7 (15): : 1872 - 1876
  • [30] Can We Use the RIPASA Scoring System in Cases of Suspicious Acute Appendicitis?
    Somuncu, Erkan
    HASEKI TIP BULTENI-MEDICAL BULLETIN OF HASEKI, 2020, 58 (01): : 61 - 64